AS MANY AS 12 labor unions/labor unions under the coordination of the Confederation of All Indonesian Trade Unions (KSPSI) have filed a constitutional test of Law Number 4 of 2016 concerning Public Housing Savings (UU Tapera) to the Constitutional Court (MK). The constitutional test lawsuit was submitted by the leaders of the 12 labor unions/labor unions, led by KSPSI Chairman Jumhur Hidayat and accompanied by attorney Denny Indrayana on Wednesday (18/9).
A number of labor union leaders claimed that they were conducting a constitutional test because they were tired of the many levies imposed by the government on workers.
“There are so many levies that workers have to bear with wages that are part of the minimum wage, starting from Income Tax (PPh), BPJS, why is there also Tapera,” said the General Chairperson of SBSI 1992, Sunarti, in her statement, Wednesday (18/9).
Meanwhile, KSPSI General Chairman Jumhur Hidayat questioned the government’s attitude in providing many sources of state wealth such as mines worth trillions to large capital owners or oligarchs. While the people are burdened with levies.
Also read: Workers Ask MK to Cancel Omnibus Law or Threaten to Strike
According to Jumhur, the government should be obliged to provide people’s houses, not the people who are required to provide savings to build houses. “Hopefully Prof. Denny wins this constitutional test,” he hoped.
Previously, Denny stated that this constitutional test was filed because there were obligations that burdened the community, especially workers/laborers who already had many deductions, which would be added to Tapera deductions. Therefore, Tapera contributions were considered unfair and contradictory to the principle of state obligations which should actually have the obligation to provide housing for the people, not to collect from the people.
“We are submitting a constitutional test of the Tapera Law to the Constitutional Court, especially regarding Article 7, there is a mandatory phrase whose constitutionality has been requested to the Constitutional Court,” explained Denny.
Also read: Coalition of Labor Unions Asks Constitutional Court to be Consistent on Unconstitutional Omnibus Law on Job Creation
Currently, Deny continued, the registration process is ongoing. He questioned the paradigm of how the state handles public matters now is very sad.
“On the one hand, the lower classes, the people and workers have many obligations that must be given to the state, on the other hand, the state provides many reliefs or incentives to oligarchs whose tax payments are problematic,” explained Denny.
Meanwhile, the 12 labor unions/worker unions that filed a constitutional test of Law No. 4 of 2016 include KSPSI, GSBI, SBSI 1992. FKSPN, FSPPEK, APEK, PPMI, FSPPP, and KBMI. (Van/M-4)
#Trade #Unions #File #Constitutional #Review #Tapera #Law
What are the main arguments against the Tapera Law as presented by the trade unions in Indonesia?
Table of Contents
Here is a comprehensive and SEO-optimized article based on the provided content:
Title: 12 Trade Unions File Constitutional Review of Tapera Law, Citing Unfair Burden on Workers
Meta Description: The Confederation of All Indonesian Trade Unions (KSPSI) has filed a constitutional review of the Tapera Law, arguing that it unfairly burdens workers with excessive levies. Read more about the lawsuit and its implications.
Keywords: Tapera Law, Constitutional Review, Labor Unions, Workers’ Rights, Indonesia
Article:
In a landmark move, 12 labor unions under the coordination of the Confederation of All Indonesian Trade Unions (KSPSI) have filed a constitutional review of the Tapera Law (Law Number 4 of 2016) concerning Public Housing Savings to the Constitutional Court (MK). The lawsuit, submitted by the leaders of the 12 labor unions, led by KSPSI Chairman Jumhur Hidayat and accompanied by attorney Denny Indrayana, aims to challenge the levies imposed by the government on workers.
Unfair Burden on Workers
The labor unions claim that they are conducting the constitutional review because they are tired of the many levies imposed by the government on workers. “There are so many levies that workers have to bear with wages that are part of the minimum wage, starting from Income Tax (PPh), BPJS, why is there also Tapera,” said Sunarti, General Chairperson of SBSI 1992. These levies, they argue, unfairly burden workers who are already struggling to make ends meet.
Government’s Attitude Questioned
KSPSI General Chairman Jumhur Hidayat has also questioned the government’s attitude in providing many sources of state wealth such as mines worth trillions to large capital owners or oligarchs, while burdening the people with levies. “The government should be obliged to provide people’s houses, not the people who are required to provide savings to build houses,” he said.
Constitutional Review of Tapera Law
The Tapera Law, which requires workers to contribute to a public housing savings scheme, has been deemed unfair and contradictory to the principle of state obligations. The law, the labor unions argue, should provide housing for the people, not collect from them. Attorney Denny Indrayana, who is representing the labor unions, explained that the constitutional review was filed because there were obligations that burdened the community, especially workers who already had many deductions.
Implications of the Lawsuit
The lawsuit has significant implications for workers’ rights in Indonesia. If the Constitutional Court rules in favor of the labor unions, it could lead to a revision of the Tapera Law and a reduction in the burden on workers. The lawsuit also highlights the need for the government to rethink its approach to providing public services and ensuring the welfare of its citizens.
Related News:
Workers Ask MK to Cancel Omnibus Law or Threaten to Strike
Coalition of Labor Unions Asks Constitutional Court to be Consistent on Unconstitutional Omnibus Law on Job Creation
By filing this constitutional review, the labor unions are taking a critical step towards protecting the rights of workers and promoting a more equitable society in Indonesia.
What are the main arguments presented by the labor unions against the Tapera Law in their constitutional review?
12 Labor Unions File Constitutional Review of Tapera Law, Citing Unfair Burden on Workers
In a significant move, 12 labor unions under the coordination of the Confederation of All Indonesian Trade Unions (KSPSI) have submitted a constitutional review of Law Number 4 of 2016 concerning Public Housing Savings (UU Tapera) to the Constitutional Court. The lawsuit was filed on Wednesday, September 18, led by KSPSI Chairman Jumhur Hidayat and accompanied by attorney Denny Indrayana.
Unfair Burden on Workers
The labor unions are unhappy with the numerous levies imposed by the government on workers, which they claim are burdensome and unfair. “There are so many levies that workers have to bear with wages that are part of the minimum wage, starting from Income Tax (PPh), BPJS, why is there also Tapera,” said Sunarti, General Chairperson of SBSI 1992.
KSPSI General Chairman Jumhur Hidayat questioned the government’s attitude in providing many sources of state wealth, such as mines worth trillions, to large capital owners or oligarchs, while burdening the people with levies. “We hope that Prof. Denny wins this constitutional test,” he said.
Constitutional Review
According to attorney Denny Indrayana, the constitutional review was filed because the Tapera Law imposes an unfair burden on workers, who already have many deductions from their wages. He argued that the government should be obligated to provide housing for the people, not collect savings from them. “We are submitting a constitutional test of the Tapera Law to the Constitutional Court, especially regarding Article 7, there is a mandatory phrase whose constitutionality has been requested to the Constitutional Court,” explained Denny.
Registration Process Ongoing
Currently, the registration process is ongoing, with Denny Indrayana questioning the paradigm of how the state handles public matters. “On the one hand, the lower classes, the people and workers have many obligations that must be given to the state, on the other hand, the state provides many reliefs or incentives to oligarchs whose tax payments are problematic,” he said.
Participating Labor Unions
The 12 labor unions/worker unions that filed the constitutional review of Law No. 4 of 2016 include KSPSI, GSBI, SBSI 1992, and FKS.
Similar Moves
This is not the first time labor unions have taken action against the government’s policies. Previously, workers had asked the Constitutional Court to cancel the Omnibus Law, threatening to strike if their demands were not met. Additionally, a coalition of labor unions had asked the Constitutional Court to be consistent on the unconstitutional Omnibus Law on Job Creation.
Keyword Optimization:
Tapera Law
Constitutional Review
Labor Unions
Workers’ Rights
Unfair Burden
Government Policies
Constitutional Court
KSPSI
Jumhur Hidayat
Denny Indrayana
Note: The article has been optimized for SEO with relevant keywords, meta tags, and internal linking to improve search engine ranking and user experience.
