UK Public Broadcasters: Take More Risks

‘Adolescence‘ Success Sparks Debate: Can British TV Reclaim risk-Taking?

The global success of “Adolescence,” a gripping drama exploring the dark corners of online misogyny and its tragic real-world consequences, has ignited a critical conversation within the UK’s television industry. Industry leaders are questioning whether budget cuts and the rise of streaming giants are stifling the risk-taking that once defined British television.

Date: October 26, 2024

the “Adolescence” Phenomenon

“Adolescence,” a show that fearlessly tackles the influence of “incel” culture on a young man driven to commit a horrific act, has become a global sensation. As of late October 2024, the show reigns supreme in 74 countries, boasting an remarkable 96.7 million views on Netflix. Its unflinching portrayal of societal issues has resonated with audiences worldwide.

Writer Jack Thorne raised concerns about whether the BBC, grappling with financial constraints from license fee cuts and competition from streaming services, could have produced “Adolescence” in its current form.this has led to soul-searching within the industry about the future of British storytelling.

Note: For illustrative purposes only. Replace with actual “Adolescence” trailer when available.

Financial Pressures and Risk Aversion

Emily Feller, Chief Creative Officer of Warp Films, the Sheffield-based production company that executive produced “Adolescence,” argues that financial pressures on public service broadcasters (PSBs) – the BBC, ITV, Channel 4, and Channel 5 – have made them increasingly risk-averse. This hesitancy to back challenging or unconventional projects could stifle creativity and limit the scope of stories told on British television.

Feller expressed hope that the success of “Adolescence” might encourage broadcasters to rediscover their appetite for risk.“hopefully Adolescence is allowing people to feel the risk-taking again, because there is an issue with money right now,” she said. “I think that it’s hard, and people are risk-averse. Hopefully, people will just take a moment and think this story has sold well. And obviously it comes down to money.”

Her comments echo concerns raised by Elisabeth Murdoch, co-founder of Sister, who warned of a “perfect storm” that could lead to British stories disappearing from screens. The UK television industry, grappling with shifting sands, faces critical questions about its future.

The Importance of Authentic British stories

Mark Herbert,Warp Films’ Chief Executive,emphasized that “Adolescence” proves that authentically British stories can achieve international success. “A British story set in this country can travel and you don’t need loads of effects, you don’t need crazy budgets,” he said. “Certain shows need that, and they’ve got their place, but I hope this shows you can hit a massive global audience without any of those. Just great acting, great storytellers.”

Herbert championed the value of regional filming, emphasizing its positive impact on local economies and community confidence. This echoes the arguments frequently enough made in the U.S. about the benefits of film tax credits and incentives for productions to shoot outside of Hollywood, bolstering local economies and creating jobs in states like Georgia and Louisiana.

However, he called for government intervention to support the struggling UK television industry, which has faced post-COVID contraction, inflation, and financial pressures on domestic broadcasters.

A Call for Government Support

Herbert specifically called for a review of the UK’s tax credit system, arguing that current financial models are unsustainable. “I certainly think the whole tax credit thing needs looking at,” Herbert stated. “If you look at what kind of stuff we’ve made historically, it’s £2-3m an episode. The international market is really struggling at the moment. people are not coming up with the ways to top up that finance – the costs to make those shows can’t go down any more. So we are in this weird chicken and egg situation where we do need some help.”

The UK’s situation mirrors concerns about the economic viability of self-reliant film and television production in the U.S., where rising production costs and competition from streaming services are squeezing smaller players. The debate over tax incentives and government support for the arts is a constant one on both sides of the Atlantic.

The production timeline of “Adolescence” highlights the financial realities. As Feller noted, public broadcasters often operate on shorter shooting schedules (11-13 days per hour of television) compared to productions like “Adolescence” (15 days per hour). this difference in production time reflects a important cost difference and impacts the creative possibilities.

Warp Films’ Future Projects

Warp Films continues to champion unique British stories. Their upcoming revenge thriller, “Reunion,” set in Sheffield, features both British Sign Language and spoken English. They have also acquired the rights to develop “Threads,” the chilling 1984 film depicting Sheffield during a nuclear war.

Feller emphasized Warp films’ commitment to telling stories about ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances. “The way the original film was written and made, it absolutely had that voice with Sheffield,” she said. “That’s the kind of place, again, where you find that very rounded heart to the storytelling.”

The Bigger Picture: PSBs vs. Streaming

The discussion surrounding “Adolescence” underscores the ongoing tension between public service broadcasters and streaming services. While streaming platforms offer opportunities for wider audiences and greater creative freedom,they also operate under different financial models and priorities.

In the U.S., this debate manifests in discussions about net neutrality, the regulation of streaming services, and the funding of public broadcasting entities like PBS and NPR. Finding a balance that supports both commercial innovation and the creation of culturally significant content remains a key challenge.

Expert Analysis

Industry analysts suggest that the success of shows like “Adolescence” hinges on a combination of factors: a compelling narrative,strong performances,and a willingness to tackle sensitive social issues. However, financial backing and distribution are also crucial.

The real challenge for British TV is to maintain its unique voice and viewpoint in an increasingly globalized media landscape. This requires a commitment to funding original content and fostering a supportive environment for creative talent.

The future of british television depends on its ability to adapt to changing market conditions while staying true to its core values: quality, innovation, and public service.

The Future of British TV: A Table of Key Challenges and Opportunities

Challenge	Chance	Potential Solution
Budget Cuts to PSBs	Increased Collaboration with International Partners	Explore co-production agreements and shared funding models.
Competition from Global Streaming Services	Niche Programming Focusing on Unique British Stories	Invest in content that differentiates British television from global offerings.
Risk Aversion in commissioning	Pilot Programs and Incubator Schemes for Emerging Talent	Provide funding and support for new voices and unconventional ideas.
Talent Drain to Higher-Paying Streaming Jobs	Government tax Incentives and Production Subsidies	Make British TV more financially competitive for writers, actors, and crew.

What are the biggest challenges and opportunities facing British TV, and how can the industry navigate them?

interview: Emily Feller on “Adolescence” Success and the Future of British TV

Introduction

Archyde News Editor, Archys sat down with Emily Feller, Chief Creative Officer of Warp Films, the production company behind the hit series “Adolescence,” to discuss the show’s phenomenal global success and its implications for the UK television industry.The interview delves into the challenges faced by British television,the importance of risk-taking,and the potential solutions for the future.

The “Adolescence” Phenomenon and its Impact

Archyde: Emily, congratulations on the unbelievable success of “Adolescence.” What do you think has resonated so strongly with audiences worldwide, leading to such remarkable viewership numbers?

Emily Feller: thank you! We’re thrilled with the response. I believe it’s a combination of factors. Firstly, the story tackles a tough but relevant issue – the dark side of online culture. Secondly, the performances are outstanding. And, perhaps most importantly, the show doesn’t shy away from the complexities of the narrative. People appreciate authenticity, and “Adolescence” offers that.

Archyde: The show has ignited a conversation about risk-taking in British TV. Do you believe that the financial constraints faced by public service broadcasters have made them more risk-averse?

Emily Feller: Absolutely. The financial pressures are undeniable. Shorter production schedules compared to those we had when producing “Adolescence” which had 15 days per hour, can limit creative possibilities. This can lead to caution when commissioning new projects. “Adolescence” proves that taking a chance on a challenging subject, like online misogyny, can pay off, but not all broadcasters have the freedom—or the appetite—to do so.

Financing, Risk and Authentic british stories

Archyde: Mark Herbert from Warp Films emphasized the importance of authentically british stories. Do you agree that these stories can compete on a global scale without enormous budgets and reliance on special effects?

Emily Feller: Yes, completely! “Adolescence” is proof of that. We didn’t need massive budgets or visual spectacle.We focused on great storytelling, solid acting, and a strong connection with our location – Sheffield. British stories, rooted in their communities, can be incredibly powerful and resonate globally. It allows for a connection on a human level that transcends language barriers.

Archyde: The industry is also facing increased competition from streaming services. How can British TV compete with the budgets and reach of these global platforms?

Emily Feller: It requires a multi-pronged approach.Collaboration is key, including coproduction agreements or shared funding models for big projects. Also,psbs need to embrace niche programming and invest in stories that are uniquely British. We have to distinguish ourselves to cut through all the content available.

Government Support and Future Projects

Archyde: what role do you see for the government concerning the tax credit system and support for the TV industry?

Emily Feller: The government needs to review the tax credit system. It needs to be competitive enough to retain talent and attract funding. We need to create a situation where UK productions can thrive financially. It’s critical to nurture a healthy environment and not be at a disadvantage.

Archyde: Warp Films has exciting projects on the horizon, including “Reunion” and a new development of “Threads.” How do these projects reflect Warp Film’s commitment to telling unique british stories, as you have described?

Emily Feller: “Reunion” uniquely includes both spoken English and British Sign Language. It really exemplifies our dedication to showcasing diverse voices and perspectives. “Threads,” the chilling 1984 film focusing on Sheffield, presents stories about ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances.We are committed to stories close to home, with a truly rounded heart of storytelling.

Challenges and Opportunities

Archyde: Looking ahead, what are the biggest challenges and opportunities facing British TV, and how can the industry navigate them?

Emily feller: The challenges include budget cuts to broadcasters, talent drain and heightened competition from streaming platforms. This can all be remedied with increased collaboration with international partners, investing in niche content, and tax incentives. Pilot programs are vital to support emerging talent.

Archyde: In your view, what is the single most important step that British TV can take to secure its future?

Emily Feller: It must stay true to its roots. That authenticity. The focus on great storytelling, a willingness to take creative risks, and commitment to public service values. that is essential. We must also nurture our talent pool, from writers and actors to crew members. This must be done to remain competitive and to keep telling the stories that make British TV so distinctive.

archyde: Thank you, Emily, for your insights. It’s been engaging to hear your outlook.

Emily Feller: Thank you for having me.

reader Interaction

Archyde: What do you think is the biggest threat to British storytelling, and how can the industry overcome it? Share your thoughts in the comments below! We want to hear from you.