The Spanish Congress rejects a proposal against Claudia Sheinbaum

MADRID, Spain.— The Congress of Deputies of Spain rejected the proposal promoted by the Vox parties y Popular (PP) in which it was called to condemn the president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum Pardofor not inviting your inauguration al king Philip VIhead of the Spanish State.

With 19 votes against Spanish Socialist Workers Party (PSOE) and the Catalan, Basque and Galician nationalists rejected the proposal, which obtained 17 votes in favor.

Vox stance

On October 3, the Vox party presented its proposal, to which it added an amendment formulated by the PP.

The intention was for the Congress of Deputies to make the following message public and official:

“As a representative of the Spanish people, and with the utmost respect for the brother people of Mexico (sic), I condemn the attitude expressed by the president (sic) of the United Mexican States, Claudia Sheinbaum, against the figure of the head of State, His Majesty. Felipe VI and, therefore, the Spanish people.”

It was also proposed to urge “the government to disapprove the presence of Spanish political representatives at the inauguration” of Claudia Sheinbaum because, according to these political organizations, it represented “an attack on the figure” of the king.

It also proposed that the government “take appropriate measures to defend the historical legacy of Spain in Mexico (sic).”

Position of the Spanish Government

At the end of September, the President of the Spanish Government, Pedro Sánchez, established his position regarding the exclusion of the king from the inauguration of Claudia Sheinbaum and assured that no representative of his administration would attend the event.

You might also be interested: “PAN sends letter to King Felipe VI after being excluded from Sheinbaum’s investiture”

#Spanish #Congress #rejects #proposal #Claudia #Sheinbaum

How might the rejection⁢ of Vox’s‍ proposal influence future political strategies for both Vox and the Socialist Workers Party in Spain?

‍**Interview ⁤with Political Analyst Maria Fernández on ‍the ⁢Rejection of the‌ Vox Proposal in Spain**

**Editor:** Good afternoon, Maria. Thank you for joining‍ us ⁣today. ​

**Maria Fernández:** Thank you for having me!

**Editor:** Let’s dive right in. The Congress of Deputies in Spain recently rejected ⁢a proposal from the‌ Vox ‌and Popular parties to condemn President Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico for not ⁤inviting King Felipe VI to her inauguration. What do you think motivated Vox to propose such a resolution?

**Maria Fernández:** Vox has a history of nationalist sentiment ​and a ​desire⁤ to assert Spain’s​ historical influence, particularly in Latin America. ‍The proposal seems to stem from a perception that⁤ Sheinbaum’s snub represents a broader disrespect for Spanish history ⁢and relations. By framing it ⁣as a condemnation, Vox ​is attempting to rally‍ support from‌ those who feel a strong patriotic connection to Spain’s past.

**Editor:** Indeed, the ⁣proposal⁢ received 19 votes against from the Spanish Socialist Workers Party​ (PSOE) and various nationalist parties. Why do you think these parties opposed it?

**Maria Fernández:** The PSOE and the ‌regional nationalist parties likely viewed⁢ the proposal as politically charged and unnecessary. They may see it as‍ a ​diversion from more pressing‌ domestic issues ⁢or⁤ as​ a way ⁣for Vox to advance its agenda ⁤of nationalism under the guise ⁣of patriotism. Rejecting⁢ the proposal allows them to distance themselves from a confrontational stance against an ally nation like Mexico.

**Editor:** Vox leader Santiago Abascal ⁤tweeted that Sheinbaum is continuing ‍a “stupid offense” against Spain’s history.‍ How does this rhetoric resonate with the Spanish populace?

**Maria Fernández:** Such rhetoric appeals to a segment⁣ of the population that prioritizes national pride and historical grievances. However,‍ it can also alienate others who favor a more nuanced and diplomatic ⁣approach‍ to international relations. The tweet reflects Vox’s strategy of positioning themselves as defenders of Spanish identity, but it⁢ risks ⁣escalating tensions rather than fostering constructive⁢ dialogue.

**Editor:** What implications do you foresee from the‌ Congress’s ⁢rejection of this‌ proposal, both for⁢ Spanish-Mexican relations and for ⁢Vox’s political strategy?

**Maria Fernández:** The rejection may indicate a preference for maintaining‍ diplomatic relations over indulging in nationalist rhetoric, which⁤ is ‌essential given the historical ​ties between Spain and Latin America. For Vox, although this rejection could be seen as a setback, they may use ⁤it to rally their base further, portraying‍ themselves as victims of a political system that ignores Spain’s traditional values. we might see⁤ both parties recalibrating their strategies in the upcoming elections, focusing more on issues that resonate with their respective voter bases.

**Editor:** ⁤Thank you, Maria, for your insights on ⁤this developing⁢ situation. ⁣It’s always a pleasure to hear your perspective.

**Maria Fernández:** Thank you! It’s been great⁣ discussing this important issue.

Leave a Replay