This is one of the hottest issues on the agenda of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation. It refers to the conflict between the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires and the national government over federal co-participation. Truly, the provinces are the most interested and affected by the issueand they made it known at the meeting held in Corrientes between the governors of the Norte Grande Argentino and some ministers of the National Cabinet.
In this framework, it transpired that the ruling would come out on December 20, which caused a state of alarm both in the Executive branch and in the provinces and in CABA.
From the CABA side, they maintain that it is a precautionary measure that has been in court for two years, which is unusual for a measure that is supposed to be urgent and that should have been resolved a long time ago. From CABA they hoped that the decision would be made in November but, remarkably and without any reason, was postponed by decision of Rosatti, who, being the president of the highest court, has the power to decide which are the files that go to the agreement. Some sectors argue that it was a direct request from the ruling party.
It may interest you: The Supreme Court of Mendoza will decide if Guaymallén will have a Queen of the Harvest
Faced with criticism, Rosatti’s spokespersons made it known that the issue would be dealt with before the end of the year, on December 20. This information worried the representatives of CABA even more, since they consider that the collection of the funds that correspond to them would be very difficult to achieve before the end of the year. The last precedent is the case of the co-participation in Córdoba, Santa Fe and San Luis, where there was a very slow implementation process. On the side of the ruling party there are as many opinions as there are sectors.
Originally it had been decided to resolve the precautionary measure requested by CABA in the agreement of Thursday, November 24 at ten in the morning, as anticipated infobae. But, for reasons not yet explained, the file was not discussed at that meeting. Likewise, as this medium was able to learn, in addition to the conciliatory hearings and the meetings of lawyers, there is a draft sentence ready to be voted on.
Beyond the figure of Rosatti, when consulted, the committees preferred to be cautious and point out that the issue will be dealt with in the next agreements on December 6 or 13, as corresponds to the agenda of the Court. The situation, by all accounts, appears to be complex for all parties involved.
Keep reading:
