The Spanish Congress rejects a proposal against Claudia Sheinbaum

MADRID, Spain.— The Congress of Deputies of Spain rejected the proposal promoted by the Vox parties y Popular (PP) in which it was called to condemn the president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum Pardofor not inviting your inauguration al king Philip VIhead of the Spanish State.

With 19 votes against Spanish Socialist Workers Party (PSOE) and the Catalan, Basque and Galician nationalists rejected the proposal, which obtained 17 votes in favor.

Vox stance

On October 3, the Vox party presented its proposal, to which it added an amendment formulated by the PP.

The intention was for the Congress of Deputies to make the following message public and official:

“As a representative of the Spanish people, and with the utmost respect for the brother people of Mexico (sic), I condemn the attitude expressed by the president (sic) of the United Mexican States, Claudia Sheinbaum, against the figure of the head of State, His Majesty. Felipe VI and, therefore, the Spanish people.”

It was also proposed to urge “the government to disapprove the presence of Spanish political representatives at the inauguration” of Claudia Sheinbaum because, according to these political organizations, it represented “an attack on the figure” of the king.

It also proposed that the government “take appropriate measures to defend the historical legacy of Spain in Mexico (sic).”

Position of the Spanish Government

At the end of September, the President of the Spanish Government, Pedro Sánchez, established his position regarding the exclusion of the king from the inauguration of Claudia Sheinbaum and assured that no representative of his administration would attend the event.

You might also be interested: “PAN sends letter to King Felipe VI after being excluded from Sheinbaum’s investiture”

#Spanish #Congress #rejects #proposal #Claudia #Sheinbaum

How does‌ the rejection of the proposal reflect the ⁢current‌ political dynamics in Spain?

**Interview with Dr. Elena Martínez, Political Analyst**

**Editor:** ‌Welcome, Dr. Martínez! Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent rejection of the proposal in the Spanish ​Congress regarding President Claudia Sheinbaum of ⁤Mexico.

**Dr. Martínez:** Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to discuss this important issue.

**Editor:** Let’s start with the proposal itself. Sponsored by the Vox and Popular parties, it​ sought to condemn President Sheinbaum for not inviting ⁢King Felipe VI to her inauguration. What are‌ your thoughts on why this proposal was put forth?

**Dr. Martínez:** The proposal ​appears to be rooted in a larger nationalist sentiment that Vox and PP‍ have been championing. They often frame issues such as this within a context of historical grievances and national prestige. By condemning Sheinbaum, they aim to assert ‌Spain’s importance on ⁤the global stage, especially in relation to its former colonies.

**Editor:** The proposal was rejected by​ the majority, including the PSOE ‍and​ various nationalist‌ parties. What does this say about the political landscape in ‍Spain?

**Dr. Martínez:** ‍The rejection​ highlights a significant divide in Spanish politics. The PSOE’s opposition indicates⁢ a desire to maintain diplomatic relations with Mexico and a refusal to engage in ‍what may be ⁢perceived as ⁢unnecessary diplomatic tension. ⁣Nationalist parties may be prioritizing regional issues and a more inclusive approach to Spain’s relationship with its neighbors.

**Editor:** ⁣Vox leader ⁣Santiago Abascal characterized President López Obrador’s⁢ tenure and Sheinbaum’s presidency negatively. How⁣ do such statements ‍resonate in Spain, and what impact do they have⁢ on bilateral⁢ relations?

**Dr. Martínez:** Statements like Abascal’s can stir a reaction among his base, which often resonates‍ with sentiments of nationalism and historical grievances. ‍However, they could isolate Spain diplomatically. Many Spaniards, particularly those aligned with the PSOE⁢ and other progressive parties, might view such rhetoric as harmful, undermining the potential for⁢ constructive dialogue.

**Editor:** what does this rejection mean for future interactions between Spain and Mexico, particularly ‍in​ light of upcoming international discussions?

**Dr. Martínez:** This rejection suggests that Spain may prioritize a ​more respectful and productive relationship with Mexico moving forward.‌ It opens the door for potential⁣ collaboration rather than confrontation. ⁢The Spanish government may focus on building alliances and engaging with Mexico⁣ on issues like ⁢trade, cultural exchange, and regional stability, ​rather than allowing historical grievances to dictate the terms of engagement.

**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Martínez,‌ for your insights. It will be interesting to see how this ‍plays out in the context of Spain-Mexico relations moving forward.

**Dr.‍ Martínez:** Absolutely! ⁣Thank you for this engaging conversation.

Leave a Replay