The Mexican Government pays $110 per month, for six months, to Venezuelan migrants who return to their country in the “Return to the Homeland” plan, as a result of an agreement signed with Nicolás Maduro, revealed the Mexican Foreign Minister, Alicia Bárcena. The Mexican opponent Gerardo Priego Tapia came out to criticize the measure when in his country “there are 55 million people in poverty.”
The Foreign Ministry had already announced in December the resumption of the repatriations of Venezuelans in Mexico with support under said Mexican programs linked to ‘Return to the Homeland’, according to EFE.
But now Bárcena detailed that there are agreements with the Venezuelan Empresas Polar y Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA), as well as Mexican companies in that country, such as Bimbo or Femsa, to welcome returned migrants as apprentices.
“We give them six months of a stipend, it is more or less 110 dollars a month, which is wonderful for them, and then there is an incentive for them to return, we have already managed to repatriate a very important number of Venezuelans“, described the diplomat.
For his part, the former PAN candidate for the governorship of Tabasco, Gerardo Priego Tapia, attacked President Andrés Manuel López Obrador and called him a “wimp” for the “Vuelta a la Patria” program that helps Venezuelan migrants.
On his social networks, he criticized that the Mexican government has to pay $110 for six months to Venezuelans who agree to return to their country, when there are 55 million people in poverty in the country.
«What’s wrong with this bastard, who told him that Mexico’s money is his, doesn’t he remember that there are 55 million people in poverty in this country, why the hell is he wasting money on other people, who unfortunately are going through a difficult time? problem yes, but we have 55 million people in this country, what’s wrong with this idiot«he added.
This agreement occurred in the face of the growth of irregular migration through Mexico, which rose 77.2% in 2023 to exceed 782,000 people, of which the main country of origin was Venezuela, with almost 223,000, an annual increase of 131.81%, according to statistics from the Government’s Migration Policy Unit.
#call #AMLO #wimp #helping #Venezuelan #migrants
Analysis: Mexico’s “Return to the Homeland” Plan – A Necessary Move or a Politically Motivated Decision?
The recent announcement by Mexican Foreign Minister Alicia Bárcena regarding the “Return to the Homeland” plan has sparked a mix of emotions and raised several questions. The plan, which offers Venezuelan migrants $110 per month for six months to return to their country, has been met with criticism from Mexican opponents, including Gerardo Priego Tapia. As a news writer, I will delve into the reasons behind this decision and its implications.
Firstly, it’s essential to understand the context behind this plan. According to [[1]], Mexico and Venezuela had previously paused repatriation flights of Venezuelan migrants in Mexico. However, due to US pressure to curb migration, the countries announced the resumption of flights in December. This plan appears to be an extension of those efforts.
On the one hand, the “Return to the Homeland” plan can be seen as a humanitarian gesture, providing financial support to Venezuelan migrants who wish to return to their country. The number of Venezuelan refugees and migrants is staggering, with [[2]] reporting thousands of individuals seeking asylum or refuge. The plan may alleviate some of the pressure on Mexico’s resources and provide an opportunity for migrants to return to their families and rebuild their lives.
On the other hand, the plan has been criticized for its timing and the decision to allocate funds to migrants while millions of Mexicans live in poverty. As Priego Tapia pointed out, around 55 million people in Mexico live in poverty, and some might argue that the government should prioritize addressing these domestic issues before spending money on migrant repatriation. Moreover, the plan’s eligibility criteria and selection process are unclear, which may lead to perceptions of unfairness or favoritism.
Furthermore, the deal signed with Nicolás Maduro’s government raises concerns about the Venezuelan migrants’ safety and human rights. The political situation in Venezuela is complex, and some might argue that the plan could be seen as a move to silence critics or undermine opposition forces. [[3]] highlights the difficulties faced by Venezuelan families seeking asylum and the impact of US asylum policies on these individuals.
the “Return to the Homeland” plan is a multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration of its motivations, implications, and potential consequences. While it may provide some relief to Venezuelan migrants, it also raises concerns about the plan’s fairness, effectiveness, and the impact on Mexico’s poverty-stricken population. As more information becomes available, it is crucial to monitor the plan’s implementation and evaluate its outcomes to ensure that it aligns with the best interests of all parties involved.
