2024-11-15 21:11:00
A 54-year-old was acquitted of murder charges in the Graz Regional Criminal Court on Friday. According to the public prosecutor’s office, he is said to have killed a man by stabbing him in the heart after an argument over money 19 years ago. He left Austria after the incident and was not arrested until 2023. Two witnesses offered different versions of what happened and were themselves considered suspects at times.
“We are in a trial in which nothing is clear,” the defense attorney began her remarks. The public prosecutor had previously described the facts from her perspective. She described how the Georgian was accused by a fellow countryman of stealing money from him in a betting cafe. He then summoned the now 54-year-old to an apartment where he and two other men waited for “Dito,” his nickname.
An argument broke out between the three men and the victim later cut the accused twice with a knife. According to the prosecutor, the suspect left the apartment. The two men met again in the courtyard, and the defendant is said to have delivered “a powerful stab to the heart” of his opponent. According to a witness, the most seriously injured man is said to have said, “Dito stabbed me,” then he died.
“The prosecution is on shaky ground,” the defense attorney was convinced. Your client was threatened by two men in the apartment and tried to escape. “Why would he attempt to kill on the street if he already had the knife in the apartment?” The fact is that a short time later a dead man was lying on the street and a bloody knife that, according to the expert, would have matched the wound, was found in the apartment. The lawyer argued that the 54-year-old did not go back to the apartment.
The defendant did not feel guilty and stated that the victim was drunk and smoking when he left the scene. He had previously been injured with a knife. “Where did he get the knife from?” asked judge Angelika Hacker. “How should I know?” replied the defendant. “Because you were in the apartment,” the chairwoman replied. However, the accused did not provide any information about this. “I have never had a knife in my hand,” he emphasized.
Of the two alleged witnesses, the first told different versions of the crime. In 2005, he said he saw the victim kneeling on the ground and holding her wound. He later described seeing the alleged perpetrator standing nearby. And this time his statement was: “He stabbed him in front of me.” “You didn’t say last year that he stabbed you,” the judge said. “Why didn’t you tell the right story from the beginning?” asked the defense attorney. “I was afraid of him,” said the witness in reference to the defendant. The interviewee also emphasized several times that he had been suffering from “post-traumatic stress disorder” since then, which would also affect his memory.
The jury found the defendant not guilty. The judgment is not final.
1731707596
#Trial #Graz #54yearold #acquitted #murder #charges
What were the key factors that led to the acquittal in the Graz murder case?
**Interview with Legal Expert Dr. Anna Fischer on the Recent Graz Murder Acquittal**
*Interviewer:* Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Fischer. We want to discuss the recent acquittal of a 54-year-old man in Graz who was charged with murder after an incident nearly two decades ago. Can you provide some context on this case?
*Dr. Fischer:* Absolutely. This case has complex layers, starting from the incident that occurred 19 years ago, where the accused, known as “Dito,” was alleged to have killed a man following an argument over money. The fact that he fled Austria and was only apprehended in 2023 raises questions about the nature of this investigation and the evidence gathered over the years.
*Interviewer:* The defense attorney stated, “We are in a trial in which nothing is clear.” What do you think she meant by that?
*Dr. Fischer:* This reflects the uncertainty and conflicting narratives surrounding the events. The case hinged on witness testimonies, which appeared to diverge significantly. Witnesses not only provided different accounts but were also considered suspects at various points. This inconsistency likely played a crucial role in the jury’s decision to acquit, as it creates reasonable doubt about the accused’s guilt.
*Interviewer:* Can you elaborate on the implications of the prosecutor’s narrative versus the defense’s claims?
*Dr. Fischer:* The prosecutor painted a picture of a violent altercation where the accused, after being attacked, retaliated fatally. Conversely, the defense suggests that self-defense was a possibility, as the victim had reportedly attacked “Dito” first. The jury would have had to weigh the credibility of the witnesses and the motivations behind their testimonies, which seems to have led to the decision to acquit.
*Interviewer:* What are the broader implications of this acquittal on the legal system in Austria?
*Dr. Fischer:* This case underscores the challenges in resolving long-standing cases, particularly those involving conflicting witness accounts. It raises questions about the effectiveness of the legal system in handling information that is so obscured by time and differing perspectives. Moreover, it impacts how future cases might be prosecuted, emphasizing the need for robust evidence beyond witness testimony alone.
*Interviewer:* Thank you, Dr. Fischer, for your insights on this complex and intriguing case.
*Dr. Fischer:* My pleasure. Thank you for having me.
