The story of the multi-layered front unfolding, the key is Lee’s whereregardings… ‘Swamp of confusion’ ahead of the ethics committee deliberation on the 7th
Scenarios such as the Early Squadron ‘Greumtl’ under the party competition
Lee’s ‘message war’ begins… Observation of ‘尹心’ support request
As the Central Ethics Committee’s disciplinary review of the People’s Power Representative Lee Jun-seok is scheduled for the 7th of next month, the chaos within the ruling party in the early days of taking power is gradually aggravating.
It is predicted that the result of this disciplinary action will be a significant watershed that can separate the political fate of Lee, as well as the power landscape inside the passport at the beginning of the presidential term of President Yoon Seok-yeol.
Accordingly, within the party, there are complex debates regarding the pros and cons of the appropriateness of disciplinary deliberation by the Ethics Committee, criticisms regarding the postponement of the disciplinary schedule, and the debate over the representative responsibility theory.
In addition, as internal conflicts within the leadership, such as opposition to the innovation committee launched by Chairman Lee and the issue of recommending the top member for the People’s Party, are intertwined, an analysis is coming out that the power struggle within the party is literally falling into a ‘clock zero’ state.
Among the entangled multi-layered wires, the biggest decisive factor is the issue of CEO Lee’s whereregardings.
If Lee resigns midway due to the followingmath of the Ethics Committee’s decision, gunshots will sound announcing the start of the next party power race.
Article 21 of the Ethics Committee Regulations of the People’s Power Party Regulations divides the level of disciplinary action into four stages in order of strength: expulsion, recommendation to leave the party, suspension of party membership, and warning. This is expected to be large.
Accordingly, various scenarios are being carefully discussed within the party, such as the possibility of holding an early squadron centering on the next party in power.
Isn’t the party competition wriggling over the fact that the movement to form a group such as ‘Dandelion’, which is already led by pro-yun (Chin Yun Seok-yeol) lawmakers, and ‘Innovation 24 New Future’, led by Kim Ki-hyun, who is considered to be the next party leader, is in full swing? is also interpreted in the same context.
The representative of Lee, who has lost the ‘fire in the foot’, plans to engage in an active ‘message war’ by emphasizing the injustice of this disciplinary action for the next 12 days.
An official from the party said on the 26th, “Lee is a style that does not back down once he pulls out his sword.
Even if you are disciplined by the Ethics Committee, you can request a retrial within 10 days, and the decision on the request for reexamination must be completed within 30 days.
In addition to the retrial process, the possibility of legal action, such as an application for an injunction to be suspended as the last card, is also being discussed.
The intention of CEO Lee to rely on the so-called ‘yun heart’ can also be seen.
Following a recent private meeting with President Yoon Seok-yeol, CEO Lee is pursuing a plan to meet once more when President Yoon returns to Korea following attending the NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) summit.
Both sides dismiss the possibility of President Yun’s involvement in party affairs, and are wary of an expanded interpretation of the nature of the meeting.
However, there are also some interpretations that President Lee wants President Yoon to support him in yin and yang.
In the situation where the front of the conflict between Chairman Lee and Yoon Hak-kwan was reenacted, President Yoon’s point of view was that Rep. Jang Je-won, a ‘Yun Hak-kwan’ (a key official of President Yoon), directly hit the party situation recently, saying, “Is this a party that helps the president?” is in desperate need of help.
Accordingly, it is observed that he will try to break through the disciplinary crisis and opposition within the party by forming a consensus that the confusion of the ruling passport at the beginning of his term can never be helpful in carrying out state affairs.
Inside and outside the party, there are predictions that the power struggle within the ruling party will find some stability if Chairman Lee succeeds in escaping the current crisis, but on the contrary, the voices of those who oppose this representative system will come out louder and another chaos will begin. At the same time, concerns are raised that
/yunhap news
