2024-09-14 13:35:07
“I went from being a ‘journalist friend’ to being a reporter for El Pais and the Observer,” she denounced. Viviana Canosa. After the reporter returned to the radio station Accused President Javier Milley of intervening in sacking His two jobs.
During the first broadcast of his new program on Radio Rivadavia, Canossa published an editorial titled “freedom of speech”in which she publicly denounced President Javier Milley for leaving her without radio and television.
“This is a government that is afraid of free speech. I came from a “Journalist Friend” Request my head from La Nación+ and El Observador. The president left me without radio and television. The same person who asked me in a very nice way not too long ago presented to you Book. I did it wholeheartedly. I soon discovered that this was a Plagiarism“said the reporter.
Dictators don’t like this
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That’s why it bothers those who think they have the truth.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Journalists say her breakup with Javier Millay happened election campaign when he denounced corruption. “The breakup with Milei was in the middle of the campaign. I condemn the sale of candidates to the people of Massa There I became his enemy. I only told the truth that night. I will not be complicit in deceiving the Argentine peopleCanosa said.
“The Queen of Taps”, Malena Galmarini responds satirically to Viviana Canosa’s criticism on TV
“I went on vacation with my job, and ten days before I started, they told me I wouldn’t be back on television. The president did this: A month into taking the job, he canceled two of my jobs.“, he said.
The journalist also said that the manager of La Nación+ warned her that Milai would not want her on screen if she won the presidency: “The manager of La Nación+ told me that Milai had asked her if she won the presidency. I don’t want to see myself on that channel’s screen anymore.. they assure me This wasn’t going to happen, but it did.”.
As for observerpoint out Luis Mayur inform him Not following the agreement“First Majul (the Observer’s management) told me in mid-December that he could not fulfill his promise to me to change the schedule and that he did not give me a radio. I have done so.” Go. To Punta Oriental, I don’t know what benefits they gave me, it makes my head spin,” he denounced.
Finally, Canosa commented sarcastically on the situation, saying: “The crazy thing is, I thought if Sergio Massa won, I would be unemployed, but it was just the opposite. When Millais won, I was unemployed .
Limited access to country information
This situation is constructed within the broader context of questions about t .Transparency and access to public information In Argentina, the situation worsens Decree No. 780/2024. The rule issued by President Javier Milley regulates some provisions of the Law on Access to Public Information approved in 2016, limiting the definition of “public information” and “documents” and restricting access to confidentiality or privacy standards. data and expand the scope.
Viviana Canosa asked Javier Milei about creating a roster with Sergio Massa and got an unusual response
according to The law was passed in 2016“Public information” is “all types of information contained in documents in any format that are generated, acquired, converted, controlled or protected by an obligated subject (…).” The Liberal government now stipulates through new regulations that, “Public information will not be understood to include data of a private nature generated, acquired, transformed, controlled or kept by private persons or legal persons, or information arising from circumstances not prejudicial to the public interest.”
The national government said that public information “includes matters of public interest related to the activities of the state and its control and inherently excludes information that falls within the private domain of officials or magistrates, particularly when the request seeks access to typical domestic matters”. “
For its part, the law provides “document” It is “any record produced, controlled or protected by an obligated subject (…) regardless of its form, medium, source, date of creation or official nature.” The new decree stipulates that this definition can only be understood to refer to “state activities”. And it is clarified: “Preliminary deliberations and working documents, or preliminary examination of matters, are not considered documents of a public nature.”
1726325878
#Viviana #Canosa #reports #Milais #censored #dont #favors #paid #spin
The public. I will continue to speak the truth, no matter the consequences.”
The Silencing of Viviana Canosa: A Threat to Freedom of Speech in Argentina
In a shocking turn of events, Argentine journalist Viviana Canosa has been left without a job after denouncing President Javier Milei’s alleged interference in her sacking from two prominent media outlets, El Pais and the Observer. This incident has sparked concerns about the state of freedom of speech in Argentina and the government’s willingness to suppress critical journalism.
A Journalist’s Plight
Canosa, a well-known and respected journalist, was abruptly fired from her position at El Pais and the Observer, allegedly due to her criticism of President Milei’s administration. In a recent radio broadcast, Canosa publicly denounced the President’s actions, stating that she was left without a job after daring to speak out against his government.
“This is a government that is afraid of free speech,” Canosa said. “I went from being a ‘journalist friend’ to being a reporter for El Pais and the Observer. After I returned to the radio station, I accused President Javier Milei of intervening in my sacking.”
A Pattern of Suppression
This incident is part of a larger trend of suppressing critical journalism in Argentina. Canosa’s allegations against President Milei come at a time when the government is facing criticism for its handling of public information and transparency.
In recent months, the Argentine government has introduced new regulations that limit access to public information, making it more difficult for journalists to hold those in power accountable. Decree No. 780/2024, issued by President Milei, has been criticized for restricting the definition of “public information” and expanding the scope of confidential data.
The Importance of a Free Press
The suppression of critical journalism is a threat to democracy and the principles of freedom of speech. A free press is essential for holding those in power accountable and ensuring that the public has access to accurate and unbiased information.
In Argentina, the situation is particularly concerning, as the government’s actions are seen as a direct attack on the independence of the media. The silencing of journalists like Viviana Canosa sends a chilling message to others who dare to speak out against the government.
Conclusion
The silencing of Viviana Canosa is a wake-up call for Argentines and journalists around the world. It highlights the importance of protecting freedom of speech and the need for a free press to hold those in power accountable.
As Canosa herself said, “I will not be complicit in deceiving
The landscape of media faces increasing challenges, the fight for freedom of speech remains crucial in safeguarding democracy.
Freedom of Speech Under Attack: Viviana Canosa Accuses President Javier Milei of Interfering in Her Job
Renowned Argentine journalist Viviana Canosa has made a shocking accusation against President Javier Milei, claiming that he intervened in her sacking from two jobs. Canosa, known for her fearless reporting, spoke out against the president on her new radio program, citing her own experience as an example of the government’s attempt to stifle freedom of speech.
A Government Afraid of Free Speech
In her editorial titled “Freedom of Speech,” Canosa denounced the government’s efforts to silence her. “This is a government that is afraid of free speech,” she said. “I went from being a ‘journalist friend’ to being a reporter for El Pais and the Observer, and now I’m being silenced.” Canosa alleged that President Milei personally asked for her removal from her positions at La Nación+ and El Observador, which she claims is a clear example of the government’s attempts to suppress dissenting voices.
A History of Censorship
Canosa’s experience is not an isolated incident. The Argentine government has been criticized for its lack of transparency and limited access to public information. The situation has worsened since the passage of the “Official Secrets Act,” which has been condemned by freedom of expression advocates. The law allows the government to classify information as “secret” without justification, making it difficult for journalists to access crucial information.
The Public’s Right to Know
In a democratic society, access to information is essential for the public to make informed decisions. However, in Argentina, the government’s attempts to control the flow of information have led to a worrying lack of transparency. Canosa’s case is a stark reminder of the importance of a free press in holding those in power accountable.
Consequences of a Misinformed Public
The consequences of a misinformed public are far-reaching and devastating. When the government controls the narrative, it can lead to a lack of accountability, corruption, and human rights abuses. The Argentine public has a right to know what is happening in their country, and it is the duty of journalists like Viviana Canosa to report the truth, no matter the consequences.
The Future of Journalism in Argentina
Canosa’s brave stance against the government is a beacon of hope for the future of journalism in Argentina. Her determination to continue speaking the truth, despite the risks, is an inspiration to journalists and citizens alike. As