“There is no peaceful consensus” and “no one knows clearly what this text is”

2024-02-01 12:17:40

The national deputy for Córdoba Rodrigo De Loredo (UCR) questioned the omnibus bill and the last-minute modifications and stated that if “there is no peaceful consensus on what this is because no one knows clearly what this text is.”

“What are these legal texts? A Government plan, the tools that the Government needs for management, a fiscal plan, a plan for economic and tax stability, a cultural battle, a smokescreen, a scapegoat. “The compendium of overdue reforms,” ​​she questioned.

“Who wrote it? When? Where? Does it free us from interests or commit us to other interests? it is urgent? Does it free us from some corporations or subject us to others? There is no peaceful consensus on what this is because no one knows clearly what this text is.”he added.

“This text that we are going to discuss in the chamber has nothing to do with the one that the Executive sent,” and he highlighted: “What we are discussing today is the result of a brutal, untimely, supportive and cooperative work of blocks like ours that they had to deal with and get out of the crossfire, the mutual extortion, the grievances on one side and the other. From that crossroads to build a reasonable, balanced and fair option.”

Throughout his speech, De Loredo compared the proposals during the K administration and those proposed in the omnibus law by La Libertad Avanza: “Among those who put more than 3 million retirees without contributions into the system and dynamited it and the proposal of the Executive to intend to continue with the adjustment with Afores of $110,000, which is what is being discussed today and what this facility managed to remove the aspect of the retirement adjustment from the legal texts.”

“Among those who, with an absolutely hypocritical blocking and obstructive attitude, used all the delegated powers, cornered the Court, co-opted the media, trampled the institutionality of Parliament and Now they do not even give a year of delegation to the president who only has 45 days and the intemperate, nullifying, exaggerated proposal of Parliament in the directive to go once morest the State when a single person asks for all the powers for himself. Today the venue is going to treat a delegation of only one year as appropriate and as other presidents have had.”

“Among those who made a systematic attack on production for ideological reasons or for what is going to happen with the withholdings and the proposal of government that came here that chose the shortest path contradicted its electoral contract and went once morest the regional economies, once morest industrial withholdings, with the withholdings of our main agricultural producers and the text that we are going to discuss here will determine whether Argentina produces more and exports more.”


1706790829
#peaceful #consensus #text

Leave a Replay