Why might someone choose not to transcribe an interview?
**Interviewer:** Welcome, Kim. Your recent article on interview transcripts has certainly sparked conversation. Many people are intrigued by the idea, but some are questioning its necessity. What would you say to those who find the whole process a bit overkill?
**Kim Blom:** I understand why some might see it that way. Transcribing an interview takes time and effort, and it might seem unnecessary if you’re confident in your memory or note-taking skills. But I truly believe that the benefits outweigh the perceived drawbacks.
Think about it – an interview transcript captures every nuance, every inflection, every detail that might be lost in rushed notes or fading memories. It provides an objective, accurate record of the conversation, which can be invaluable for various purposes, from writing compelling news articles to conducting in-depth research. Don’t you think having that level of precision and clarity is essential, especially in today’s information-driven world?
