Accountability Court summoned former President Asif Zardari and former Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani in NAB cases. Accountability Islamabad has issued summon notices in fake bank accounts and Tosha Khan case. The court has issued a summons notice to former President Asif Zardari in the fake bank accounts case and he has been summoned on October 24.
On the other hand, the accountability court has also summoned PP leader and former prime minister Yusuf Raza Gilani on October 24 in the Tosha Khana case.
It should be noted that on the last day of his tenure, former Chief Justice Umar Atta Bandyal declared the petition of chairman PTI against the NAB amendments admissible and declared 9 out of 10 amendments of the NAB amendments null and void.
After the Supreme Court annulled the NAB amendments, the cases against former President Asif Ali Zardari and 6 former Prime Ministers were reopened.
The Supreme Court in the decision restored all the cases of politicians and said that all cases should be rescheduled in NAB courts and accountability courts.
Cases closed against many politicians have been revived after the Supreme Court struck down the NAB amendments.
After the decision of the Supreme Court, the Tosha Khana reference against Asif Ali Zardari, Nawaz Sharif and Yusuf Raza Gilani has been restored.
The LNG reference of former prime minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi was transferred from the accountability court and the rental power reference against former prime minister Raja Pervez Ashraf was also returned, which has now been reinstated.
Apart from this, the cases against former Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif, former Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz and former Finance Minister Ishaq Dar will also be reopened.
#Zardari #Gilani #summoned #court #Toshakhana #fake #accounts #cases
Interview with Political Analyst, Sara Khan
Interviewer: Thank you for joining us today, Sara. We’re seeing some significant developments in Pakistan with former President Asif Zardari and former Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani being summoned by the Accountability Court. Can you break down what this means?
Sara Khan: Thank you for having me. Yes, this is quite an important moment in Pakistan’s political landscape. The summons for both Zardari and Gilani, particularly in relation to the fake bank accounts and Tosha Khan case, highlights ongoing concerns regarding corruption and accountability in government.
Interviewer: How serious are the allegations against them, and what are the implications for their political futures?
Sara Khan: The allegations are quite serious. The fake bank accounts case involves accusations of money laundering and misuse of power. For Zardari, who has a long history of legal troubles, this could further tarnish his legacy. For Gilani, being associated with these allegations could impact his reputation, especially among his constituency. The implications could be substantial, affecting their political careers and possibly the broader political narrative in Pakistan, particularly as we approach future elections.
Interviewer: What has been the public reaction to these summons?
Sara Khan: The public reaction is mixed. Some view this as a necessary step towards accountability in a country where political leaders often evade justice. Others, particularly supporters of Zardari and Gilani, see this as a politically motivated move aimed at discrediting them. There is a significant amount of polarization around these issues in Pakistan, and that is reflected in the public discourse.
Interviewer: what’s next for both former leaders in this legal process?
Sara Khan: Both leaders will likely need to prepare their legal defenses, and we can expect to see a lot of political maneuvering in the coming months. They may challenge the summons in court or work to rally public support. Ultimately, how they navigate these challenges will heavily influence their political futures and the overall landscape in Pakistan.
Interviewer: Thank you, Sara, for your insights. It will be interesting to see how this unfolds.
Sara Khan: Thank you for having me. It’s definitely a situation worth watching closely.
This isn’t his first encounter with corruption charges; he’s had a long history of legal battles. As for Gilani, the Tosha Khana case revolves around the alleged unlawful acquisition of state gifts. The implications for their political futures are significant—if found guilty, they could face heavy penalties, which may render them politically inactive for years. This not only affects their personal political aspirations but also impacts their parties and broader political alliances.
Interviewer: You mentioned the revival of these cases following the Supreme Court’s decision. How does this decision affect the political climate in Pakistan?
Sara Khan: The Supreme Court’s ruling to annul the NAB amendments is pivotal. It has reopened cases against numerous politicians, creating a ripple effect in the political arena. This indicates a renewed focus on accountability, and it may lead to a shift in party dynamics. Politicians might feel pressured to either distance themselves from those facing charges or to reinforce their defenses and rally support. It has intensified the scrutiny of political figures, which could have broader implications for upcoming elections.
Interviewer: What do you think the public reaction will be to these developments?
Sara Khan: Public response can be quite polarized in Pakistan. Supporters of Zardari and Gilani may view these summons as politically motivated attacks, while opponents will likely see them as necessary steps towards accountability. it may reignite discussions about corruption and governance in Pakistan, leading to increased demands for transparency. The effectiveness of the accountability process will also significantly influence public opinion.
Interviewer: Thank you for your insights, Sara. It will be interesting to see how these cases unfold and their impact on Pakistani politics moving forward.
Sara Khan: Thank you! It’s certainly a critical juncture, and I look forward to discussing further developments as they arise.
