Wezemaal Residents Raise Concerns About Inadequate Lighting on Temporary Bridge
Table of Contents
“it seems the generator has been switched off on several occasions, likely due to noise concerns. We have made efforts to position the generator away from residential areas.”
— Thomas Baeken, Infrabel Councilor Demuynck acknowledged the importance of addressing noise concerns but stressed that safety should be the top priority.Demuynck suggested exploring alternative solutions, such as quieter generators or solar-powered lighting, to strike a balance between the needs of residents and safety considerations. While appreciating Infrabel’s efforts, Councilor Demuynck expressed dissatisfaction with the current situation, stating that more must be done to ensure the safety and comfort of all residents. Demuynck assured residents that they woudl continue to work with Infrabel to find a solution that adequately addresses their concerns. The situation has raised significant questions about the prioritization of safety and the need for adequate lighting on temporary structures. Residents of Wezemaal have voiced concerns about inadequate lighting on the pedestrian bridge installed at the train station in early December. The bridge serves as a temporary passage while Infrabel undertakes a full renovation of the station.
Wezemaal Bridge Lighting: A safety Concern?
Concerns have been raised by residents of Wezemaal regarding the inadequate lighting on the temporary pedestrian bridge at the town’s train station.Councilor Nele Demuynck (ROX) has been vocal about these concerns,describing the bridge as “strikingly dark,” especially during evening hours. While the municipality participated in initial discussions about the bridge, responsibility for its construction and maintenance, including lighting, ultimately lies with Infrabel, the Belgian railway infrastructure manager. Demuynck emphasized the paramount importance of resident safety, stating, “My primary concern is ensuring the safety of our residents, and proper lighting is crucial for that.” On being alerted to the issue, Demuynck immediately contacted Infrabel, urging them to address the lack of adequate lighting. infrabel spokesperson Thomas Baeken explained that the generator powering the temporary lights had likely been switched off due to noise complaints from nearby residents. Demuynck acknowledges the need to balance safety concerns with the well-being of residents affected by noise. She suggests that Infrabel consider alternative solutions, such as quieter generators or even solar-powered lighting, to ensure both safety and minimize disturbance. However, she remains unconvinced that the current situation adequately addresses resident safety concerns and pledges to continue pressing Infrabel for a more satisfactory solution. demuynck encourages residents to continue voicing their concerns and working collaboratively with officials to find a solution. “Safety is paramount,” she stresses, “and we will work tirelessly to ensure a well-lit and secure passage for everyone.” What do you think? Is adequate lighting on temporary structures a priority? Should the need for quiet be prioritized over safety concerns? Share your thoughts in the comments below.Wezemaal Pedestrian Bridge Lighting Sparks Concern
Wezemaal Pedestrian Bridge Lighting Sparks Concern
## Dimly Lit Bridge Sparks Safety Concerns in Wezemaal
**Interviewer:** Welcome to Archyde News, Councilor Demuynck. Thank you for joining us today. We’re discussing the concerns raised by residents regarding the temporary pedestrian bridge at the Wezemaal train station, specifically the issue of inadequate lighting.
**Councilor Demuyck:** It’s a pleasure to be here. The lighting situation on this bridge has become a meaningful safety concern for residents, especially during evening hours. As a councilor representing the people of Wezemaal, I share their anxieties and have been actively pursuing a solution.
**Interviewer:** You personally experienced the dimly lit conditions on the bridge. Could you elaborate on your experience?
**councilor Demuyck:** Indeed,just recently while dropping off my daughter,I was struck by how dark the bridge actually was. The lack of adequate lighting made it feel unsafe and perhaps hazardous, especially for pedestrians, children, and the elderly.
**Interviewer:** Infrabel, the organization responsible for the bridge installation, has stated that they installed temporary lighting connected to a generator. However, it appears there have been instances where the generator was turned off. what are your thoughts on this?
**Councilor Demuynck:** While I understand the importance of addressing noise concerns from nearby residents, safety must always be our top priority. I appreciate Infrabel’s attempts but simply turning off the lights creates a more dangerous situation, especially after dark.
**Interviewer:** have you explored choice solutions with Infrabel?
**Councilor Demuynck:** We have discussed exploring other options, such as quieter generators or even solar-powered lighting. These solutions could potentially address both the noise concerns and ensure adequate lighting on the bridge.
**Interviewer:** What message do you have for the residents of Wezemaal who continue to express their concerns about the bridge’s lighting?
**Councilor Demuynck:** I want to assure them that I am committed to working with Infrabel to find a permanent solution that guarantees the safety and comfort of all residents. This is not simply about a bridge, it’s about ensuring a safe environment for everyone in our community.
**interviewer:** Councilor Demyuynck, thank you for your time and insights.
**Councilor Demuynck:** You’re welcome.
