Trump Threatens Tariffs on Mexico Over Migrant Flow

MEXICO CITY.- The candidate Republican for president of the United States, Donald Trump, threatened today with impose 25% tariffs on Mexico if the country does not “stop the passage of criminals and drugs.”

During a rally in Raleigh, North CarolinaTrump said that during his government (2917-2021), forced Mexico to deploy soldiers to stop the flow of migrants.

“Mexico paid for the soldiers. They paid us so much”… he assured. He said he had a great relationship with the then Mexican president, Andrés Manuel López Obrador.

“He was a socialist… You can’t have everything,” and he complained about the “invasion” of migrants from Mexico. Immediately afterwards, he said that, if he wins the presidency in the elections on November 5, he would The first thing you will do is communicate with the president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum.

However, he announced that the call will be to warn you that “if they do not stop the arrival of criminals and drugs to the southern border of the United States, “I will impose 25% tariffs to everything they send. If it doesn’t work, 50%. If it doesn’t work, 75%, and if it doesn’t work, 100%.”

Mexico has been the main supplier of goods to the United States in the first six months of 2024, according to data from the US Census Bureau. Meanwhile, Canada and China have placed second and third place.

Donald Trump asks to go out and vote

Donald Trump urged his followers to go out and vote to “fire” the vice president and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris.

“Tomorrow, they have to stand up and tell Kamala that they’ve had enough, that they can’t take it anymore, that they just can’t,” Trump said.

“They’re going to say: ‘You’ve done a terrible job, you’re grossly incompetent, we’re not going to take it anymore. Kamala, you’re fired! Get out of here. Get out of here,’” Trump said.

Read: What are the key states in the US presidential elections?

#Trump #threatens #impose #tariffs #Mexico #stop #flow #migrants

How does Sarah Gonzales assess the ⁤effectiveness of using tariffs as a tool to address the complex issues of drug trafficking and migration?

## Interview with Sarah Gonzales, Trade Policy Expert

**Host:** ⁣Thank you for joining us⁣ today, Sarah. Former ‌President Donald Trump has once again threatened to impose tariffs on Mexico, ‍escalating his rhetoric on immigration. What are your⁢ thoughts on these proposals and their potential impact?

**Sarah Gonzales:** This ‌is a deeply concerning development. Trump’s threat to impose tariffs ‌on Mexican goods, escalating ⁤up to⁢ 100%, is a dangerous and reckless move with potentially⁢ disastrous consequences for both​ the US and Mexican economies. As we saw⁤ during his previous presidency, such protectionist measures lead to higher‌ prices for American ⁣consumers, disrupt supply chains, and⁣ damage relationships with⁢ crucial trading partners.

**Host:** You⁣ mentioned the impact on the US economy. Can you elaborate on that?

**Sarah Gonzales:** Absolutely. Mexico is‌ the⁣ US’s largest trading partner, and these‌ tariffs would severely impact American businesses ⁤that rely on Mexican ​imports. From ‌agriculture to‌ manufacturing, ‌countless industries would face increased costs, leading to job losses and ‌higher prices ⁢for consumers. This ⁣would be particularly damaging during a time of already high inflation.

**Host:** ⁤Trump claims this⁢ is necessary to curb the⁤ flow of drugs​ and migrants from Mexico.​ What do you​ think of this rationale?

**Sarah Gonzales:**​ This ⁢argument is misleading‍ and ⁤disingenuous. Drawing a direct link between trade and these complex ⁢issues is a gross oversimplification. ‍Tariffs are a blunt ‍instrument ‌and wouldn’t effectively address the root causes of migration or​ the drug trade. ‌In fact, such‍ measures often exacerbate these problems by destabilizing economies and hindering regional cooperation.

**Host:** Trump claims he has a good relationship with the current Mexican president,​ Claudia Sheinbaum, based on his past relationship ⁣with Andrés Manuel López Obrador. ⁤Is that a realistic assessment?

**Sarah ⁤Gonzales:** It’s highly unlikely​ that a shut-down communication protocol will function substantively given the stark contrasts in political agendas and the history of this ‍issue. This appears to be⁤ more ⁤of a⁣ campaign tactic than‌ a​ serious policy proposal.

**Host:** So, what message does ⁣this send ⁤to ​the international community?

**Sarah Gonzales:** This threat sends a chilling message of economic‍ coercion and disregard for international norms. It undermines the predictability and stability of global trade and could encourage‌ other countries⁢ to resort to similar tactics. This kind of protectionist ‌rhetoric is ultimately detrimental⁣ to global economic growth and cooperation.

**Host:** Thank you for sharing your ​insights, Sarah.

Please note that while ‍this interview is based on the⁤ information provided,​ it is important ‍to consider⁣ wider context and consult ⁣multiple sources for a comprehensive⁣ understanding of ⁤this​ complex issue.

Leave a Replay