Photo copyright: Reuters
Well, ladies and gentlemen, sit tight because we’re diving into the latest chapter of the international political soap opera: “As the Trump Turns”. Yes, it seems Donald Trump and his merry band of strategists are now setting their sights on Ukraine, but spoiler alert: it’s not exactly what you’d expect! In a recent BBC interview, Trump’s close aide, Brian Lanza, dropped some bombshells that could have even the most seasoned political analyst doing double-takes.
Now, Lanza, having had his fingers in the Trump campaign pies since 2016, decided to grace us with his take on Ukraine. He’s made it crystal clear that Trump’s new priority will be—in his own words—“ending the war,” not dredging up every last square inch of territory from the clutches of Russia, particularly Crimea, the place that keeps popping up like that one annoying relative at family reunions.
Now, if you’re wondering what Lanza means by ‘peace,’ let’s just say it’s not the hand-holding, flower-giving scenario one might hope for. He’s basically declared that if President Zelensky deems peace possible only with Crimea back in Ukraine’s pocket, then he might as well start looking for a new negotiation table — preferably one with pizza, because this one’s going nowhere!
In Lanza’s eyes, Crimea is like last season’s iPhone; it’s lost, and it ain’t coming back. “If your priority is to return Crimea,” he says, “then you’re already without us.” Talk about a wake-up call! He’s implying that for the U.S. to maintain any verve in their negotiations, they’ve got to loosen their grip on nostalgia—and who can blame them? If there’s one thing we’ve learned from politics, it’s that we shouldn’t hold on too tightly to what’s already slipped away.
But hang on! Before we start throwing confetti for Trump’s grand new plan for peaceful coexistence, we need to understand something crucial: Lanza himself isn’t exactly a spokesperson. That’s right! The Trump transition team was quick to clarify that while Lanza has been around during the campaigns, he’s not a part of the administration’s inner circle as it prepares to roll out its new policies. So, basically, we’re left with a game of “Simon Says” — where Trump is Simon, and everyone else better hope they’re not eliminated before the game ends!
Meanwhile, the Kremlin has chimed in, demanding that everyone get on board, essentially telling the West, “How about you just acknowledge our little land grab as the ‘new normal’?” It’s like telling your ex to just accept the fact that you’ve moved on to someone far better. Spoiler alert: It’s not happening!
And to further spice things up, an unnamed National Security Council official jumped in to remind the world that what Lanza said doesn’t represent Trump’s actual plans. Timing is everything, right? It seems there are layers upon layers in this political lasagna, and at this point, even the chefs are getting confused.
On the other side, Zelensky’s advisor, Dmitry Lytvyn, shot back, claiming that it’s Putin who’s drumming up more war and land grabs, not Ukraine. “We’ve been offering peace since 2022!” he huffs, as though he’s trying to convince a stubborn toddler to share their toys.
In a world where truth and transparency seem as rare as a unicorn sighting, we’re left scratching our heads and wondering: what’s next? “Honest conversation,” says Lanza. But my friends, if we couldn’t get that after centuries of strife, I’d say we’re in for a bumpy ride.
So buckle up, folks! Whether we’re off to peace talks or a geopolitical game of musical chairs, one thing’s for sure: it’s going to be one wild ride!
Stay tuned for more updates because this drama is far from over. And remember, politics might not be a laughing matter, but it sure does provide entertaining fodder! Keep your friends close, and your political analysts closer!
Photo copyright: Reuters
Photo caption: In a pivotal meeting prior to the elections in September, Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky engaged in discussions with Donald Trump at Trump Tower. Accompanying them was Andrei Ermak, head of Zelensky’s Office, along with J.D. Vance, who is now vice president-elect, and Richard Grenell, widely speculated to be appointed as national security adviser on November 9, 2024.
As the incoming Trump administration prepares for power, its primary focus on Ukraine will shift towards securing peace rather than pursuing the return of all territories taken by Russia, including the contentious region of Crimea, according to Brian Lanza, a close associate of the president-elect.
Brian Lanza, who played a significant role in both Trump’s 2016 and 2024 campaigns, articulated his insights about the future administration’s stance on the ongoing conflict during an interview with the BBC World Service’s Weekend program.
It is important to note that a spokesperson for the Trump transition administration clarified that Lanza is not an official member and does not speak on behalf of Trump.
Lanza emphasized that the main objective would be achieving “peace and an end to the killing,” rather than insisting on reclaiming every Ukrainian territory lost to Russian forces. He expressed skepticism regarding Zelensky’s commitment to peace, suggesting that if the president contemplates negotiations contingent upon recovering Crimea, it indicates a lack of seriousness. “Crimea is lost,” he firmly stated.
Lanza made a pointed remark to President Zelensky regarding the perception of the conflict, indicating that a focus on regaining Crimea could lead to alienation from American support. “If your priority is to return Crimea, and for American soldiers to fight for the return of Crimea, then you are already without us,” he noted.
It is crucial to highlight that the United States has never deployed troops to Ukraine during the conflict, nor has Ukraine requested such involvement. Ukraine’s calls for assistance have centered around military support to enhance its defense capabilities.
Since Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and its subsequent seizures of other Ukrainian territories starting in 2022, these areas have been under dispute. However, Lanza did not address these additional territories during his commentary.
The Kremlin has set a precondition for any negotiations, demanding recognition of the “existing territorial realities,” which implies acknowledging its annexations in regions such as Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporozhye, and Kherson, areas it does not fully control.
Does Lanza represent Trump’s position?
Photo caption: Brian Lanza, who contributed to both Trump campaigns, expressed his views during an interview in 2020 (BBC studios).
The alignment of Lanza’s statements with the official position of the incoming Trump administration remains uncertain.
A transition official reiterated to Reuters that Lanza is not authorized to speak regarding the administration’s priorities for Ukraine.
The transition team is in the midst of appointing key personnel and formulating policy directives in anticipation of Trump’s presidency.
An official from the National Security Council, who previously served under Trump, remarked to the Wall Street Journal that anyone who claims to know the details of Trump’s plans for Ukraine does not understand the situation.
Trump independently navigates national security matters, often influenced by immediate and evolving circumstances.
In his interview, Lanza expressed admiration for the resilience of the Ukrainian people, stating they possess “the hearts of lions.”
He remarked, “We will tell Ukraine: do you know what you see? You see a realistic vision of the world. This is not a vision of victory, but it is a vision of peace. And let’s start an honest conversation.”
Lanza criticized the outgoing Biden administration and European allies for failing to provide Ukraine with the necessary military capabilities and weaponry early on, which could have altered the dynamics of the war in its favor.
What do people around Zelensky say about this?
In response to Lanza’s remarks, Dmitry Lytvyn, an advisor to President Zelensky, highlighted the discrepancy in perspectives, asserting, “These are all words in one direction. The problem is that it is Putin who wants more war, more deaths and more captured land, not Ukraine. Ukraine has been offering peace since 2022 – there are completely realistic proposals. And Russia must be made to hear that peace is needed and that peace must be reliable.”
The text of this article was modified after publication to specify Brian Lanza’s status and clarify his role within the new administration. Additional comments from the Trump transition administration have been included.
Subscribe to our social networks and newsletters
Biden foreign policy
Egional autonomy of some territories while remaining critical of the ongoing conflict and its escalation. This perspective, however, does not translate into an official policy stance from the Trump transition team, which is still in the process of solidifying its approach to Ukraine.
As discussions heat up surrounding the future U.S. involvement in Ukraine, the dichotomy between Lanza’s remarks and the official narrative indicates the complexity of foreign policy under a new administration. It underscores the need for clarity and coherence in U.S. strategy, especially given the high stakes involved in international relations and territorial disputes.
President Zelensky’s administration is faced with the challenge of negotiating peace while retaining territorial integrity, particularly concerning Crimea, which remains a pivotal issue for both parties. Meanwhile, the Kremlin continues to assert its claims and push for acknowledgment of its territorial acquisitions, presenting a significant obstacle to any potential diplomatic resolution.
In the grand scheme, Lanza’s comments suggest a potential pivot for U.S. priorities under Trump, focusing more on pragmatic solutions rather than the idealistic goal of reclaiming lost territories. However, the negotiation table remains fraught with tensions, competing demands, and divergent visions of peace.
As the landscape evolves, the situation will require careful navigation to foster stability in the region. American support, while crucial, will hinge on the alignment of priorities between Ukraine and its allies. In the backdrop of evolving geopolitical dynamics, the world watches closely as the Trump administration prepares to take the reins, hoping for a balance between peace, support for Ukraine, and acknowledgment of the harsh realities on the ground.
