Our test was primarily conducted in heavy traffic in Lima. The vehicle was occupied by one or two people, representing a maximum weight of 140 kg, and on one occasion, we drove it with five passengers on board. Additionally, the air conditioning was always set to minimum, and we almost always drove in Normal mode.
We drove the top-of-the-line Prime CVT 2WD version, which, while offering the best features, is also the heaviest. It has a net weight of 1,589 kg, while its entry-level LTZ MT version weighs 1,490 kg. This means it is 99 kg heavier. In fact, this top-of-the-line version has an average weight compared to other SUVs in the segment, such as the Kia Sportage or Hyundai Tucson. Beyond this detail, it is also important to consider that the net weight does not include a full tank, which in this case is 52 liters of Premium or 96-octane gasoline.
Before testing the vehicle, we expected to achieve a range of 415 kilometers, as this is the autonomy we observed on the instrument panel during our initial interaction. Regarding this data, it is important to note that the vehicle’s computer or control unit projects an autonomy based on the **recent** driving style, road conditions, air conditioning usage, weather, among other factors.
The worst consumption recorded was 11.6 L/100 km or 34 km/gallon. (Photo: Fernando Roca)
/
In our case, we drove with the intention of maximizing range and achieving the best fuel consumption. We drove in a relaxed manner, avoiding revving the engine to its maximum potential. It is not mechanically sound to buy a low-capacity vehicle and expect to drive it like a race car.
With this driving style, with two people on board and driving in traffic conditions, our best consumption was 7.6 L/100 km or 54 km/g, while our worst consumption in the same situation, but with five people on board, was 11.6 L/100 km or 34.5 km/g. Regarding range, we traveled **380 km in the city**, leaving a margin of just under 40 km before needing to refuel.
Our best consumption was 7.6 L/100 km or 54 km/gallon. (Photo: Fernando Roca)
/
With these results, the Captiva XL’s performance is within the average of its rivals (400 km), but it should be noted that the aforementioned rivals have a fuel tank that is almost a gallon larger. A potential point of improvement for the Captiva XL would be to increase its tank capacity to 55 or 57 liters.
Now, considering our best city consumption (54 km/g) and maintaining a constant speed, we might drive around **700 km on the road**, which is a good figure considering the vehicle’s dimensions.
About the engine
Engine capacity is very important, especially in a segment where potential buyers analyze these details. In this case, it uses a 1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine that generates 148 hp at 5,500 rpm and 250 Nm of torque between 1,600 and 3,600 rpm, paired with a continuously variable transmission (CVT).
The 1.5-litre turbo engine uses a timing belt. (Photo: Fernando Roca)
/
When driving, the first thing we notice when pressing the accelerator is an optimal initial response, but with some turbo lag below 2,000 rpm. As we reach medium speeds, we perceive a progressive acceleration in Normal mode and a more agile response in Sport mode. At high speeds (100 km/h), there is a greater demand on the engine, which is noticeable by a louder sound.
Measuring 1.72 cm, we fit snugly into the third row of seats, which we consider functional for people or children up to 1.60 cm tall. (Photo: Fernando Roca)
/
Perception of the mechanics
The steering is electronically assisted, resulting in smooth steering. It has disc brakes on all four wheels, which feel somewhat soft during the first seconds of braking, but then become more resistant.
The front suspension is independent, McPherson type, and the rear, torsion beam type. This setup provides a smooth ride in the city, but at high highway speeds, it feels a bit stiff. However, we believe it filters well what happens below and absorbs city imperfections.
It features a high-resolution 360° camera. (Photo: Fernando Roca)
/
Handling in the city is good, as it is not overly large, and its 360° camera system helps us avoid hitting the body in tight areas. The height provides a clear view of traffic, and the large windows are appreciated. Rear visibility is not optimal, but we have a rear camera with guide lines and sensors.
Equipment and price
As mentioned earlier, this is an updated version of the Captiva. The main changes are in its equipment. For instance, it now includes a 10.4″ vertical screen, a 7″ LED cluster, seats with perforated eco-leather upholstery, a panoramic sunroof, 18″ two-tone Prime alloy wheels, LED headlights, six airbags, an electric handbrake, stability control, and traction control.
Inside, the car offers a modern cabin and ample space for the front and second-row seats. (Photo: Fernando Roca)
/
Finally, this Prime CVT version is available in the Peruvian market for US$27,990, while the entry version is available for US$22,990.
Chevrolet Captiva XL: Fuel Consumption and Performance Review
We conducted a comprehensive test of the Chevrolet Captiva XL in the bustling city of Lima, Peru. Our aim was to evaluate its fuel consumption and overall performance, shedding light on its everyday practicality for potential buyers. The vehicle was driven under various conditions, including city traffic, with a varying number of passengers, and always with the air conditioning set to minimum. Here’s a detailed account of our findings:
Testing Conditions and Key Parameters
The test was conducted with the top-of-the-line Prime CVT 2WD version, which, despite its superior features, is also the heaviest. It boasts a net weight of 1,589 kg, while the entry-level LTZ MT version weighs 1,490 kg, a 99 kg difference. This top-of-the-range version, however, has an average weight compared to other SUVs in the segment, such as the Kia Sportage or Hyundai Tucson. Furthermore, the net weight does not include a full tank, which in this case is 52 liters of Premium or 96-octane gasoline.
Initially, we expected a range of 415 kilometers based on the autonomy displayed on the instrument panel during our first encounter with the vehicle. It’s worth noting that the vehicle’s computer or control unit projects autonomy based on the last driving style, road conditions, use of air conditioning, weather, and other factors.
Fuel Consumption and Range: City Driving
Our goal was to maximize autonomy and achieve the best fuel consumption; hence, we drove in a relaxed manner, avoiding excessive revving of the engine. We understand that purchasing a compact vehicle doesn’t necessitate aggressive driving.
With two people on board and navigating city traffic, we achieved a best consumption of 7.6 L/100 km or 54 km/g. Conversely, with five passengers, the worst consumption in the same scenario was 11.6 L/100 km or 34.5 km/g. In terms of autonomy, we covered 380 km in the city, leaving a margin of just under 40 km before needing to refuel.
Fuel Consumption and Range: Road Driving
Extrapolating from our best city consumption (54 km/g) and maintaining a constant speed, we anticipate a range of around 700 km on the road. This is a commendable figure considering the size of the vehicle.
Engine Performance and Characteristics
Engine capacity is a crucial factor that potential buyers carefully analyze, particularly in this segment. The Chevrolet Captiva XL is powered by a 1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine, delivering 148 hp at 5,500 rpm and 250 Nm of torque between 1,600 and 3,600 rpm, paired with a continuously variable transmission (CVT).
On the road, the engine responds promptly at start-up, though some turbo lag is noticeable below 2,000 rpm. Upon reaching moderate speeds, acceleration is progressive in Normal mode and more spirited in Sport mode. At higher speeds (100 km/h), the engine works harder, which is evident in the increased engine noise.
Mechanical Experience
The steering is electronically assisted, resulting in smooth steering. The vehicle features disc brakes on all four wheels, offering a soft initial braking sensation that gradually transitions to a more resistant feel. The front suspension is independent, McPherson type, and the rear uses a torsion beam setup. This combination provides a comfortable ride in the city, but at highway speeds, it feels somewhat stiff. Nonetheless, it effectively filters out road imperfections and vibrations encountered within urban environments.
Handling in the city is impressive, as the vehicle is relatively compact, and its 360° camera system enhances maneuverability in tight spaces. The height provides a clear view of traffic surroundings, and the large windows contribute to visibility. However, rear visibility is slightly limited, though a rear camera with guide lines and sensors provides assistance.
Key Features and Pricing
The Chevrolet Captiva XL represents an update to the previous model. Notable additions include a 10.4″ vertical screen, a 7″ LED cluster, seats with perforated eco-leather upholstery, a panoramic sunroof, 18″ two-tone Prime alloy wheels, LED headlights, six airbags, electric handbrake, stability control, and traction control.
The Prime CVT version is currently available in the Peruvian market for US$27,990, while the entry-level version starts at US$22,990.
