Xuzhou eight-child mother’s “marriage certificate” exposed documents are full of loopholes | Feng County | Trafficking |

[The Epoch Times, February 16, 2022](Comprehensive report by The Epoch Times reporter Li Jing) JiangsuXuzhouThe “Mother of Eight” incident that was exposed during the Beijing Winter Olympics aroused constant attention from public opinion at home and abroad. Recently, the “marriage photo” of “Mother of Eight” has been posted on the Internet. However, because the villages and towns involved in “Mother of Eight” are strictly controlled by the authorities, the “marriage photo” has raised questions from netizens.

On February 15, Deng Fei, the former director of the reporter department of “Phoenix Weekly”, said on his Weibo that he received an outdated photo of Yang Mouxia and Dong Zhimin, the “mother of eight children”, from netizens, showing that they registered their marriage in August 1998. , Yang was born on June 6, 1969. The date of issuance is August 2, 1998.

He said, I can’t judge that the woman in the photo is the Yang Mouxia seen in the video today. If the two are the same person, then the woman is 52 years old. If the two are not the same person, why did Dong lie to the civil affairs department?

Deng Fei posted on Weibo that he received photos of Yang Mouxia and Dong Zhimin’s outdated marriage certificate from netizens. (Photo by Deng Fei Weibo)

Comparing the video screenshots of the mother of eight children exposed on the Internet recently, many netizens said that they are two completely different people, both in appearance and temperament. The people have long suspected that the “Mother of Eight” is Li Ying, a Sichuan girl who went missing in December 1996.

Some netizens thought it was a fake document: no marriage certificate number; no ID card number for both parties; first stamped and then signed; the woman’s surname “Yang” was mistakenly written as “Yang”; the ink was not dry;

Some netizens said, what kind of person can get Dong Zhimin’s marriage certificate at this time? There is still no news regarding the two women who went to the hospital to deliver flowers. How might anyone dare to forge Dong Zhimin’s marriage certificate and send it to reporters at this time? The point is who is this woman in this photo? This woman looks nothing like the mother of eight in the video.

Deng Fei posted on Weibo that he received photos of Yang Mouxia and Dong Zhimin’s outdated marriage certificate from netizens. (Photo by Deng Fei Weibo)

Outside comments pointed out that the two major departments of the local public security and civil affairs were suspected of forging ID cards.

Current affairs commentator Tang Jingyuan believes that this ID card is obviously forged, and the local public security department is suspected of collaborating with Dong Zhimin to forge the ID card. When both the public security and civil affairs departments are suspected of participating in the fraud, how can we believe that the address of “Yagu Village, Fugong County, Yunnan Province” recorded in the marriage data is the source of Xu Ziba?How can we believeXuzhouAre the official DNA test results real?

Deng Fei posted on Weibo that he received photos of Yang Mouxia and Dong Zhimin’s outdated marriage certificate from netizens. (Photo by Deng Fei Weibo)

JiangsuFeng CountyRelevant personnel of the Propaganda Department responded to Caixin on the 15th, saying that they have paid attention to the marriage registration information of Yang Mouxia published by former investigative reporter Deng Fei Weibo and the public opinion caused by it, and said that “Dong Moumin and Yang Mouxia’s marriage registration It’s illegal.”

Previously, the Xuzhou authorities had issued four notices, stating that Yang Mouxia and Dong Zhimin were originally “legal husband and wife”, and finally changed their words to say that Dong Zhimin and others were suspected of “unlawful detention” and “unlawful detention”.Traffickingwomen’ sins.

The Xuzhou bulletin was read by nearly 1 billion people (webpage screenshot)

On February 7th, Xuzhou city officials issued a circular for the third time. Regarding the identity of Yang Mouxia, the circular said that the investigation team had checked the marriage registration application materials of Dong Moumin and Yang Mouxia and found that it contained “Yagu Village, Fugong County, Yunnan Province.” ”, and immediately sent personnel to Yunnan for verification.

The report stated that Yang Mouxia’s original name was “Xiaohuamei” (parents deceased), and he was from Yagu Village, Fugong County, Yunnan Province. “Xiaohuamei” married in Baoshan City, Yunnan Province in 1994. After her divorce in 1996, she returned to Yagu Village. At that time, she showed abnormal speech and behavior. Sang from the same village took “Xiaohuamei” to Jiangsu for treatment. After the two arrived in Donghai County, Jiangsu Province, “Xiaohuamei” went missing. At that time, Sang did not call the police or inform “Xiaohuamei”‘s family.

However, former “Yunnan Information News” reporters Massa and Tiemu recently went to Yagu Village and Puluo Village in Fugong County, Yunnan Province to conduct on-the-spot interviews to find out the truth. The announcement of the so-called field investigation is a lie.

In addition, Beijing lawyer Hao Yachao issued a document questioning the Xuzhou report, which is full of loopholes and seriously violates common sense.

Lawyer Hao Yachao said Xuzhou’s report contradicted itself. His acceptance of “Yagu Village, Fugong County, Yunnan Province” on the marriage registration goes once morest basic common sense. In fact, the address information is not trustworthy at all! Xuzhou’s investigation capability is insufficient, and it is a serious mistake to use this information as the direction of investigation.

She said that “Sang Moumou”‘s statement seriously violated common sense and should not be accepted. This statement does not meet the “high probability” standard of proof in civil litigation, nor does it meet the standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt” in criminal litigation, but Xuzhou accepted it without a comprehensive investigation into the family of “Xiao Huamei”!Its level of investigation is not convincing enough, and it is even suspected of covering up “suspectedTraffickingThe crime of women” Sang.

Tang Jingyuan said that the “eight-child mother” incident has continued to ferment until now, which has caused official panic. At the same time, the control efforts on the Internet are obviously increasing. The stability maintenance this time is at the central level. The fundamental reason is that if the truth of the case is announced, it is very likely to have the effect of pulling out the radish and bringing out the mud. The industrialized sex slave trafficking case involving the Xuzhou local government may cause a major earthquake.

Responsible editor: Hu Yulong#