2023-11-22 20:55:39
But Purzycki, who days earlier had announced he would not seek a third term in 2024, and Mills had miscalculated. More than 75 supporters of a residency law packed council chambers downtown, many speaking forcefully for it. After listening for four hours, Mills decided to hold his bill.
Since that night, other efforts surfaced in council to water down the residency law. One measure would have required that Wilmington employees live within three miles of city limits. Another expanded the residency area to include all of New Castle County. Both ideas were voted down in a council committee.
Finally, last week, a bill sponsored by Councilwoman Shané Darby reaffirmed the current five-year requirement, though it did amend the law by giving new employees a full year to move into the city.
After yet another meeting packed with supporters for the residency requirement, Darby’s measure passed in an eight to one vote with three abstensions. One member was absent. Bills require seven “yes” votes to become law.
The bill also creates a residency assistance fund to help new employees with security deposits, down payments, signing bonuses, and relocation fees. The amount of the fund will be decided during the city’s annual budget process.
Purzycki, who raised the ante himself more than a month ago by publicly proclaiming that the rule was no longer in effect, has been unusually quiet on the issue. His chief spokesperson, John Rago, has not responded to several requests for comment then, and that silence continued this week.
Congo said City Council’s upholding of the residency rule shows the power of residents voicing their opinions publicly. Several speakers at the recent council sessions have told members that if they vote against residency, they will have targets on their backs in the 2024 election.
“I think the public made a huge difference,” the council president said. “There are several council members who were dead set, honestly, on voting for no residency. But I think that the way the public turned out and some of the things that they were saying just resonated with some council members and they were able to change their minds. I think this was 100% due to the public.”
Purzycki still has until Monday, Nov. 27, to issue a veto, a move which would require a vote of nine council members to overturn. If he doesn’t veto, the new requirement with a one-year grace period to move into the city will be the law.
Congo said he doubts the mayor will keep fighting the issue, and Darby said she suspects Purzycki will let it become law without his signature.
Darby, a first-term member of council who was instrumental in organizing residents to descend on council chambers and voice their opinions, said the amended law that passed last week bill gives the administration more tools to persuade people to take jobs and live in a city that they keep touting as a great place to live.
“We’re a city trying to be rebuilt and we think about what’s happening at the riverfront and downtown with hundreds of new apartments being built,’’ Darby said. “We also think about the other residential areas that need that thriving community. There’s a lot of vacant homes here. There’s crime. So getting people to stay here with well-to-do or very well-to-do income will benefit our city.”
1700688017
#Wilmington #Mayor #Purzycki #loses #bid #residency #rule