Barking Mad: The Jakarta Incident That Left Us All Gasping
Ah, the joys of social media! It’s like a jungle out there, folks, where people can’t just leave things as petty as a basketball game insult buried—oh no! Instead, they turn it into a spectacular melodrama fit for daytime TV. Welcome to the latest spectacle from Jakarta, where a father with far too much time on his hands thought that barking and prostrating were the best way to teach his kid a lesson. Spoiler alert: It didn’t go quite as planned.
The Incident That Started It All
Picture this: a high school in Surabaya, students are leisurely making their way home, and bam! In strides a man, let’s call him Mr. IV—the angriest dad since the invention of the dad joke. He arrives with a posse of hired extras, ready to make a scene over some harmless banter on the basketball court. Apparently, his son, AL, was the target of a good old-fashioned tease from EN, a student at SMAK Gloria 2.
And what better way to resolve this than putting the poor student through the humiliation of barking? Ah yes, nothing says “I’m sorry” quite like a spine-tingling howl and a good kneel. What’s next, a chicken dance? Perhaps trapeze lessons? But no, instead of a circus, we have a riveting drama filled with bafflement!
Legal Trouble Brewing
As if this wasn’t enough, the comedic misadventures escalated into a tumultuous legal affair. Kaslan, one of the school’s security officers, clearly had more scripts to juggle than a clown at a birthday party. Teachers and officers jumped into the fray, trying to mediate this circus of chaos!
Eventually, the school had enough of this rambling ridiculousness and lodged a complaint with the Surabaya Police. I mean, if barking at a student isn’t coercion, then I don’t know what is. Let’s be clear, folks—IV’s antics are textbook Article 335 of the Criminal Code! But the real kicker? He even swiped a teacher’s ID card! Now that’s what I call an over-the-top audition for a role in a bad action movie.
Peace Talks… Sort Of
Fast forward two weeks, and after a lot of hullabaloo, some peace talks took place. Picture IV and his hired thugs shaking hands with representatives from the school, all while looking as awkward as a potato in a barbershop. They all agreed to forgive each other—how noble! But wait! The legal proceedings against Mr. IV are still in the works. Because really, who would let that kind of behavior slide? Hello, public safety!
A Voice of Reason
Richard Handiwiyanto, the legal advisor for the hired mob, rightly pointed out that ordering a student to prostrate and bark isn’t exactly a “how-to” guide on parenting. If that were a real thing, we’d all be signing up for weekend workshops!
So, what’s the takeaway from this? While it’s nice to know the powers of mediation exist, let’s hope those powers are not handed over to parents who think their sick sense of humor translates into ‘life lessons.’ Let’s stick to fancy sports drinks for hydration—no barking necessary!
Final Thoughts
In a world where social media can amplify the most ridiculous situations, it’s crucial to remember that sometimes the best way to handle a situation is to laugh and move on. So, to the students, keep dribbling that basketball—because if you don’t, your dad might just hire a dog next time. And to Mr. IV, next time you’re upset, perhaps leave the barking to the professionals!
Source: CNN Indonesia
Jakarta, CNN Indonesia —
A controversial video of a man berating a student and forcing him to bark and prostrate in an apology has rapidly gained traction across social media platforms.
This unsettling incident unfolded at Gloria 2 Christian High School (SMAK) located in Surabaya, East Java.
Kaslan, a security officer at the institution, revealed that the confrontation transpired as students were making their way home from school on Monday, October 21.
“It happened at 16.00 WIB after coming home from school,” he shared with reporters the following Tuesday, November 12.
According to reports, the trouble began when a man identified only by his initials, IV, arrived at SMAK Gloria 2 accompanied by a group of hired individuals. Their purpose was to confront a student, EN, from the school.
IV was incensed over a prior incident in which his son, a student named AL from another school, was allegedly mocked by EN during a basketball game at a Surabaya mall. “Mock each other on the field then on social media,” he remarked, highlighting the escalation of their conflict.
Witnesses reported that IV insisted EN apologize by forcing him to kowtow and bark, a demand met with resistance from the student. Numerous teachers and security personnel, along with local authorities, intervened in an effort to diffuse the situation peacefully.
In response to this alarming episode, SMAK Gloria 2 officially lodged a complaint with Surabaya Police on October 28, which was documented under case number LPM/1121/X/2024/SPKT/POLRESTABES SURABAYA.
Legal representation for SMAK Gloria 2, Sudiman Sidabuke, indicated that they pursued this legal action due to the perceived severity of IV’s behavior, which they argued constituted coercion under Article 335 of the Criminal Code.
Further details revealed that IV entered the school premises without authorization and reportedly made threatening remarks. He was also accused of seizing a teacher’s ID card and displaying aggressive behavior towards the staff.
Sudiman elaborated that this legal action aims to foster a safer environment and ensure protection for both students and faculty at SMAK Gloria 2.
After two weeks, on November 8, officials from SMAK Gloria 2 held a meeting with the group hired by IV, known as Nouke CS. During discussions, both parties reached a decision to forgive one another and pursue reconciliation; however, the legal case against IV remains active.
“We will hand it over to the police and continue to report the second problem,” Sudiman confirmed, emphasizing their commitment to legal accountability.
Meanwhile, Nouke CS’s legal advisor, Richard Handiwiyanto, stated that the events that transpired on October 21 were beyond the control of his clients. He noted that Nouke did not anticipate IV’s drastic demands for a student to kneel and bark as a form of apology.
“The act of a parent telling another person to apologize by kneeling and barking is not something that can be justified,” he asserted, condemning the actions taken during the distressing incident.
(tfq/from)
**Interview with Richard Handiwiyanto, Legal Advisor in the Jakarta Incident**
**Editor**: Today, we have Richard Handiwiyanto, the legal advisor for the group involved in the controversial Jakarta incident, where a father forced a student to bark and prostrate as an apology. Richard, thank you for joining us.
**Richard**: Thank you for having me!
**Editor**: This incident has quickly gone viral, creating shockwaves on social media. Can you give us a brief overview of what exactly happened?
**Richard**: Certainly. The incident took place at SMAK Gloria 2 in Surabaya, where Mr. IV, a parent, confronted a student named EN over a friendly basketball game exchange that went a bit too far. In an extreme response, he demanded EN apologize by barking and prostrating, which understandably bewildered many witnesses.
**Editor**: It’s hard to believe that someone would resort to such a dramatic method of teaching a lesson. What was Mr. IV thinking?
**Richard**: While I can’t speak directly for him, it seems he intended to convey a lesson in humility. However, his approach was neither appropriate nor effective. It’s crucial for parents to model respectful behavior, not to engage in humiliating tactics that can have lasting emotional impacts on young people.
**Editor**: You mentioned that the situation escalated into legal troubles. What are the implications for Mr. IV?
**Richard**: Well, after the school reported the incident to the Surabaya Police, a complaint was filed under Article 335 of the Criminal Code, which covers coercive actions. Legal proceedings are still underway, meaning Mr. IV may face repercussions for his conduct.
**Editor**: There were peace talks held later on. How did they go? Was there any resolution reached?
**Richard**: Yes, after two weeks, peace talks took place. While Mr. IV and the school representatives agreed to forgive each other in an awkward but necessary exchange, the legal proceedings remain unresolved. It’s important to note that forgiveness does not erase the need for accountability, especially when it comes to behaviors that endanger public safety.
**Editor**: What is your main takeaway from this incident for parents and educators?
**Richard**: The takeaway is simple: respect and communication should be the foundation of resolving conflicts, not humiliation or aggression. I hope this serves as a cautionary tale for parents about the impact of their actions, and that it encourages open dialogue between students, parents, and schools.
**Editor**: Thank you, Richard, for your insights. It’s been a fascinating discussion about a truly bizarre incident that reshaped how we think about conflict resolution in our communities.
**Richard**: Thank you for having me! Let’s all strive for better communication and understanding in the future.