2024-11-25 09:30:00
Democracy has been fully implemented in our country for more than 40 years. Democracy affects not only the functioning of institutions but also the coexistence between people. freedom of speechdifferences are respected, and as the old reporter said, this is a country where people can live with dignity and progress, even if it is ruled by our opponents.
Of course, our democracy is not perfect. Over the past forty years, we have experienced a series of changes, and we are in danger of returning to authoritarianism. A practice that has not completely disappeared. Situations where democratic institutions are under open attack, or where certain authoritarian practices are hidden under the guise of respect for those institutions. Yet our democracy still exists and works well.
Public opinion is respected, and although some groups still fall into the friend/enemy logic, the vast majority of society transcends politics, religion, cultural differences and lifestyles and lives peacefully. Significant progress has been made in Accept diversity.
Dictators don’t like this
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That’s why it bothers those who think they have the truth.
as always, When faced with a situation of change, especially when values and principles are threatened, some people resistThose who passively accept, those who agree, those who admire them and those who conversely think they are too cold or not follow through. They said the ball in the stands was small.
Intellectuals fight against cancel culture
They are also those who go further with a dogmatic attitude, often filled with fanaticism. They don’t acknowledge that there are people who disagree with some of the changes and make them public. Not only did they not accept it, they went to great lengths to silence the voices of anyone who disagreed with their ideas. Defenders of political correctness who consider themselves morally superior.
This attitude also has some manifestations in our country on issues such as legalization. abortionhe Equal marriage and non-binary lawvery similar to the so-called movement internationally woke up In idiomatic parlance, it can be translated as “awake,” but in political terms it means “to remain alert.” What to be wary of? Confront any actions, gestures or demonstrations that might be interpreted as disagreement, opposition, rejection or questioning of the flag of your struggle.
Although the Oxford Dictionary added the meaning of “awareness of social and political issues such as racism” to the term in 1917, one of its meanings came into widespread use in the United States in the 1990s. The country was one of those that fought against apartheid. Over time, it was incorporated into the fight against discrimination of any kind, especially on issues of gender and sexual orientation. He became dogmatic and fanatical.
Awakening Catechism
It ceased to be culture associated with the integration of differences and became an expression associated with political and ideological movements. the most radical left. In Argentina, the practice we call “escrache” became its modus operandi, so much so that its proponents came to be viewed by their critics as “literary police,” where everything was reduced to what they said was the interpretation. It is the meaning or meaning expressed by others that gives rise to what is known as cancel culture. Not just self-censorship.
in practice try to install fear Everyone must be very careful about what they say and do, especially when it comes to journalists, influential people, officials, artists, academics, religious leaders, scientists, writers, and intellectuals of all kinds. There are even a few comedians who worry that humor is in danger.
Its effectiveness also extended to Europe, to the point where many believed it was out of control. There are even some businessmen who are afraid of them, and so-called woke capitalism has developed which not only avoids any fact that might cause complaints against them, but even tries to curry favor with workerism to avoid problems.
Many people have lost their jobs or university professorships, falling victim to cancel culture, as happened to Argentinian philosopher Leonardo Orlando at Sciences Po, the largest public school in the world, when two projects about to be developed were Canceled.
Many analysts believe that the victory of the conservative right in Europe, and especially in the United States under Trump who has publicly demonstrated against his agenda, culture and woke movements, is partly the result of the fatigue of the big parties. All remnants of traditional values.
Many people have lost their jobs or university professorships, falling victim to cancel culture, as happened to Argentinian philosopher Leonardo Orlando at Sciences Po in Paris, the largest public school in the world.
In the face of those who resist change and those who go to great lengths to impose it, we, as recipients of the legacy of Father Jorge Bergoglio (today Pope Francis), in the Third Principle of the Document on History and Change “Universalism through Difference” is found in “Universalism through Difference”, a proposal to overcome the dilemma presented.
First, if we start from differences, it is because we recognize the existence of differences; if we propose a universalism, it is because we affirm the existence of a higher authority, a universalism that makes us all equal despite these differences, But our situation is the same. As the Charter of Principles of the University of El Salvador is reread in the light of the teaching of Pope Francis:
“Differences are being enriched and must be overcome through integration rather than suppression. In the teaching style of Jesus, guiding principles must be presented to be believed rather than forced to be followed. This short paragraph contains the complete doctrine.
Javier Millay accuses the United Nations of “imposing an ideological agenda” and rejecting the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
On the one hand, it recognizes that differences are a rich factor in society as a whole, thus rejecting any temptation to eliminate them; on the other hand, it categorically affirms that no position should be imposed. In other words, it is not intended to eliminate differences, nor is it intended to impose them.
The Church’s position on abortion, equal marriage and homosexuality, on mercy and forgiveness – as John Paul II forgave his attackers just two days after he nearly lost his life – is what you do in this world the nature of existence. Our behavior is one thing, our condition as human beings is another.
Pope Francis: “The centrality of the poor in the Gospel cannot be eliminated, this is not communism”
“Let the sinless man cast the first stone.” Of course, many will remember what Pope Francis told a group of reporters on a flight back from Brazil to Rome: “If a man is gay, seeks God and has good intentions, who am I to judge him?” Or decide that priests can bless same-sex couples, civil unions and domestic partnerships as long as they are not confused with religious liturgy.
While many people wonder if these words do not mean a change in the Church’s position on these issues, and may be interested in this situation, they do not understand what the Christian message actually is. For the Church, we are all children of God, sinners or not, and if Christ died on the cross, it was precisely to redeem us all from our sins, and the Pope is nothing but faithful to this message Not done, but that doesn’t mean the church’s position on these issues has changed.
Pope Francis shows us the way with his ecumenism that cuts across divisions. This path is never easy in the face of those who do not accept that the Church is open to marginalized groups of all kinds and does not abandon its fundamental principles and values, and in the face of those who want to impose their own vision on others. Cancel anything that is inconsistent with their interpretation of life and reality.
*Master’s degree, School of Social Sciences, University of El Salvador
1732527809
#universalism #differences
In what ways can the idea of “Universalism through Difference” help bridge the divides in El Salvador’s current socio-political climate?
**Interview with Dr. Maria Torres, Sociologist and Expert on Social Integration**
**Host:** Good morning, Dr. Torres! Thank you for joining us today to discuss some of the pressing social issues in El Salvador and how they relate to the teachings of Pope Francis.
**Dr. Torres:** Good morning! It’s a pleasure to be here.
**Host:** Let’s dive right in. The teaching of Pope Francis emphasizes the importance of recognizing and integrating differences within society. How do you see this principle manifesting in the current socio-political landscape of El Salvador?
**Dr. Torres:** Pope Francis’s teaching is indeed crucial for fostering a more integrated society. In El Salvador, we have diverse groups with varying beliefs and values. His call for integration rather than suppression aligns perfectly with the need for dialog and understanding among different communities, especially in dealing with contentious issues like abortion and equal marriage rights.
**Host:** You mentioned the integration of differences. In your view, what are the biggest challenges that El Salvador faces regarding this integration?
**Dr. Torres:** One of the main challenges is the deeply rooted cultural beliefs that often clash with progressive ideals. There is also a significant fear of backlash for those who advocate for change, especially against movements that seem to threaten traditional values. This was highlighted recently with accusations against the United Nations for imposing an ideological agenda, which can stifle necessary discussions about human rights and equality.
**Host:** Fascinating point. You hinted at the political landscape and its complexities. How do you see the implications of “cancel culture” in the context of El Salvador?
**Dr. Torres:** Cancel culture presents a unique challenge. While advocating for social change and rights, some individuals may resort to extreme measures to silence dissenting opinions. This not only harms constructive dialog but also creates an environment where individuals fear expressing their views. We need to encourage a culture of respect and understanding, where different opinions can coexist without fear of reprisal.
**Host:** Shifting gears a bit, can you elaborate on the idea of “Universalism through Difference” that you mentioned earlier in reference to Pope Francis’s teachings?
**Dr. Torres:** Absolutely. This concept is about recognizing that while individuals may have differing values and backgrounds, there is an underlying universal value that connects us all as human beings. Pope Francis advocates for acknowledging these differences, but he also calls for a shared commitment to humanity and mutual respect. This framework could guide us toward reconciliatory dialog amidst our differences.
**Host:** As we conclude, what do you think is the path forward for El Salvador in light of these teachings?
**Dr. Torres:** The path forward requires a commitment to dialog and inclusivity. Embracing our differences rather than shying away from them is essential. This means creating platforms for discussion and prioritizing education that promotes understanding and respect for all. It’s a slow process, but one that is necessary for sustainable democracy and societal harmony.
**Host:** Thank you so much, Dr. Torres, for your insights today. It’s clear the teachings of Pope Francis offer a profound framework for moving forward in El Salvador.
**Dr. Torres:** Thank you! It was a pleasure to discuss these important topics.
