Once once more, the territory is back Nagorno-Karabakh The dispute between Azerbaijan and Armenia came to the surface, following the escalation by Baku, on the grounds of the killing of one of its soldiers in a shooting in the buffer zone that was identified After the war between the two sides in the year 2020.
Azerbaijan accused the separatists supported by Armenia of firing, following which the clashes began, which, if they continue, might enter the region in new war It topples the fragile truce imposed by the Moscow agreement on November 10, 2020 between Baku and Yerevan, according to which Russian peace forces were deployed in the region. While Moscow went through its Defense Ministry to accuse Azerbaijan of violating the ceasefire, adding that its peacekeepers deployed in the region are trying to “stabilize” the situation.
The ministry announced that “in the Saribaba region, the Azerbaijani armed forces violated the ceasefire,” adding that “the leadership of the Russian peacekeeping force, together with representatives of Azerbaijan and Armenia, is taking steps to achieve stability.”
Moscow’s words were not left unanswered by Baku, and all accusations were directed once morest the separatist factions in the Nagorno-Karabakh region, and demanded the necessity of disarming these factions. While the European Union went to the necessity of a ceasefire and a return to negotiations to come up with a peaceful solution to the conflict, whose fire began to flare up once more from the ashes of the 2020 war, which toppled the Minsk Agreement, which was held between all the intertwined parties in this conflict in the nineties of the last century, especially with Azerbaijan’s control of the Much of the territory in this region is at the cease-fire and has caused a major political crisis for the Armenian government, which bowed to the will of Russian President Vladimir Putin and agreed to the November 2020 agreement.
tense date
The history of this tension in this geopolitically important region in the South Caucasus dates back to the beginning of the thaw of the Cold War, and the independence of the former Soviet Union countries, and their taking the form of nation-states, which blew up the situation between Armenia and Azerbaijan, the two enemy neighbors, and even before the fall of the red flag with a red flag. Scythe and hammer from the roof of the Duma in Moscow.
In 1988, the demands of the ruling authorities in the Nagorno-Karabakh region began to be part of Soviet Armenia, at a time when this region was self-governing by decision of Stalin, at a time when the region was administratively subordinate to the Soviet Azerbaijani authorities.
The snowball of this conflict began to swell and grow since that date of the claim, up to the war between Baku and the Armenian separatists backed by Yerevan, which ended with a ceasefire in 1994, following the Armenian separatists took control of most of the territory, which seems to have left a wound that did not heal when Azeris.
This round of war ended, as did the round that followed in the year 2020, to a ceasefire agreement called the “Minsk Agreement”, which was mediated by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, despite the intermittent clashes that had occurred between the two parties for 26 years, which is the age of the “Minsk Agreement”. Which fell with the entry of the Azerbaijani forces into the region in the year 2020, in a new round of war that this time carried the scent of the geopolitical ambitions of the regional powers in the region, most notably Turkey, the eternal enemy of the Armenians, which supported Baku, it seems that Putin found only one way out to stop this war. By putting pressure on all parties, and reaching a ceasefire in the November 2020 agreement.
A second round in which Baku won, with Ankara behind it with all its military arsenal and modern technologies that have proven its efficiency, while Al-Ain is heading towards the Azeri coasts, where gas and oil are two weapons that the Russian war on Ukraine proved to be important in consolidating any policy on the European “other” who refused to join Turkey to the European forum.
