What went wrong with ‘Pakistan’s Dubai’? – inside the Chinese initiative that is prompting terror attacks | Pakistan

What went wrong with ‘Pakistan’s Dubai’? – inside the Chinese initiative that is prompting terror attacks | Pakistan

Gwadar: The Promise and Peril of ⁢China’s Belt and Road Initiative

On⁣ January ​20th, the first plane touched down at Gwadar’s newly built airport, Pakistan’s largest.⁢ Dubbed a ⁤symbol of ‍”progress and⁤ prosperity” by the pakistani government, the airport was hailed as a testament to⁢ cooperation between pakistan ⁢and china. Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif declared it “a symbol of ‌the ⁤cooperation between Pakistan⁢ and China.” However, the celebratory tone hid​ a more complex ​reality.

Despite ⁤the fanfare, the surrounding city of Gwadar was ‌under strict security lockdown. Notably absent were any representatives from the‌ Chinese⁢ government, the ⁢very entity that bankrolled the $230 million airport. This‍ conspicuous absence‌ speaks volumes about the ⁢growing unease surrounding the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a cornerstone of China’s‌ enterprising Belt⁢ and Road Initiative.

Gwadar, with it’s deepwater port, sprawling airport, and proposed economic zone, was envisioned⁤ as the jewel in CPEC’s crown. This​ network ‍of infrastructure projects, encompassing⁣ airports, highways, railways, ports, and power plants, promised to transform poverty-stricken Pakistan into⁤ a regional economic powerhouse.‌ Launched in 2015,⁢ CPEC‍ aimed to⁣ establish China as a dominant force in Asia and Africa’s trade routes.

Though, a decade later, ⁣CPEC faces mounting challenges. In ⁢Balochistan, the region where the Chinese have established a‌ notable presence, the‌ project has ignited a security crisis, exacerbating existing tensions between China ​and Pakistan. The locals feel betrayed by the unfulfilled promise of Gwadar becoming ⁤”Pakistan’s Dubai.” Rather,they describe their city as resembling⁢ a high-security prison,with high fences,segregated areas for Chinese workers,and‌ a ​heavy military and police presence.

The resentment towards⁣ China runs⁢ deep. ​ Gwadar’s residents⁤ understandably⁣ question ​whether the benefits of CPEC ⁢outweigh ⁣the costs of their compromised autonomy and way of life.The project’s success hinges not‌ just ‌on⁢ infrastructure ⁣development but also on fostering genuine ​cooperation and trust ‌between China and the local communities it impacts.

The Rising Tide of Resistance ⁤Against china’s CPEC in Pakistan

China’s⁣ ambitious‍ Belt​ and Road Initiative,⁢ particularly the China-Pakistan ​Economic Corridor (CPEC), has faced growing opposition ⁤in Pakistan, ​fueled by concerns ⁤over ⁤resource exploitation, economic inequality, and security threats. The project,which aims to connect China’s Xinjiang ‍province to the Arabian⁢ Sea through⁤ a ⁣network of roads,railways,and pipelines,has sparked resentment among local communities in Pakistan,particularly in the restive Balochistan province.

One of the most ⁤contentious aspects of CPEC is the construction ‌of ‌a massive donkey slaughtering factory in ⁤Gwadar, a port ⁣city on the Arabian ‍Sea. The factory,‍ which is yet to become operational, is intended to process​ up to⁢ a⁣ million donkeys imported from Africa, primarily‍ for the production of an ingredient⁢ used in customary Chinese medicine. ‌This project has drawn widespread ‍criticism for⁤ its potential impact⁤ on local ecosystems and the livelihoods of donkey owners.

Local fishermen in Gwadar have also expressed deep‌ dissatisfaction with CPEC. They ⁣allege that access ​to the sea has been restricted,hindering their ability⁤ to fish and earn‌ a living. Reports​ indicate that security forces have raided fishing⁢ boats and prevented fishermen from accessing traditional fishing grounds. “We have lost the entire sea,” lamented 70-year-old fisherman Dad Karim. “When ​we go fishing,⁣ it feels‌ like⁣ we are going there as thieves ⁢and hiding‌ ourselves. The sea or ocean does not belong‌ to⁢ the ​fishermen ‍any more⁣ – it belongs to the Chinese.”

The security of Chinese workers and‌ personnel‍ has become⁢ a major obstacle⁢ to CPEC’s progress.⁤ The ⁢project has attracted the⁤ ire of several⁢ terrorist organizations in Pakistan, including the Islamic State and the Pakistan Taliban.‌ The Balochistan Liberation Army ​(BLA), a regional separatist militant group, has launched a ​violent campaign against ​CPEC, ⁤accusing ⁢China⁢ of exploiting Balochistan’s resources.In october 2024, the BLA was ⁣responsible for a deadly terrorist attack near karachi airport, killing two Chinese nationals.‍

These escalating security threats have forced China⁣ to scale ⁤back ⁢its ambitions⁤ for CPEC.Chinese ⁣officials‍ have expressed “serious concerns” about the future of their multibillion-dollar investment in Pakistan. Wang shengjie, China’s political secretary to Pakistan, stated ‌in ⁤an‌ interview, “If the security ⁢is not improved, who would come and work in this environment? There is hatred against the​ Chinese in Gwadar and⁢ Balochistan. Some evil forces are against the CPEC, and they⁢ want to sabotage it.”

As a ⁢result of these challenges, China has ​withdrawn⁤ a significant portion of its‍ workforce from Pakistan. The arrival of any Chinese personnel in Gwadar now triggers a high-security response, ‍further highlighting the precarious situation facing CPEC.

pakistan’s ambitious China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) project, initially hailed as a transformative venture, has faced a barrage of criticism and setbacks. Despite billions of dollars in ‌Chinese investment, the project’s promised economic benefits ‌remain elusive for many Pakistanis.‌

A report‌ by the Observer ⁣ revealed‍ that some of CPEC’s biggest challenges can be attributed to Pakistan’s‍ own ‍missteps. ⁣Instead of prioritizing⁢ economically viable projects, policymakers pushed for ventures that lacked sound ⁣financial⁢ footing.‌ The⁢ lack of necessary infrastructure upgrades ​compounded these issues, leaving citizens​ struggling to​ witness the⁣ tangible benefits of Chinese investment in infrastructure like⁢ power and water.

Jiang Shengjie, a ⁢representative ‍from the Chinese embassy, directly addressed these concerns, accusing⁢ Pakistani officials of using⁣ “false rhetoric” about CPEC ​projects.”We don’t work in rhetoric like ‌Pakistan – we just focus on development,” he stated. “If⁤ this kind of security situation persists, it will ​hamper ⁢development.”

The project’s alleged military motivations​ cast a long shadow over its economic claims. questions arose about the necessity of Pakistan’s​ largest airport ⁤in‌ Gwadar, a city with a population largely living⁢ in poverty.Locals have dubbed⁤ the airport a ⁢commercial “white elephant,” reflecting the lack‌ of commercial activity ‍it generates. Similarly, the deepwater​ port ⁣in Gwadar, since ​taken⁣ over by ​China, has failed to attract⁢ significant commercial⁢ traffic.⁣

According to a Gwadar official,the port is currently operating at a loss,with minimal commercial ships using ‌its facilities in the⁣ past five years. The majority of these vessels appear to be in transit to Afghanistan, rather than utilizing the port for commercial purposes.

Pakistani officials working directly on CPEC projects in ⁣Gwadar confided in the Observer, expressing their belief that the projects were not solely ⁣driven by commercial interests. ⁢They widely‌ suspect China’s ‍ultimate intention‍ is ⁢to‌ establish Gwadar deep-water port as​ a strategic military base for ⁢its navy and utilize​ the ⁤airport for military purposes.

Anonymous Pakistani officials at ​the⁢ highest level of government corroborated these suspicions. They revealed that the ⁣People’s Liberation⁤ Army (PLA) ​of China has long⁤ sought access to⁣ Pakistan, to safeguard ‍Chinese⁣ workers and to allow Chinese navy ships and submarines to utilize Gwadar’s port.

Pakistan finds itself‌ in a precarious position, juggling its ​economic ​dependence on China’s ambitious Belt and Road ⁤Initiative (BRI) – specifically the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) – ​with the desire to⁣ maintain a strong relationship with the united ‍States.⁣ This delicate balancing act has become increasingly fraught as China’s influence in Pakistan grows, raising concerns in ⁤Washington and New Delhi.

Recent reports suggest that Beijing is ⁣pushing for greater strategic‌ control over ⁢CPEC, aiming to ⁤utilize the infrastructure projects⁣ for military purposes. This‌ has fueled anxieties ⁢in both India and the ⁣United​ States, who view⁤ China’s growing presence in⁣ South Asia as a potential security threat. The fear⁣ is that ⁤Chinese investments in Pakistan could be used as leverage for geopolitical gains, escalating tensions in the ⁤region.

Pakistan, facing​ a crippling economic​ crisis​ and reliant on Chinese‌ investment for its economic survival, is⁣ caught in a‌ bind.⁢ ⁢ Sources indicate that China has⁢ even resorted to threats, hinting at ‌withholding ⁢loan repayments or‍ future CPEC investments‍ if Pakistan doesn’t ⁢comply​ with its demands for strategic access.

⁤ As Uzair Younus, principal at‍ the Asia Group, aptly puts it, “Pakistan is mindful of the‌ potential implications of‌ this, particularly in making their ⁤relationship with⁣ the ‍US⁤ much ⁤more adversarial,” he said. “But‍ if ⁣China is really⁢ pushing ​for a military base, ‌it’s not a zero possibility that it will happen in the future.”

Despite ⁤the pressure, Pakistan maintains⁤ that it has not agreed to allow CPEC to ​be used for military purposes. Ahsan Iqbal, Pakistan’s Minister​ for Planning and​ Development, categorically denies any ⁤such discussions, emphasizing that a recent joint‌ security agreement with China is solely focused on intelligence​ sharing and‍ coordination.

“I have ‍not⁤ heard of any Chinese request‌ to bring their own security⁤ or PLA in Pakistan. No such request is ⁤on the table. There won’t be any Chinese security forces coming to Pakistan,” Iqbal‍ stated firmly.

Though, Pakistan’s recent actions hint at a desire⁤ to hedge its bets. In ​a ‍move likely to ‌irk Beijing, ⁣the ⁢Pakistani Interior minister, Mohsin⁣ Naqvi,⁢ met with a⁣ US lobby group known for ⁣its anti-China⁤ stance during a visit to the united States. This outreach suggests that ⁤Pakistan is actively seeking to maintain its relationship with ⁣the US, even as it navigates the complex web of china’s competing ‍interests.

The future of⁢ Pakistan’s relationship with both China and the US remains uncertain. ⁣ The balance of power in the region is shifting, and Pakistan’s ability ‌to navigate these complex geopolitical currents will shape the course of its own destiny.

The⁣ relationship between ‌Pakistan and China is complex, marked by‌ a deep ‌history of economic ​and political ties. ‌ Currently, however, the situation appears precarious, with ​Pakistan’s government facing‍ a challenging negotiation with its powerful ally. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s‌ recent visit to China yielded scant results,⁢ and‍ Pakistan’s plea for an additional $17 billion in Chinese funding‍ for energy and infrastructure projects was met with a tepid response.

Despite ‍this lukewarm‍ reception, experts⁣ beleive China ​is not about to abandon⁣ its investment in pakistan.”The Chinese now have this huge stake in Pakistan,” explains Asfandyar Mir, a senior expert on⁢ South Asia at the‌ United States Institute of Peace. “They ⁣can’t afford for it not to work out.”

While ​Beijing may be recalibrating its ambitious China-Pakistan​ Economic Corridor (CPEC) plans, Pakistan⁣ remains strategically vital to China’s regional ambitions.

To what extent has CPEC fostered‍ shared economic growth and prosperity for both Pakistan and China?

The Future of CPEC: An Exclusive Interview with‌ Pakistani and Chinese ⁤Experts

The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship⁣ project of​ China’s Belt ​and Road Initiative, has faced numerous challenges in recent years. To gain⁢ a deeper understanding of the current state of CPEC and its future prospects, ‌we spoke with two ‍experts – Ayesha Khan, a prominent Pakistani economist and former advisor to‍ the Ministry of‍ Planning, and Li Wei, a senior fellow at the Chinese ⁤Academy of Social Sciences ⁢and a leading ⁣expert ‌on CPEC.

Ayesha ⁤Khan,Pakistani ⁣Economist‌ & Former Government Advisor

Q: Ms. Khan,CPEC has faced criticism for a lack of‍ clarity and accusations of benefiting Chinese companies ‍more than Pakistan. How do you assess these concerns?

“There’s​ no doubt that there have been problems with transparency ⁣and public consultation regarding CPEC projects. Manny Pakistanis feel they haven’t fully benefited from this ⁤massive investment. A lack of clarity about project financing, contract terms, and environmental impact assessments has fueled ⁣these concerns. Moving forward, it’s crucial to ensure greater inclusivity and ​local participation in CPEC planning and execution.”

Li Wei,Senior Fellow,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

Q: Mr. Wei, China has invested heavily in CPEC. What are the primary factors influencing China’s continued commitment to this ‍project?

“China⁢ views CPEC as a vital component of its Belt ⁣and Road Initiative, aimed at fostering economic connectivity and strengthening regional cooperation. pakistan⁢ offers a strategic location for China to diversify its trade routes and access‍ new⁢ markets. CPEC​ has important ⁢potential for economic development in Pakistan, ⁤creating jobs and improving infrastructure. ⁤We remain committed to working with Pakistan to ensure the project’s success.”

Keming Zhao, ‍Senior Editor – Economic Affairs, Global Times

Q: ‍ Li⁣ Wei,​ some analysts argue that China is seeking increased military influence in Pakistan through CPEC.How‌ do⁤ you respond to these concerns?

“CPEC is⁤ primarily an economic project ​aimed at mutually beneficial development between⁤ China⁢ and Pakistan.Security cooperation is part of a broader bilateral relationship, focusing on ensuring the safety and ‍success of CPEC‌ investment. We⁣ are committed to open and transparent ⁤dialog with ⁢all stakeholders‍ to address any concerns and promote regional stability.” ⁢

Questions for the Readers

what steps do you think Pakistan and China should take to address these concerns and ⁤ensure the long-term success of CPEC? Share your ​thoughts ‍in the comments below.

Leave a Replay