2024-11-23 16:53:00
Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
The UN’s COP29 climate summit was on the brink of collapse on Saturday after negotiators representing 80 small island states and other vulnerable nations walked out of talks.
The alliances of small island nations and least-developed countries left the negotiations on how to finance the transition to a low-carbon economy and pay for the effects of climate change after receiving an updated proposal of $300bn from wealthy nations, up $50bn from the initial offer.
The G77 group of developing nations had called for at least $500bn.
“We’ve not been offered a deal, we’ve been offered an insult,” said a member of Barbados’s delegation.
In the stadium where the summit is taking place, protesters chanted “No deal is better than a bad deal” and urged the G77 to walk away.
The small island states group of about 40 nations held out the possibility of talks starting again. Cedric Schuster, its chair, said it remained “committed to this process”.
“We want nothing more than to continue to engage, but the process must be inclusive,” he said.
The talks were in “a crisis” and the walkout was a “massive expression of lack of trust in the presidency process”, said Alden Meyer, senior associate at think-tank E3G.
The finance talks are just one of several strands of discussion taking place at the event in Baku, where almost 200 countries are debating.
The walkout came after Germany accused Azerbaijan, the talks’ host, of backing attempts by fossil fuel producing countries to hijack the summit, which has already overrun by more than a day as efforts to seek consensus floundered.
Annalena Baerbock, Germany’s foreign affairs minister, warned that a “few fossil fuel states” were attempting a “geopolitical power play”.
Baerbock said oil and gas producing nations were playing a game on the “backs of the poorest and most vulnerable countries”.
“We will not allow the most vulnerable to be ripped off by the few fossil fuel producing countries, who at this moment have the backing of the COP29 presidency,” she said.
Several people involved in the talks told the Financial Times that countries led by Saudi Arabia and Russia were attempting to block any references to advancing last year’s agreement to transition away from fossil fuels.
“It is clear who is pulling the strings of the COP29 presidency,” said one senior negotiator.
Azerbaijan relies on fossil fuel income to support its economy. Its President Ilham Aliyev praised the country’s “God-given” oil and gas in speeches during the opening days of COP29.
There was also criticism of the EU’s negotiating tactics. Juan Carlos Monterrey Gomèz, Panama’s head of delegation, said the EU was playing “game[s]” by ensuring the negotiations over climate finance dragged on.
“This is what they always do,” he said. “They break us at the last minute . . . they push [it] and push it and push it until the negotiators leave, until we’re tired, until we’re delusional from not eating, from not sleeping.”
“We’re doing our utmost to build bridges with literally everyone,” said EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra. “It is not easy, neither on finance nor on mitigation.”
The COP29 presidency team, led by Azerbaijan’s ecology and natural resources minister Mukhtar Babayev, declined to comment. Saudi Arabia did not respond to a request for comment. A person close to Russia’s delegation said they had no comment.
Climate Capital
Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here.
Are you curious about the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here
1732392031
#climate #summit #brink #collapse #vulnerable #nations #walk
What were the main reasons behind the walkout of negotiators from small island states at the COP29 climate summit?
**Interview on COP29 Climate Summit Developments**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today. We’re witnessing some significant developments at the COP29 climate summit in Baku. To discuss these unfolding events, we have with us Alden Meyer, a senior associate at the think-tank E3G. Alden, can you provide us with an overview of the current situation at the summit?
**Alden Meyer:** Absolutely. The summit is currently in a precarious situation. On Saturday, negotiators from 80 small island states and other vulnerable nations walked out of the discussions, largely over disagreements about climate financing. While wealthy nations upped their initial offer to $300 billion, this falls drastically short of the $500 billion the G77 group had demanded. Many feel that what was offered was an insult rather than a serious deal.
**Interviewer:** That sounds intense. What do you think prompted the walkout from these nations?
**Alden Meyer:** The walkout was a clear expression of distrust in the negotiation process and the presidency of COP29. Delegates from these vulnerable nations felt they were not being treated with the seriousness they deserve, especially given the existential threats they face from climate change. It reflects not just a financial disparity, but a deeper frustration with how the negotiations have been structured.
**Interviewer:** Germany has also been vocal about its concerns regarding the negotiations. What’s their position on the negotiations?
**Alden Meyer:** Yes, Germany has accused Azerbaijan, the host country, of favoring fossil fuel producers and facilitating a “geopolitical power play” by oil and gas nations. Germany’s foreign affairs minister, Annalena Baerbock, emphasized the urgent need for a fair deal that does not exploit the most vulnerable countries for the benefit of a few fossil fuel states. It’s a critical point, as these dynamics often undermine comprehensive climate action.
**Interviewer:** There seems to be considerable frustration directed at the EU’s negotiating tactics as well. Could you elaborate on that?
**Alden Meyer:** Certainly. Leaders like Juan Carlos Monterrey Gomèz from Panama have criticized the EU for prolonging negotiations as a tactic, hoping to exhaust other delegates. This has created an environment of fatigue and frustration that could ultimately hinder progress. The integrity and inclusiveness of the process are at stake here, and there needs to be a concerted effort to rebuild trust among the parties involved.
**Interviewer:** Looking forward, do you think there’s hope for a resolution?
**Alden Meyer:** There is potential for talks to resume if the parties can find common ground, but it will require a sincere commitment to inclusivity and transparency. The stakes are high, and the world is watching. The chair of the small island states group, Cedric Schuster, indicated that they are still willing to engage, which offers a glimmer of hope. Rebuilding trust will be crucial if we want to see tangible outcomes from this summit.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Alden, for your insights on this critical situation. We’ll be keeping a close eye on the developments as they unfold.
**Alden Meyer:** Thank you for having me. It’s essential that we spotlight these issues during such pivotal discussions.
