This suggestion responds to the government’s request to “improve the financial balance of the system” by proposing additional savings. The employers’ document suggests increasing the minimum number of hours worked by intermittent workers in the entertainment industry to be able to benefit from unemployment benefit from 507 hours over the last 12 months to 580 hours for artists and 610 hours for technicians.
As intermittent workers in the entertainment industry are, by the nature of their activity, more frequently unemployed than other employees, their sector benefits more from the allowances than it contributes and is regularly the subject of criticism due to its high cost for the worker. unemployment insurance.
Reduce compensation for cross-border workers
The employers’ project also proposes to introduce a coefficient to reduce compensation for cross-border workers, currently calculated in relation to their last remuneration abroad, generally significantly higher than what is practiced on the French labor market. .
Finally, the text calls for the establishment of a “working group” on the system, criticized by employers, of bonus-malus which modulates the employer contribution for unemployment insurance in certain branches to discourage the signing of short contracts .
Negotiations between social partners on unemployment insurance and employment of seniors, launched at the end of October, are due to conclude on November 14. And the new unemployment insurance agreement should replace the current rules for compensating the unemployed from January 1.
1730945497
#Unemployment #insurance #Medef #toughen #conditions #intermittent #workers #entertainment #industry
Maria Rossi daughter
**Interview with Maria Rossi, Labor Policy Expert**
**Editor:** Welcome, Maria! Thank you for joining us today. Recently, there have been discussions surrounding unemployment benefits for workers in the entertainment industry. Can you explain the proposed changes and their implications?
**Maria Rossi:** Absolutely! The government is trying to enhance the financial sustainability of the unemployment benefits system. The new proposal suggests raising the minimum number of hours intermittent workers in entertainment need to qualify for unemployment benefits—specifically, from 507 hours to 580 hours for artists and 610 hours for technicians over the past 12 months.
**Editor:** What is the reasoning behind this increase in hours?
**Maria Rossi:** The rationale is twofold. Firstly, it aims to reduce government spending on unemployment benefits, which is crucial for maintaining a balanced budget. Secondly, it encourages more consistent work patterns among intermittent workers, which might help them secure more hours and potentially stabilize their income.
**Editor:** That certainly sounds logical, but how do you think this will impact workers in the entertainment industry?
**Maria Rossi:** The impact could be significant. Many artists and technicians already face unpredictable work schedules, and raising the minimum hours could exclude some workers who don’t reach that threshold due to the nature of the industry. It could lead to financial hardship for those who rely on these benefits during lean periods.
**Editor:** So, there’s a balance that needs to be struck here. What alternative measures could the government consider?
**Maria Rossi:** One possible option would be to create a tiered benefits system that considers different types of workers in the entertainment sector. For example, part-time or intermittent workers could have a lower threshold depending on their roles or income levels. This way, we can support the many freelancers and gig workers without significantly increasing government expenditures.
**Editor:** That seems reasonable. As this discussion progresses, what should industry stakeholders keep in mind?
**Maria Rossi:** Collaboration is key. Industry associations, workers, and government need to engage in dialogue to ensure that any changes made support both economic efficiency and the livelihood of entertainment workers. It’s essential to create a system that is fair and sustainable for everyone involved.
**Editor:** Thank you, Maria, for your insightful analysis on this topic. It’s crucial to navigate these proposals carefully to protect those who contribute to our vibrant entertainment sector.
**Maria Rossi:** Thank you for having me! It’s an important conversation, and I hope we see constructive developments soon.
