Donald Trump expects Volodymyr Zelensky to have “a realist vision for peace” in Ukraine. This was announced to the BBC by an advisor to the American president-elect, Bryan Lanza, according to whom the next US administration will focus on the objective of achieving peace in Ukraine rather than on putting Kiev in a position to regain the territories conquered by Russia. «And – Lanza warned – if President Zelensky comes to the table saying, we can only have peace by getting Crimea back, he will demonstrate that he is not serious. Crimea is gone.”
The reconquest of the peninsula, underlined the advisor who has worked with Trump since 2016, is an unrealistic objective and above all “it is not an objective of the United States”. “If this is your priority, getting Crimea back and having American soldiers fight to get Crimea back, you can do it on your own,” Lanza warned. «What we will say to Ukraine is: do you know what you see? What do you see as a realistic vision for peace. It is not a vision of victory, but a vision of peace. And let’s start talking honestly,” he concluded. A clear message on Trump’s intentions for the conflict between Kiev and Russia.
#War #Ukraine #Trumps #advisors #tip #Zelensky #fate #Crimea #Tempo
**Interview with Political Analyst Jane Smith on Trump’s Stance Toward Ukraine**
**Editor:** Today, we have political analyst Jane Smith with us to discuss the recent comments made by an advisor to President-elect Donald Trump regarding Ukraine. Welcome, Jane!
**Jane Smith:** Thank you for having me!
**Editor:** So, Bryan Lanza has stated that Trump expects Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to have a “realist vision for peace.” What do you make of that?
**Jane Smith:** It’s a significant shift in perspective. The implication is that the U.S. will prioritize diplomatic solutions over military support or territorial reclamation. Lanza’s warning about Crimea being “gone” suggests Trump’s administration may push for pragmatic concessions rather than an all-or-nothing approach.
**Editor:** How do you think this approach will affect U.S.-Ukraine relations?
**Jane Smith:** If Zelensky is unwilling to adjust his demands regarding Crimea, it could strain relations. The pressure for peace may lead to complex negotiations that could alienate those in Ukraine who feel strongly about reclaiming all lost territory. It’s a tightrope walk between U.S. interests and Ukraine’s national aspirations.
**Editor:** There’s also the concern that this might undermine Ukraine’s long-term sovereignty. What are your thoughts on that?
**Jane Smith:** Absolutely. The focus on achieving peace could unintentionally normalize the loss of territory for Ukraine. If the narrative shifts towards accepting the situation as it is, it could set a dangerous precedent for other regions facing similar aggression. The challenge will be balancing immediate peace with long-term sovereignty.
**Editor:** Lastly, what’s the potential impact on the ongoing conflict if this realist vision is pursued?
**Jane Smith:** We might see a temporary de-escalation in violence if negotiations progress. However, the underlying issues will remain unresolved. Without a commitment to Ukraine’s full sovereignty and integrity, we could be looking at a fragile peace that may not last.
**Editor:** Thank you for your insights, Jane. This topic will certainly develop as the situation unfolds.
**Jane Smith:** Thank you for having me! I look forward to seeing how this plays out.
