Last week, the rumor that Zaira Nara was going through a severe crisis with Jacob Von Plessen was strengthened by the version that he had been unfaithful to her in Paris, when he escorted Mauro Icardi In his clandestine meeting with the Chinese Suarez.
Careful of her privacy, the model and host put her chest to the subject and to the uncomfortable questions related to her relationship situation with the father of her two children, Angels and Viggo.
“It is very difficult for us to reconcile your work with mine. I put quite a stop… I’m not going to tell you ‘we’re having our best time’. Things happen”, Zaira assumed in a note with Show Partners (Monday to Friday, 11 a.m. eltrece).
“I feel like it’s a ‘who knows something and we add?’ I swear it’s anyone,” said Zaira, denying the version that Jakob was unfaithful in Paris.
“There is no crisis because of what happened in Paris?”, retorted the chronicler. And Wanda Nara’s sister replied: “not my familyJakob and the boys, it has enough structure that it hasn’t broken anything“.
Already bluntly, the notary of Partners of the Spectacle asked Zaira regarding the rumors that Von Plessen was unfaithful to her, and she replied, seriously: “I feel like it’s a ‘who knows something and we add?’. I swear he’s anyone”.
JAKOB VON PLESSEN’S VERSION OF INFIDELITY TO ZAIRA NARA
On March 23, Karina Iavicoli developed an explosive information regarding Zaira Nara and Jacob Von Plessenin which he staged the affair of Mauro Icardi and Chinese Suarez.
The panelist related the powerful couple crisis that the driver would be experiencing with the clandestine meeting that the PSG footballer had with China in a hotel in Paris, in September 2021.
“Jakob accompanies (Zaira’s) brother-in-law and, supposedly, waits for him (in the car). But the information I have is that Zaira would have found out that while Mauro was with China, Jakob would not have been alone”Iavicoli said.
Karina then added: “On top of that, I would have been with a well-known model. That is the break. it was in paris. While one was doing one thing, the other was doing something else.”
