The Spanish Congress rejects a proposal against Claudia Sheinbaum

MADRID, Spain.— The Congress of Deputies of Spain rejected the proposal promoted by the Vox parties y Popular (PP) in which it was called to condemn the president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum Pardofor not inviting your inauguration al king Philip VIhead of the Spanish State.

With 19 votes against Spanish Socialist Workers Party (PSOE) and the Catalan, Basque and Galician nationalists rejected the proposal, which obtained 17 votes in favor.

Vox stance

On October 3, the Vox party presented its proposal, to which it added an amendment formulated by the PP.

The intention was for the Congress of Deputies to make the following message public and official:

“As a representative of the Spanish people, and with the utmost respect for the brother people of Mexico (sic), I condemn the attitude expressed by the president (sic) of the United Mexican States, Claudia Sheinbaum, against the figure of the head of State, His Majesty. Felipe VI and, therefore, the Spanish people.”

It was also proposed to urge “the government to disapprove the presence of Spanish political representatives at the inauguration” of Claudia Sheinbaum because, according to these political organizations, it represented “an attack on the figure” of the king.

It also proposed that the government “take appropriate measures to defend the historical legacy of Spain in Mexico (sic).”

Position of the Spanish Government

At the end of September, the President of the Spanish Government, Pedro Sánchez, established his position regarding the exclusion of the king from the inauguration of Claudia Sheinbaum and assured that no representative of his administration would attend the event.

You might also be interested: “PAN sends letter to King Felipe VI after being excluded from Sheinbaum’s investiture”

#Spanish #Congress #rejects #proposal #Claudia #Sheinbaum

What effect does‌ the rejection of the proposal to condemn President ​Sheinbaum have on Spain’s political landscape⁤ regarding nationalism?

**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today. We’re here to discuss the recent rejection by the Congress of Deputies of Spain regarding the ‌proposal led ​by the ⁤Vox party and the​ Popular​ Party⁤ to condemn ⁢Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. ‍What are your thoughts on the significance of this‌ decision?

**Guest:** Thank you for having me. This decision is quite important as it​ reflects a clear divide ‍in Spanish‌ politics. The rejection indicates ⁣that not all parties⁢ agree⁣ with ⁣Vox’s approach⁢ to foreign relations, particularly regarding Mexico ⁢and its leadership. The ⁣PSOE, ​along with various⁢ regional parties, recognizes the ​complexity of international diplomacy and the need to maintain respectful ties with other ⁤nations, including⁢ our historical connections with Mexico.

**Interviewer:** Vox has been quite vocal ‍about its stance on ⁤President Sheinbaum, linking her actions to those of‍ her predecessor, Andrés Manuel López Obrador. How do you ‌interpret their criticism?

**Guest:** Vox’s criticism stems from a narrative that frames Sheinbaum ⁤as continuing a negative‌ legacy ⁢related to Mexico’s governance. They argue that she has disrespected Spain’s historical significance. However, it’s noteworthy that criticisms like these are deeply intertwined with⁣ domestic⁤ politics in ​Spain.​ Vox seems to be trying to‍ rally nationalist sentiments, but this⁢ can ⁣also alienate more moderate voices who believe in ​fostering positive diplomatic relations.

**Interviewer:** The⁣ proposal aimed to officially condemn Sheinbaum’s actions and urge the Spanish government to respond. ⁤What implications could this have had for Spain-Mexico relations ‌if it had passed?

**Guest:** If ⁤the proposal had been accepted, it could have soured diplomatic relations between Spain and Mexico. An official condemnation would signal ⁢that Spain is unwilling to⁣ overlook what it perceives as disrespect. This ‍might ⁣lead to⁤ retaliatory measures from Mexico or‌ further strain existing ties that have historical and cultural significance.‌ Diplomatic relations thrive on mutual‌ respect, ⁤and this proposal could have jeopardized that.

**Interviewer:** What might ‌this rejection indicate about the current political⁤ climate in​ Spain concerning nationalism and foreign policy towards Latin America?

**Guest:** The​ rejection signals a pushback against extreme nationalist rhetoric. Many Spaniards are deeply aware of historical injustices and the‌ importance of maintaining constructive relations ‍in‌ Latin‍ America. Spain’s colonial past ⁣weighs heavily ⁣on its foreign policy today, and ​there is a ‍growing sentiment that‌ we should⁢ prioritize collaboration over condemnation. ‍This move by Congress might reflect a broader inclination towards a ‌more balanced and⁣ respectful approach to international engagement.

**Interviewer:** Thank‌ you for ‌sharing your insights ​today. ⁢It will⁣ be interesting to see how these dynamics play out in the future.

**Guest:**⁢ Absolutely, and thank you for discussing this‍ important issue!

Leave a Replay