The Spanish Congress rejects a proposal against Claudia Sheinbaum

MADRID, Spain.— The Congress of Deputies of Spain rejected the proposal promoted by the Vox parties y Popular (PP) in which it was called to condemn the president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum Pardofor not inviting your inauguration al king Philip VIhead of the Spanish State.

With 19 votes against Spanish Socialist Workers Party (PSOE) and the Catalan, Basque and Galician nationalists rejected the proposal, which obtained 17 votes in favor.

Vox stance

On October 3, the Vox party presented its proposal, to which it added an amendment formulated by the PP.

The intention was for the Congress of Deputies to make the following message public and official:

“As a representative of the Spanish people, and with the utmost respect for the brother people of Mexico (sic), I condemn the attitude expressed by the president (sic) of the United Mexican States, Claudia Sheinbaum, against the figure of the head of State, His Majesty. Felipe VI and, therefore, the Spanish people.”

It was also proposed to urge “the government to disapprove the presence of Spanish political representatives at the inauguration” of Claudia Sheinbaum because, according to these political organizations, it represented “an attack on the figure” of the king.

It also proposed that the government “take appropriate measures to defend the historical legacy of Spain in Mexico (sic).”

Position of the Spanish Government

At the end of September, the President of the Spanish Government, Pedro Sánchez, established his position regarding the exclusion of the king from the inauguration of Claudia Sheinbaum and assured that no representative of his administration would attend the event.

You might also be interested: “PAN sends letter to King Felipe VI after being excluded from Sheinbaum’s investiture”

#Spanish #Congress #rejects #proposal #Claudia #Sheinbaum

⁣What impact⁢ might the ‌rejection by the Congress of Deputies ​to condemn President Claudia⁢ Sheinbaum have on Spain’s political landscape?

**Interview with ⁢Dr. Marta ‍Salinas, Political Analyst at⁤ the‌ Universidad Complutense de Madrid**

**Editor:**⁢ Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Salinas. The recent rejection by the Congress of Deputies to condemn⁢ President Claudia ⁢Sheinbaum of Mexico has sparked significant debate.​ What are your ⁢initial thoughts on this development?

**Dr. Salinas:** Thank you for having me.⁣ This rejection highlights the growing divisions in Spanish politics, particularly regarding foreign relations. The fact that the ‍proposal didn’t gain enough support from⁢ the majority party ‍and several regional nationalists‍ indicates that ‌there is a strong sentiment against engaging in political theatrics ‌that could further strain⁤ ties with Mexico.

**Editor:** Vox and the Popular‍ Party (PP) argued that⁣ the⁤ omission ​of King ‍Felipe VI from the inauguration was an affront to‍ Spain’s historical ties with Mexico. Do you believe⁤ this​ perspective resonates with Spanish citizens?

**Dr. Salinas:** While Vox’s narrative‌ appeals to a certain nationalist sentiment, many Spaniards recognize the complexities of international relations today. Most citizens prioritize diplomacy over public displays of outrage, understanding that relationships with other nations, like Mexico, require dialogue and mutual respect rather than condemnation.

**Editor:** There are also voices⁢ within Spain that argue this rejection⁤ might ⁣reflect broader political strategies beyond just ​the immediate issue of the inauguration. What do you think about this?

**Dr. Salinas:** Absolutely. This situation is emblematic ⁢of the larger ideological battles ⁤at play in Spain. The rejection can be seen as a strategic move by the ​PSOE and their allies to distance themselves from Vox’s right-wing‌ populism. Moreover, it reinforces a ​narrative of progressive governance, focusing⁢ on collaboration rather than conflict in foreign affairs.

**Editor:** Santiago Abascal of Vox has made strong statements regarding President López Obrador’s ⁤government. Do you‌ think such outbursts help or hinder Spain’s⁤ diplomatic ties?

**Dr. Salinas:** These statements ​often do ‌more ⁢harm than good. They​ can⁣ alienate governments that are already‍ cautious about historical grievances. In diplomatic relations, it’s crucial to maintain ‍a tone that encourages⁢ engagement rather than provocation. Abascal’s rhetoric risks further fragmentation rather than fostering constructive dialogue.

**Editor:** What does this situation mean ‍for‍ future Spain-Mexico relations?

**Dr. Salinas:** It underscores the ⁣importance of maintaining open⁢ channels of communication. While‌ the political dynamics in Spain may influence specific incidents like the inauguration, both countries have deep-rooted connections that‌ can⁢ serve as a⁤ foundation for collaboration. Future⁣ relations will likely depend on diplomatic efforts that transcend current political tensions.

**Editor:** Thank ⁢you,⁢ Dr. Salinas, for your​ insights on this important issue.

**Dr. Salinas:** Thank you for having me.

Leave a Replay