With the support of 124 countries including Pakistan United Nations The General Assembly on Wednesday passed a resolution in which Israel It has been demanded that he Gaza and end its ‘illegal presence’ in the occupied West Bank within one year.
As a result of non-compliance with this resolution, sanctions have also been demanded on Israel.
According to the Associated Press news agency, 124 countries in the 193-member international organization voted in favor of the resolution, while 14 opposed it and 43 countries did not participate in the voting process. Israel’s closest ally, the United States, was among those who opposed the resolution.
The resolution comes at a time when the Israeli offensive in Gaza is about to complete a year and violence in the West Bank is on the rise.
Efforts to reach a cease-fire agreement in Gaza continue, and US Secretary of State Anthony Blanken met with fellow negotiators in Egypt on Wednesday. On the other hand, attacks in other parts of the region have raised fears of an increase in conflicts in the Middle East.
Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian ambassador to the United Nations, has described this resolution as ‘a turning point in our struggle for freedom and justice’.
He said that this sends a clear message that ‘Israel’s occupation must end as soon as possible and the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination must be realized.’
On the other hand, Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, called the referendum “a shameful decision that supports the diplomatic terrorism of the Palestinian Authority.”
This section contains related reference points (Related Nodes field).
Danny Denon added that ‘on the one-year anniversary of the October 7, 2023 massacre, the General Assembly is dancing to the Palestinian Authority’s cues instead of condemning Hamas and demanding the release of the remaining 101 prisoners. The Palestinian Authority supports the killers of Hamas.’
The US mission to the UN described the resolution as ‘one-sided’ and pointed to its failure to recognize that Hamas, a ‘terrorist organisation’, still holds power in Gaza and that That Israel has the right to defend itself against terrorist attacks.
The US said that this resolution will not bring much improvement for the Palestinians. Indeed, it could complicate efforts to end the conflict in Gaza and hinder re-energized steps towards a two-state solution, ignoring Israel’s real security concerns.’
Although the resolution is not legally binding, its strong support reflects global opinion. Unlike the 15-member Security Council, the General Assembly does not exercise a veto.
The resolution also called for the withdrawal of all Israeli forces and settlers from the Occupied Palestinian Territories “without delay” and urged countries to impose sanctions on those who allow Israel’s presence in the territories. are responsible for maintaining and, if use is suspected, stop arms exports to Israel.
An elderly Palestinian woman sits worriedly after an Israeli attack on a school in Nusrit on September 11, 2024 (AFP/Iyad Baba)
In addition, the resolution called on Israel to compensate the Palestinians for damages caused by its occupation and urged countries to stop trade or investment that maintains Israel’s presence in the territories. Take action.
The move to pass the resolution comes in response to a ruling by the International Court of Justice in July, which said Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories is illegal and must end.
A court opinion is also not legally binding. The International Court of Justice strongly condemned Israel’s rule over the lands captured during the 1967 war, saying that Israel has no right to sovereignty over these territories and that it violates international laws against acquiring land by force. Violating.
Consideration of the resolution began in the UN General Assembly on Tuesday, with Palestinian Ambassador Riyad Mansour stressing that any country that believes the Palestinian people will ‘accept a life of slavery’ or that claims That Israel and Palestine Without a just solution to the conflict, peace is possible, he is ‘not being realistic.’
He said the solution is an independent Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, with peace and security neighboring Israel.
Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have also urged Israel to heed the demand for an end to its occupation.
The resolution called on UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to submit a report to the General Assembly within three months on the implementation of the resolution, which would include “the actions of Israel, other states and international organizations, including the United Nations.” Join in.’
Smoke is seen rising from an Israeli bombardment of Gaza on August 29, 2024 (AFP)
Antonio Guterres told reporters that we are fully committed to the decisions of the International Court of Justice. I will implement any decision of the General Assembly in this regard.
Palestinian Ambassador Riyad Mansour said that it is most likely that Israel will not pay attention to this resolution and that the Palestinians will bring another stronger resolution after that.
According to the French news agency (AFP), the Palestinian delegation at the United Nations has described this resolution as “historic”.
The most recent conflict between Hamas and Israel began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas infiltrated Israel and killed 1,205 people, according to official Israeli figures.
251 people were taken prisoner to Gaza that day, 97 of whom are still held inside the Gaza Strip, 33 of whom the Israeli military says have been killed.
After that Israeli aggression on Gaza As a result, according to the data provided by the Ministry of Health, more than 41 thousand 272 Palestinians have been killed so far, in which the majority are civilians, women and children.
The United Nations has recognized Gaza’s Ministry of Health as reliable.
According to the Israeli army, 348 of its soldiers have been killed since the ground attack on Gaza began on October 27.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘2494823637234887’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
#Israel #occupation #Gaza #resolution
2024-09-19 17:06:11
– What are the implications of the UN General Assembly’s resolution demanding Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza and the West Bank?
Table of Contents
United Nations Passes Historic Resolution Demanding Israel’s Withdrawal from Gaza and West Bank
In a landmark decision, the United Nations General Assembly has passed a resolution demanding that Israel end its “illegal presence” in the occupied West Bank and Gaza within one year. The resolution, supported by 124 countries, including Pakistan, marks a significant turning point in the long-standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The resolution, passed on Wednesday, also calls for sanctions to be imposed on Israel if it fails to comply with the demand. The vote was held during an emergency session of the General Assembly, with 14 countries opposing the resolution and 43 countries abstaining. The United States, Israel’s closest ally, was among those who opposed the resolution.
International Pressure Mounts on Israel
The resolution comes at a critical juncture, with the Israeli offensive in Gaza nearing its one-year mark and violence in the West Bank on the rise. The international community has been increasingly vocal in its criticism of Israel’s actions, with many countries calling for an end to the occupation and a two-state solution.
Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian ambassador to the United Nations, hailed the resolution as a “turning point” in the struggle for freedom and justice. “This sends a clear message that Israel’s occupation must end as soon as possible and the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination must be realized,” he said.
Israel Rejects Resolution
Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, denounced the resolution as “shameful” and accused the Palestinian Authority of supporting “diplomatic terrorism.” He also criticized the General Assembly for failing to condemn Hamas, a terrorist organization that holds power in Gaza.
The United States mission to the UN also rejected the resolution, describing it as “one-sided” and failing to recognize Israel’s right to defend itself against terrorist attacks. The US claimed that the resolution would not improve the situation for Palestinians and could even complicate efforts to end the conflict in Gaza.
Global Consensus on Israeli Occupation
Despite the opposition from Israel and the United States, the resolution’s strong support reflects a growing global consensus on the need to end the Israeli occupation. The General Assembly’s vote sends a clear message to Israel that its actions are no longer acceptable to the international community.
The resolution is not legally binding, but it carries significant moral weight and reflects the opinions of the majority of UN member states. Unlike the UN Security Council, the General Assembly does not have a veto power, allowing for a more representative vote.
Calls for Sanctions and Withdrawal
The resolution calls for the withdrawal of all Israeli forces and settlers from the Occupied Palestinian Territories “without delay.” It also urges countries to impose sanctions on those responsible for maintaining Israel’s presence in the territories and to stop arms exports to Israel.
The international community is increasingly fed up with Israel’s continued disregard for international law and its refusal to engage in meaningful peace talks. The passage of this resolution marks a significant shift in the global balance of power, with the majority of countries now calling for an end to the occupation and a just solution to the conflict.
A New Chapter in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
The UN General Assembly’s resolution marks a new chapter in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, one that prioritizes international law and the rights of the Palestinian people. As the world watches, it remains to be seen how Israel will respond to this historic demand for withdrawal and sanctions. One thing is certain, however – the status quo is no longer sustainable, and a new era of accountability has begun.
What are the implications of the UN General Assembly’s resolution demanding Israel to end its occupation of Palestinian territories?
Here is a comprehensive and SEO-optimized article on the topic:
UN General Assembly Passes Resolution Demanding Israel to End Illegal Occupation of Palestinian Territories
In a historic move, the United Nations General Assembly has passed a resolution, supported by 124 countries including Pakistan, demanding that Israel end its “illegal presence” in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip within one year. The resolution, which was opposed by 14 countries, including the United States, also calls for sanctions to be imposed on Israel if it fails to comply.
The resolution, which was passed on Wednesday, comes at a critical time when the Israeli offensive in Gaza is about to complete a year and violence in the West Bank is on the rise. The UN vote is a significant step towards acknowledging the illegality of Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories and highlights the growing global consensus on the need for a two-state solution.
Global Support for Palestinian Right to Self-Determination
The Palestinian ambassador to the United Nations, Riyad Mansour, hailed the resolution as a “turning point in our struggle for freedom and justice.” He emphasized that the resolution sends a clear message that Israel’s occupation must end as soon as possible and the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination must be realized.
Israeli Opposition and US Criticism
Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, denounced the resolution as a “shameful decision that supports the diplomatic terrorism of the Palestinian
:quality(70)/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/liberation/QD5H3ZYBV5CKZFUAUJQDCI3XQY.jpg "Ugo Humbert swept away by Alexander Zverev for his first Masters 1000 final – Libération")