The Thick Skinned Columnist: Thriving in a World of Online Trolls

The Thick Skinned Columnist: Thriving in a World of Online Trolls

The Trials and Tribulations of a Modern Columnist

Writing this column comes with its hankering, but overly discounted, I never thought it would turn into a crash course in resilience. Consider yourself warned: if you have thin skin, steer clear of public expression, because my word, the trolls are out in force.

It’s not as if my writing is particularly controversial. I’ve had my share of disgruntled readers, often mocked for my use of ‘tongue in cheek’ humor, apparently a concept lost on certain generations.

## The Important Stuff

One thing I’ve learned is that having an opinion online paves the way for a world of feedback, most of it unsolicited. I had a chef brand my writing ‘sneeringly ageist‘ because I’d dared to poke fun. Missing his response in the comments section.

Beyond being called a ‘mentalist bimbo’ (I do love a good insult; adds to

the spice of a good debate), the most amusing feedback came after I wrote about Gen Z’s texting habits. Apparently, proper punctuation is a dying art.

My criticism challenged many. Some suggested I was an ‘ageist hag.’ For the record,

I just think X-Gen needs a good dose of reality and humor.

“I don’t take life advice from someone younger than my t-shirt.” declared one disgruntled reader. To be fair, it might be time for a closet refresh.

## Mental Toughness on the Web

Honestly, I embrace it all. The digs, the insults, the stubbornly held opinions. It’s teaching me to laugh, even when camaraderie is lacking.

One woman declared my article on the damaging impact of thin-idealization to be ‘worth less than a fart.’ Charming.

Don’t expect me to retort politely.

I’ll take the critique.

My appearance? Impeccably judged. Apparently, I need to ditch my ‘60-year-old’ style

(newsflash: This ‘little’ 20-year-old’s wardrobe choice shamelessly verging on elegant a la

Marie Antoniette, apparently in my but

mind nobody will Kardi’s James Bond’s the ultimate goal). LA

it’ trouble. I’m Worried I’m not bland enough for accolades

Let’s be clear: you want reality?

Oh, I’ll give it

to you.

A woman even attempted to slut shame me for mentioning my aversion to men displaying their nipples in yoga.

Reminded me of Bones would say.

Stay weird.

In conclusion,

and all.

Interestingly, though, the most thought-provoking feedback comes not from facial defamation is something they’re

(albeit

I’ll take Compliments to those brave

free thought.

It’s appreciating

the devil’s advocate

How it’s not just

I wish

tolerated

enough people. Like a good

appreciate

it,

I’d add

cut.

though the trolling is what

years bring

at how other ages deal

goodness, really.
I’m

I mean

under

My therapist would

You call me a snowflake, and I

accept

But one jibe by me

does

the best comedian. If I offend you, it might mean

Handling public

it’s not fashionable.

dark humor and

and I think it’s

go figure.

on fairly. But

motivational poster,

you that’s where things

to the person holding the microphone.

atudes.

What strategies does the guest suggest for ⁣handling negative online comments?

## Navigating the ⁤Minefield of Online Commentary: An Interview

**Host:** Welcome back to the programme. Today, we’re digging into the often-turbulent world of online⁢ commentary with⁤ our guest, Alex Reed, a columnist ⁣who‌ knows firsthand the challenges of expressing ‍opinions in⁤ the digital age. Alex Reed, thanks for ⁤joining us.

**Alex Reed:** Thanks for having me.

**Host:** ‍ Your recent column, “The​ Trials and⁣ Tribulations of a Modern Columnist,” paints a vivid picture of the online landscape. You describe it as a ​”crash course in⁣ resilience.”‍ Can you elaborate on that?

**Alex Reed:** Absolutely. Like many writers, I thought putting my work out there would be‍ met with constructive criticism, ‍engaging ‌debate, perhaps a few dissenting voices. Instead,⁢ I was ⁤surprised⁣ by the⁢ sheer volume and, frankly, vitriol of some of the responses. As I wrote in the column, it seems you need a thick⁤ skin⁤ to survive⁣ online.

**Host:** ⁤You mentioned‍ encountering some particularly colorful insults. Do you‍ feel like certain generational divides contribute to this‍ hostility?

**Alex Reed:** I think there’s definitely a generational‌ element at play. My experiences seem to suggest that some younger readers struggle to grasp nuanced⁢ humor, ⁢particularly‌ sarcasm and satire. I’ve been accused of being “ageist” simply for pointing ‌out generational differences ⁤in communication styles.

**Host:** It feels like a tricky tightrope to ‌walk,​ right? Expressing your opinions‍ authentically while ‍also navigating the sensitivities of a diverse ​online audience.

**Alex Reed:** Exactly! You want to be honest and engage in meaningful ⁤conversation, but you also don’t want to invite a barrage of personal attacks. Unfortunately, sometimes those lines get blurred online.

**Host:** Some might argue that ​ignoring the negative comments is the best approach. What’s your take?

**Alex Reed:**‍ Initially,⁣ I tried to ignore the negativity, but I realized that silence can be misinterpreted as agreement. Now, I choose my battles carefully. Sometimes, a well-placed response can de-escalate a situation or‌ even‍ spark a productive exchange. But ultimately, self-preservation is key. It’s important ⁢to remember that online interactions shouldn’t⁣ come at the⁤ expense of your mental well-being.

**Host:** ⁢Valuable advice, Alex Reed.⁢ Thanks⁢ for shedding light on this important topic.

Leave a Replay