Dutch Parliamentarian Gat Wilder of Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan and Tehreek-e-Labaik Ya Rasoolullah Leaders Saad Razavi And has filed a case against Maulana Ashraf Asif Jalali in the Amsterdam High Court, which will be heard on Monday September in the Amsterdam High Court.
In one of his recent tweets, Geet Wilders wrote that ‘next week, Monday, the historic trial will be held at the Amsterdam High Court.’
In this trial conducted in the Netherlands, Saad Rizvi and Ashraf Asif Jalali are accused of issuing a fatwa to kill Gate Wilder on the charge of blasphemy to the Muslims of the Netherlands and the whole world and said that the Dutch parliamentary gate Wilder insulted by planning a cartoon competition in 2018.
“This is the first time Pakistani clerics and political leaders will face trial in the Netherlands for issuing a fatwa against a Dutch member of parliament,” Gat Wilder added. I will appear and address the court on Monday.’
Gat Wilders is a Dutch politician who founded and led the right-wing populist Party for Freedom in 2006. He is also the leader of the party in the House of Representatives, and has held a parliamentary seat since 1998.
The Gat Wilders are known for their right-wing populism, anti-immigration, opposition to Islam and Euroscepticism, and their ties to Russia. His views have made him a controversial figure in the Netherlands and abroad. Since 2004, they have been protected at all times by armed police.
In this regard, Independent Urdu contacted Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan, but they have refrained from giving their position on this for now. While Maulana Ashraf Asif Jalali of Tehreek Labeek or Rasoolullah was contacted several times, but no response has been received from him either.
Is there any legal status to this case?
In this regard, Barrister Shahzad Khan while talking to Independent Urdu said that there are two things in this. One is that it is not within the jurisdiction of the court of the Netherlands to prosecute a Pakistani citizen and the other is that the crime has not yet been committed, so how can this case be prosecuted, that too in the absence of anyone.
According to Barrister Shahzad Khan, this is called a one-sided proceeding in our country which has no significance. At most, both governments can communicate to each other that your citizen has threatened our citizen, so ensure that our citizen is not harmed by your citizen.
This section contains related reference points (Related Nodes field).
He said that there is an element of intimidation in this case, it is a crime but it needs to be proved beyond doubt in the court. ‘How would that be possible in this case? Here, a case was registered in the Netherlands, that too against a Pakistani citizen, so it is not within the jurisdiction of the court. She cannot prosecute this court, that is the first problem in this case.’
He further said that you can punish someone only when both parties are present in the court. Those who have been accused in this case should also present their arguments in the court. There is no such thing here, so there can be no punishment.
Speaking to Independent Urdu, Advocate Ahmar Majeed said: ‘In this case, the accused are not present, so the case can be tried and sentenced in their absence, but there is no extradition between Pakistan and the Netherlands. There is no (extradition) agreement that Pakistan is bound under international law to arrest the two men and hand them over to the Netherlands if they are convicted there.
“Even if there was an agreement, it was not possible because it is a matter of religion. However, if they are sentenced and their arrest warrants are issued by Interpol, then there will be problems in their international travel, such as these people will not be able to go to Europe, America, etc.
#legal #status #case #Saad #Rizvi #Netherlands
2024-08-29 05:28:40
