Indian batsman Rohit Sharma broke the 23-year-old record of former Pakistan captain Wasim Akram during the Test match against South Africa.
India and South Africa are playing the first Test of the three-Test series in Visakhapatnam where Indian batsman Rohit Sharma has set several records while playing against the visiting team.
Wasim Akram’s 23-year-old record
Rohit Sharma broke the 23-year-old record of former Pakistan captain and all-rounder Wasim Akram by hitting 13 sixes in a Test.
Wasim Akram hit 12 sixes while playing against Zimbabwe in 1996, but it should be noted that Rohit Sharma hit a total of 13 sixes in both innings of the Test match while Wasim Akram hit 12 sixes in just one innings while five Due to the end of the day, the Pakistan team could not get a chance to play the second innings.
Rohit Sharma scored centuries in both innings of this Test and in doing so surpassed former Australian batsman Don Bradman to record a batting average of over 100 on Indian soil.
Sir Don Bradman had the distinction of scoring at an average of 98.22 at his home ground.
Rohit Sharma also made another unbeaten record in this match, becoming the first Indian batsman to be stumped in both innings.
#Rohit #Sharma #break #Wasim #Akrams #record #surprised
**Interviewer:** Rohit Sharma’s incredible performance in the recent Test match not only brought him two centuries but also saw him break Wasim Akram’s long-standing record with 13 sixes in a Test. How do you feel about Rohit surpassing such a remarkable record that stood for over two decades?
**Guest:** It’s truly a monumental achievement for Rohit Sharma. Hitting 13 sixes in a match is no small feat, especially when you consider that Akram managed his 12 sixes in just one innings. Rohit’s ability to not just break but exceed this record shows his evolution as a player. He’s not only rewriting the record books but also setting a new standard for the future.
**Interviewer:** Given that Rohit’s performance also surpassed Don Bradman’s batting average in India, do you think this places him in the conversation for being one of the greatest batsmen in the history of cricket?
**Guest:** Absolutely! When you compare averages, especially against players like Bradman, it creates a compelling argument for Rohit’s greatness. His consistency on home soil, combined with performances like these, should definitely make cricket fans reconsider their all-time greats list.
**Interviewer:** One interesting detail to note is that Rohit also became the first Indian to be stumped in both innings of a Test. This seems to reflect his aggressive style of play but could also imply some risks. What are your thoughts on that dichotomy?
**Guest:** That’s the nature of modern cricket, isn’t it? Players like Rohit are taking calculated risks to up the scoring rate and entertain the crowd. While getting stumped in both innings is unusual, it highlights his willingness to take chances. It does raise a debate—should traditional metrics of play adapt to the evolving style, or do we risk losing some aspects of the game?
**Interviewer:** These records and performances certainly spark conversation. Do you think records like these enhance the competitiveness of the game, or could they lead to unrealistic expectations from upcoming players?
**Guest:** It’s a double-edged sword. On one hand, records inspire younger players to strive for greatness; on the other hand, they can create pressure. The discussion around this balance is crucial. Do we celebrate these achievements as benchmarks or do we risk overshadowing the achievements of other talented players?
**Interviewer:** That’s an intriguing point and a topic worthy of further debate among fans and analysts alike. What do you think, readers? Does Rohit Sharma’s historic feat elevate him above Akram and Bradman in discussions of cricket’s elite, or does it set an unrealistic precedent for upcoming cricketers? Share your thoughts!
