The U.S. has approved a substantial $20 billion arms sale to Israel, which includes a significant number of fighter jets and advanced air-to-air missiles. This announcement, made by the State Department, comes just two days before scheduled cease-fire talks are set to begin in the region.
Congress has been notified of the impending sale, which has been anticipated since April. This sale occurs amid heightened concerns that Israel may become embroiled in a broader Middle East conflict. The arms package includes up to 50 F-15 fighter jets, up to 30 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles, tactical vehicles, and a substantial number of tank and high explosive mortar cartridges.
However, the delivery of these weapons is not expected to occur immediately. The delivery timeline ranges from 2026 to 2029, which means that Israel may not receive these arms for several years. Earlier in the year, several lawmakers, including Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, expressed intentions to object to the sale.
The items in the sale are designed to enhance and sustain Israel’s long-term defensive capabilities. A State Department official has indicated that the F-15s, which are to be manufactured by Boeing, will take at least a decade to be fully delivered.
Rockets fired from southern Lebanon are intercepted by Israel’s Iron Dome air defense system over the Upper Galilee region in northern Israel on August 9, 2024.
JALAA MAREY/AFP via Getty Images
The State Department has reiterated the U.S. commitment to Israel’s security, emphasizing that it is vital to U.S. national interests to assist Israel in developing and maintaining a robust self-defense capability. This arms sale is in line with these objectives.
The Biden administration is currently navigating a complex political landscape, balancing ongoing support for Israel with increasing calls from lawmakers and the U.S. public to limit military assistance, particularly in light of the high number of civilian casualties in Gaza. The administration has already curtailed the delivery of 2,000-pound weapons amid ongoing airstrikes in densely populated civilian areas.
The arms contracts not only cover the sale of the new 50 aircraft to be produced by Boeing but also include upgrade kits for Israel to enhance its existing fleet of two dozen F-15 fighter jets with new engines and advanced radar systems. The jets represent over $18 billion of the total $20 billion in sales.
The announcement of the weapons sale comes just before cease-fire talks set for Thursday, which are being coordinated by the U.S., Egypt, and Qatar. A Hamas representative has indicated that while Hamas will not attend the talks, they will continue to negotiate, citing a lack of assurances from Israel to engage with Hamas’s July 2 proposal.
In a statement, Hamas’s representative in Lebanon, Ahmad Abdul Hadi, expressed the group’s commitment to reaching an agreement, emphasizing the need to address the ongoing violence and humanitarian crisis affecting their people.
Members of the Palestinian Joint Action Committee hold a rally and a symbolic funeral for late Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Beirut, Lebanon, on August 2, 2024.
Fadel Itani/NurPhoto via Getty Images
In the backdrop of these developments, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has reiterated claims that the U.S. has been delaying weapons deliveries for Israel’s military efforts in Gaza, a statement that the Biden administration has denied. In a Cabinet meeting, Netanyahu mentioned a “dramatic drop” in U.S. weapons deliveries, a claim that has not been substantiated with specific details.
As the region grapples with these complex dynamics, the implications of the U.S. arms sale to Israel are significant. The long-term delivery timeline suggests that while the U.S. is committed to Israel’s defense, the immediate military landscape may not change rapidly. This arms sale, set against the backdrop of ongoing conflict and humanitarian concerns, may also influence public opinion and political discourse in the U.S. and beyond.
In the coming years, it will be crucial for policymakers to address the balance between military support and humanitarian considerations, particularly in light of the increasing calls for accountability and restraint in military actions. The evolving geopolitical landscape, particularly with the potential for broader conflict in the Middle East, will also require careful navigation to ensure that U.S. interests and commitments are aligned with the realities on the ground.