The parliamentarian explained why the opposition saved its vote in the session.
Zaida Vahlis, deputy of the Legislative Council of Bolívar state (Cleb) announced the reasons why the memory and account of former Governor Justo Noguera Pietri was rejected.
In statements to scoop He mentioned that the act was rejected by the Cleb, following being presented by the Permanent Commission of Economy, Finance, Planning and Control, as provided in article 120 of the Constitution of the state of Bolívar and article 4 of the Cleb’s internal debate regulations. .
“The management report of former Governor Justo Noguera Pietri lacks arguments, given that he did not even carry out a financial audit of the income and expense accounts. Neither of the budget execution, nor of the accounting of the Bolívar state government », he pointed out.
He assured that “there was no administrative control over the contained resources.” He added that this report was rejected for a single point and it was: The authorization for the disincorporation and alienation of assets.
“711 vehicles and 263 motorcycles, on which there is a complaint filed, before the Attorney General of the Republic, for alleged punishable acts committed in the alienation to which mention has been made,” explained the Copei representative.
The parliamentarian highlighted that the management report had a date from January 1 to December 31, 2021 and includes a fiscal year of 2021, from December 2 to December 31, 2021, by Ángel Marcano.
“This period corresponds to a single fiscal and administrative period, since Ángel Marcano did not formally or legally correspond to assume the position, but on January 5, 2022, as established by the state constitution and the regulations,” he added.
He commented that the current governor, Ángel Marcano, is also “carrying the consequences and effects,” since he had to answer for the fiscal years and had to make objections and repairs within 120 working days, following having assumed the governorship.
Vahlis delimited that the lack of diligence of the person who chairs the commission “sinned by omission”, since he only proceeded to include as a basis of origin, the complaint argued and supported by the evidence consigned by a single opinion group.
On the other hand, he mentioned that the opposition that lives in parliament decided to save their vote, since they observed that no budgetary financial analysis was carried out on income and expenses.
“Nor was an extensive administrative evaluation made on the core of the alleged illicit acts committed with the resources contained in the forwarded budget not submitted for approval, in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of the state of Bolívar and the internal and debate regulations of the state. Bolívar, for which we demand that the investigation be opened by the Comptroller and Prosecutor of the Bolivarian Republic, “he said.
He reported that the investigation process should be expanded, to each of the formulated items «a financial and complete audit of the accounting of income and expenses should be carried out, since this would reveal the alleged punishable acts committed during his management. This audit would provide the evidence of such facts », he closed.
have the informationInstantly on your cell phone. Join the Diario Primicia group on WhatsApp through the following link:https://chat.whatsapp.com/Ek2ap8h1tvgDWxnz8BrYbO
We are also on Telegram as @DiarioPrimicia, join us here:https://t.me/diarioprimicia
