Venezuelan Election Insider Reveals Truth Behind Manipulative Strategies

Venezuelan Election Insider Reveals Truth Behind Manipulative Strategies

Juan Carlos Delpino, one of the directors of the National Electoral Council of Venezuela (CNE), confirmed from exile that the regime of Nicolás Maduro committed irregularities to deceive the Venezuelan people and commit fraud in the presidential elections that took place on July 28.

In an interview with “Noticias Caracol”, reported by the MSN portal, Delpino said that he is well and “safe”, although under strict care because he had to flee his country.

He explained that in the middle of the counting that was being carried out that day, he received a communication warning him about a hack that had occurred in the system, which prevented him from continuing with a transmission that was at 58%.

The official said he refused to go up to the “totalization” room, a place where the transmission center is located.

At each polling station, there was a machine that, when the polling stations closed, was responsible for transmitting the results, a process that could have peaks until the percentage that makes the result irreversible is reached.

“I am asked to go to totals, which I refuse to do, given that 58% is not what is traditionally done. You declare the result after passing over 95%, in such a way that the trend would have been irreversible,” he commented.

The CNE director said that in addition to this strange situation, he was also receiving other information indicating irregularities in the voting centers: many electoral witnesses were evicted and others were also unable to have the minutes in their possession.

“That’s why I refuse to go up to the counting room because I don’t know what I’m going to find there, and there is too big a margin of votes to generate the bulletin that was given out after 12 at night, with the argument that there was 80% there,” he said.

#Venezuela #Senior #electoral #official #reveals #trickery
2024-09-12 07:37:24

Venezuela ‌election ‍results 2024

Venezuela’s Presidential Election Marred by Allegations of⁣ Massive Fraud

The recent presidential election in Venezuela, held on July 28, ⁣has been shrouded in controversy, with allegations of massive fraud and irregularities. Juan Carlos Delpino, one of the directors of the National Electoral Council ⁣of Venezuela​ (CNE), has‍ confirmed ‍from⁤ exile that the regime of Nicolás‍ Maduro committed fraud to deceive the Venezuelan people.

According to Delpino, he received​ a ‍communication warning him about a hack that had occurred in the system, which prevented him from‍ continuing with‍ a transmission that was at 58% [1]. He refused to go to the⁢ “totalization” room, where ‌the transmission center is located, citing that 58%​ is not traditionally the threshold to ⁤declare the ‍result [1].

Delpino’s allegations ⁣have sparked widespread concerns about the legitimacy‍ of the election. Many experts have described the election as “the largest electoral fraud in Latin America” [2]. The liberal opposition candidate, Edmundo⁤ González, was expected to win‍ the election, according to polls, ⁣but the results announced by the CNE were in favor of the ‌incumbent [1].

The⁣ controversy surrounding the election has‍ led to questions about ​the credibility of the electoral process. International observers have raised concerns about the lack of transparency​ and the vulnerability of the electoral system to hacking [3]. ‍The official results have been​ disputed, with many calling the election a “fake,​ fabricated result” [3].

The allegations of fraud have serious⁤ implications ⁣for the ‍future of Venezuela’s⁣ democracy. The country has⁢ been plagued by economic‌ and‍ political‍ instability, and the disputed election has only added to the uncertainty.

As the international community continues to scrutinize the⁣ election, it remains to be seen whether​ the allegations of fraud will be​ investigated and addressed. The Venezuelan people deserve a free and fair election, and it is up to the ​authorities to ensure ⁣the integrity of the democratic process.

References:

[1]

[2]

[3]

Keywords: Venezuela, presidential election, fraud, Nicolás‌ Maduro, Juan Carlos ⁤Delpino, ⁤National Electoral Council of‌ Venezuela (CNE), Edmundo González, democracy, transparency, international ‌observers.

Here are some People Also Ask (PAA) related questions for the title:

Venezuela’s Presidential Election Marred by Allegations of Massive Fraud

The recent presidential election in Venezuela, held on July 28, has been shrouded in controversy, with allegations of massive fraud and irregularities. Juan Carlos Delpino, one of the directors of the National Electoral Council of Venezuela (CNE), has confirmed from exile that the regime of Nicolás Maduro committed fraud to deceive the Venezuelan people.

According to Delpino, he received a communication warning him about a hack that had occurred in the system, which prevented him from continuing with a transmission that was at 58%. He refused to go to the “totalization” room, where the transmission center is located, citing that 58% is not traditionally the threshold to declare the result[[[1](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3w658z4403o)]. He explained that in the middle of the counting that was being carried out that day, he received a communication warning him about a hack that had occurred in the system, which prevented him from continuing with a transmission that was at 58%.

Delpino’s allegations have sparked widespread concerns about the legitimacy of the election. Many experts have described the election as “the largest electoral fraud in Latin America”[[[2](https://www.eunews.it/en/2024/08/06/chaos-venezuela-election-eu-maduro/)]. The liberal opposition candidate, Edmundo González, was expected to win the election, according to polls, but the results announced by the CNE were in favor of the incumbent[[[1](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3w658z4403o)].

The controversy surrounding the election has led to questions about the credibility of the electoral process. International observers have raised concerns about the lack of transparency and the vulnerability of the electoral system to hacking[[[3](https://verfassungsblog.de/elections-venezuela-2024/)]. The official results have been disputed, with many calling the election a “fake, fabricated result”[[[3](https://verfassungsblog.de/elections-venezuela-2024/)].

The allegations of fraud have serious implications for the future of Venezuela’s democracy. The country has been plagued by economic and political instability, and the disputed election has only added to the uncertainty.

As the international community continues to scrutinize the election, it remains to be seen whether the allegations of fraud will be investigated and addressed. The Venezuelan people deserve a free and fair election, and it is up to the authorities to ensure the integrity of the democratic process.

References:

[1] BBC News. (2024). Venezuelan court upholds Maduro’s disputed victory. [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3w658z4403o](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3w658z4403o)

[2] Euronews. (2024). Chaos in Venezuela after alleged election fraud, EU to Maduro: “No judicial intimidation against opposition”. [https://www.eunews.it/en/2024/08/06/chaos-venezuela-election-eu-maduro/](https://www.eunews.it/en/2024/08/06/chaos-venezuela-election-eu-maduro/)

[3] Verfassungsblog. (2024). Unprecedented Fraud and New Momentum. [https://verfassungsblog.de/elections-venezuela-2024/](https://verfassungsblog.de/elections-venezuela-2024/)

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.