Two massive drops in the Earth’s mantle baffle scientists with their amazing properties

The earth is layered like an onion, with a thin outer crust, a thick slimy mantle, a liquid outer core, and a solid inner core. In the mantle, there are two massive teardrop-shaped structures, roughly on either side of the planet. The drops, officially called Large Low Shear Provinces (LLSVPs), are each about the size of a continent and 100 times higher than Mount Everest. One is located under the African continent, the other under the Pacific Ocean.

Using instruments that measure seismic waves, scientists know that these two blobs have complex shapes and structures, but despite their important properties, little is known about why the blobs exist or what led to their strange shapes.

Arizona State University scientists Qian Yuan and Minming Li from the College of Earth and Space Exploration set out to discover more about these two droplets using geodynamic modeling and analyzes of published seismic surveys. Through their research, they were able to determine the extreme heights that the droplets have reached and how the size and density of the droplets, as well as the surrounding viscosity in the mantle, can control their height. Their research was recently published in Nature Geoscience is a monthly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Nature Publishing Group covering all aspects of the Earth sciences, including theoretical research, modeling, and fieldwork. Other related work has also been published in fields including atmospheric sciences, geology, geophysics, climatology, oceanography, palaeontology, and space science. It was established in January 2008.

“data-gt-translate-attributes =”[{”attribute=””>NatureGeoscience[{”attribute=””>NatureGeoscience.

The results of their seismic analysis led to a surprising discovery that the blob under the African continent is about 621 miles (1,000 km) higher than the blob under the Pacific Ocean. According to Yuan and Li, the best explanation for the vast height difference between the two is that the blob under the African continent is less dense (and therefore less stable) than the one under the Pacific Ocean.

To conduct their research, Yuan and Li designed and ran hundreds of mantle convection models simulations. They exhaustively tested the effects of key factors that may affect the height of the blobs, including the volume of the blobs and the contrasts of density and viscosity of the blobs compared with their surroundings. They found that to explain the large differences of height between the two blobs, the one under the African continent must be of a lower density than that of the blob under the Pacific Ocean, indicating that the two may have different composition and evolution.

“Our calculations found that the initial volume of the blobs does not affect their height,” lead author Yuan said. “The height of the blobs is mostly controlled by how dense they are and the viscosity of the surrounding mantle.”

“The Africa LLVP may have been rising in recent geological time,” co-author Li added. “This may explain the elevating surface topography and intense volcanism in eastern Africa.”

These findings may fundamentally change the way scientists think about the deep mantle processes and how they can affect the surface of the Earth. The unstable nature of the blob under the African continent, for example, may be related to continental changes in topography, gravity, surface volcanism and plate motion.

“Our combination of the analysis of seismic results and the geodynamic modeling provides new insights on the nature of the Earth’s largest structures in the deep interior and their interaction with the surrounding mantle,” Yuan said. “This work has far-reaching implications for scientists trying to understand the present-day status and the evolution of the deep mantle structure, and the nature of mantle convection.”

Reference: “Instability of the African large low-shear-wave-velocity province due to its low intrinsic density” by Qian Yuan and Mingming Li, 10 March 2022, Nature Geoscience.
DOI: 10.1038 / s41561-022-00908-3

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.