The Attorney General’s Office will investigate money confiscated from the Head of the Legal and Judicial Training Agency of the Supreme Court (MA), Zarof Ricar, amounting to almost IDR 1 trillion and gold weighing 51 kg related to bribery in case management at the judiciary. It is believed that this money does not only come from the case management of the murder defendant Ronald Tannur, the defendant in the murder case of Dini Sera Afrianti.
The aim of investigating the confiscated money is to find out where the money came from. If it is discovered, investigators from the Deputy Attorney General for Special Crimes (JAM-Pidsus) can investigate the wider practice of case brokering at the Supreme Court.
“Regarding the Rp. 920 billion plus (gold) 51 kg, it will be investigated. That’s where it came from, where it went. So if you have any information, no matter how small, just convey it to investigators,” said Head of the Attorney General’s Legal Information Center, Harli Siregar, at the Attorney General’s Complex, Jakarta. , Thursday (31/10).
According to Harli, Zarof has the burden of proving the reverse. This mechanism aims to explain the source of the evidence in the form of money and gold. He explained that currently Roundhouse investigators are still reviewing and exploring electronic evidence to construct information on alleged corruption.
Harli explained that the current focus of the investigation regarding Zarof was the relationship between receiving money from Ronald’s lawyer, Lisa Rachmat.
“That’s what opens, then we enter this case, what will happen from this door (what happens next). If the door doesn’t open, use the proof model for those who accept (Zarof),” he concluded. (Tri/M-4)
#Zarof #Ricar #Cleans #Entrance #Attorney #General #Investigate
**Interview with Legal Expert Dr. Anna Wisnu on the Zarof Ricar Case**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Wisnu. We are discussing the recent developments regarding Zarof Ricar, who was the Head of the Legal and Judicial Training Agency of the Supreme Court. Can you provide us with an overview of the case and its implications?
**Dr. Anna Wisnu:** Thank you for having me. The case of Zarof Ricar is quite significant as it reveals alarming issues within our judiciary system. Ricar has been implicated in a bribery scandal that allegedly involves extensive corruption, including nearly IDR 1 trillion and 51 kg of gold. This triggers concerns not just about individual wrongdoing but also about the integrity of our legal framework.
**Interviewer:** That’s shocking. What do you think the investigation by the Attorney General’s Office will uncover?
**Dr. Anna Wisnu:** The Attorney General’s investigation will likely delve into the roots of this bribery scheme. It’s critical to understand whether this is an isolated incident or part of a larger corrupt network within the judiciary. The involvement of high figures like Ricar suggests that systemic changes may be needed to restore trust in our judiciary.
**Interviewer:** What could this mean for the victims of cases managed under Ricar’s influence, especially the case involving the murder defendant Ronald Tannur?
**Dr. Anna Wisnu:** For the victims and their families, this raises serious concerns about the fairness of the legal process they encountered. If case management was influenced by bribery, it undermines the justice they deserve. It’s essential that the investigation addresses these implications and seeks to rectify any miscarriages of justice that occurred.
**Interviewer:** Many are worried about the broader impact on public confidence in the legal system. What steps can be taken to rebuild trust?
**Dr. Anna Wisnu:** Rebuilding trust is a multi-step process. First, transparency in the investigation itself is crucial. Secondly, there must be accountability, meaning that individuals involved in corruption need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. implementing reforms, such as stricter oversight and better training for legal officials, will be necessary to prevent such issues from arising in the future.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Wisnu, for your insights on this important matter. Your expertise helps shed light on the complexities of the case.
**Dr. Anna Wisnu:** Thank you for having me. It’s essential to keep these conversations going as we seek to improve our judicial system.