The National Commission of Judicial Discipline confirmed the sentence by which a lawyer was declared responsible for ignoring the duty provided in numeral 6 of article 28 of Law 1123 of 2007, and incurring in the offense contemplated in numeral 9 of article 33 , by way of fraud, for which he was excluded from the profession.
It was shown that the lawyer intervened in fraudulent acts, to the detriment of her client’s interests, by giving her client four pages that corresponded to a sentence issued by a court and two pages of an official letter addressed to a registry office and public instruments, documents that were false, as was shown in the disciplinary investigation.
This happened when the plaintiff’s brother in a membership proceeding went to court to be issued a copy of the sentence and presented the six pages that the disciplined woman had given him.
The secretary of the office confirmed that the signature did not correspond to the judge, and that said process was inadmissible and was never corrected, which led to the certification of copies once morest the lawyer.
The Commission confirmed the sanction imposed upon verifying that the facts set forth in the first instance are duly substantiated and proven (MP Juan Carlos Granados Becerra).
