Trump, the 45th US President in the period between 2017 and 2021, and now the 47th President-elect, deprived Democratic candidate Kamala Harris of winning the presidential seat, and deprived her Democratic predecessor, Grover Cleveland, of assuming the rank of US President for two non-consecutive terms.
During his first presidential term, Donald Trump did a lot and did not spare several parties alike in the allied camp, such as NATO members, whom he pressured to increase their financial contribution to the costs of their “protection.”
In the adversary camp, we mention the cancellation of the nuclear agreement with Iran and the trade war he declared against China.
At the same time, Trump tried to reach an agreement with the North Korean leader and met with him three times in 2018, 2019 and 2021.
Grover Cleveland, Donald Trump’s successor to two non-consecutive presidencies, was the first Democrat to reach the presidency after the Civil War. He assumed the American presidency from 1885 to 1889, then returned again as president from 1893 to 1897.
Grover, who came to politics as a lawyer, managed to evade military service at the height of the Civil War by hiring a substitute in the form of an immigrant from Poland.
On the international scene, Cleveland’s first presidential term was conflict-free. The president at the time was adhering to non-interference in the affairs of other countries, and in the economic field, he was able to achieve a budget surplus of $100 million.
On the other hand, his Republican opponents accused him of not adequately protecting American manufacturers from the influx of foreign goods into the American market. This disagreement was crucial to the election campaign of 1888.
Cleveland, who was preparing for re-election, was blocked, some believe, by a telegram from the British ambassador wishing him victory. Republicans considered this “British interference in the elections.” Cleveland then lost the presidential race to Republican Benjamin Harrison.
After transferring his powers to the American president-elect, Grover Cleveland returned to practicing his racing career in New York. However, as the end of the four years approached, he increasingly criticized the Harrison administration, and announced in 1892 his willingness to run in the elections and return to the presidency.
On November 8, 1892, Grover Cleveland achieved a sweeping victory over Harrison, thus becoming the first president in the history of the United States to return to the White House for the second time with an interval of time.
However, Cleveland’s second term was not successful, as the United States suffered from a stock market crash and labor strikes as a result of Grover’s support of big capital.
In that era, the number of presidential terms was not limited in current legislation, but Grover Cleveland was suffering from health problems in addition to low popularity, so he did not enter the next presidential race.
As for Donald Trump, he is facing more tense and more complex situations on the international scene in his second term, which will begin early next year, than in his first term. How will he deal with China, North Korea, and Iran? How will he deal primarily with the explosive situations in the Middle East and the Ukrainian conflict? These are the main questions that arise in this anxious era in world history.
Source:
#Trump #anxious #era
**Interview with Political Analyst Jane Smith on Trump’s Non-Consecutive Terms**
**Interviewer**: Welcome, Jane! It’s a historic moment with Donald Trump being elected as the 47th President, joining Grover Cleveland in a very exclusive club of non-consecutive presidencies. What does this mean for American politics?
**Jane Smith**: Thank you for having me! Donald Trump’s victory is monumental, not just because he secured a non-consecutive second term but also due to the implications it has for the political landscape. It showcases a unique form of voter loyalty and sentiment that has followed him, reminiscent of Grover Cleveland’s era.
**Interviewer**: Speaking of Grover Cleveland, he was a unique figure in his own right, facing a very different America. How do you think Trump’s policies and style of governance compare to those of Cleveland?
**Jane Smith**: Well, Cleveland’s presidency was marked by a focus on fiscal conservatism and non-interventionist foreign policy, while Trump has been known for his aggressive approach in both domestic and international arenas. For example, Trump’s pressure on NATO allies and trade wars with China starkly contrasts with Cleveland’s relatively conflict-free foreign policy. Trump’s approach often leaned into direct confrontation, notably with Iran and North Korea, which created significant geopolitical tension.
**Interviewer**: That’s a great point. During his first term, Trump faced opposition, and many considered his policies quite divisive. Do you anticipate a similar polarization during his second term?
**Jane Smith**: Absolutely. Trump’s return to the presidency likely means more division in American politics. His previous tenure saw significant clashes, not just with Democrats but also within the Republican Party. His second term may exacerbate these tensions. Additionally, his inclination to sidestep traditional political norms could lead to even more contentious debates in Congress.
**Interviewer**: In the article, it was noted that Cleveland faced accusations for not protecting American manufacturers adequately. Do you think Trump’s protectionist policies differ in effectiveness or reception?
**Jane Smith**: Trump’s protectionist policies have garnered mixed responses. While they aimed to bolster American manufacturing and jobs, they were often criticized for leading to trade wars that hurt certain sectors of the economy. Unlike Cleveland, whose non-interventionism was reassuring to some, Trump’s bold moves have been polarizing. His supporters laud him for prioritizing American interests, while detractors argue they could lead to short-term gains at the cost of long-term relationships and economic stability.
**Interviewer**: Lastly, what legacy do you believe Trump is trying to carve out that might parallel Cleveland’s?
**Jane Smith**: Trump is likely trying to frame himself as a transformative figure who challenged the political status quo, similar to Cleveland. He appeals to a significant portion of the populace that feels disenfranchised. However, while Cleveland managed to secure a budget surplus and maintain peace, Trump’s legacy may be judged on his ability to unify a fractured party and whether his policies yield sustainable success rather than just short-lived victories.
**Interviewer**: Thank you, Jane! Your insights provide valuable context to this historical moment in American politics.
**Jane Smith**: Thank you for having me! It’s certainly going to be an interesting few years ahead.
