“We call for the adoption of a national protocol guaranteeing the anonymity of whistleblowers in the field of child protection”

“We call for the adoption of a national protocol guaranteeing the anonymity of whistleblowers in the field of child protection”

2024-11-20 14:30:00

Protecting children is a fundamental collective duty. Every day, thousands of professionals work to identify and report cases of mistreatment, neglect or abuse. Doctors, teachers, social workers: they all play a crucial role in protecting those who cannot defend themselves. However, these women and men who look after children are themselves vulnerable when they fulfill this mission.

Indeed, the commitment of health and child care professionals to the protection of minors is an essential but risky responsibility. When doctors choose to send “concerning information” (PI) to the competent authorities to alert them of a potential danger concerning a minor, they themselves expose themselves to reprisals from the family circle. This reality, although little known, is increasingly common and alarming. On the occasion of the International Children’s Rights Daywe wish to alert the public authorities to the dysfunctions of this system.

In 2022, violence against doctors increased by 23% compared to the previous year, according to the national council of the order of doctors. And this scourge does not stop with caregivers: social workers, educators, teachers, all face an escalation of violence that compromises their commitment.

Read also | Article reserved for our subscribers Violence against caregivers: the medical order points to an “unprecedented” increase in reports

Read later

This figure reveals a deep crisis. The increase in physical and verbal attacks, particularly following reports of abuse, highlights the lack of protection enjoyed by health and child care professionals who are on the front line defending the interests of children in danger.

A trap

Let’s take the example of a general practitioner confronted with a case of mistreatment. Although convinced of the urgency of protecting the child, she knows that transmitting “worrying information” could attract reprisals from the family concerned. Should she risk her personal safety to save this child or stay silent at the cost of allowing a dangerous situation to continue?

Read also | Article reserved for our subscribers “The rights of children, particularly the youngest and most vulnerable, must be remembered, respected and promoted”

Read later

The current legislative framework, governed by the code of social action and families, requires doctors to transmit worrying information, without anonymity. However, this transparency, designed to ensure the traceability of reports, becomes a trap when doctors are threatened. Although a 2013 text regulates the procedure, it offers no real protection to those who choose to denounce worrying situations.

You have 47.18% of this article left to read. The rest is reserved for subscribers.

1732663729
#call #adoption #national #protocol #guaranteeing #anonymity #whistleblowers #field #child #protection

Leave a Replay