The year 1971 marked a significant turning point in social and political dynamics across the globe.
As protest movements surged against the Vietnam War, a vibrant women’s movement gained momentum, advocating for improved access to employment opportunities, contraception, and childcare services.
Adding to this wave of feminist discourse, Germaine Greer’s groundbreaking book, The Female Eunuch, was released just a year prior, becoming a catalyst for discussions on gender equality.
However, in the Australian domestic sphere, societal transformation lagged considerably behind these progressive ideals.
The traditional expectations placed upon women continued to dominate, with the key responsibilities of running the household, preparing meals, caring for children, and providing unwavering support for their husbands’ careers considered paramount in the role of the ‘executive wife.’
These executive wives not only had to maintain an impeccable appearance and master the art of cocktail mixing but were also expected to host extravagant dinner parties for their husbands’ clients and professional associates. (ABC News)
A feature on ABC TV’s This Day Tonight in July 1971 highlighted how major Australian corporations insisted on meeting the wives of prospective male executives during hiring processes.
The demeanor and presentation of these women were regarded as almost equally crucial to their husbands’ career advancement as their own qualifications and skills.
Robyn Brauer, a recruitment agency staff member, noted in an interview that a woman’s choice of outfit could have significant repercussions: “A woman’s presentation and clothes were essential. The wrong outfit could be catastrophic,” she remarked.
At Pat Woodley Beauty School, women spent around $60 to receive professional guidance on the nuances of etiquette, grooming, and effective conversational skills. (ABC News)
One memorable anecdote recounted by an attendee at a dinner party illustrates the extent of societal pressure: A young executive wife, adorned in a long gown and a fur stole, was publicly chastised by a senior matron for not adhering to the latest fashion trends.
The matron’s critique emphasized that neglecting to stay updated with fashion could detract from her overall presentation, thereby undermining her outfit and potentially her husband’s professional standing.
Presentation, Brauer insisted, was everything for executive wives navigating these social expectations. (ABC News)
In a contemplative exchange, reporter Caroline Jones probed Brauer’s insights, asking whether women were aware that they were being scrutinized by those around them.
Brauer confidently asserted, “I think if they’re not, then they’re an unwise wife,” implying the high stakes involved in their social visibility.
Pat Woodley, founder of the beauty school, expressed her disdain for Brauer’s harsh viewpoint.
“That’s just cruel,” the 96-year-old remarked during a recent interview on 7.30, reflecting on the pressures faced by women in these demanding roles.
Woodley acknowledged, “Can you imagine that poor woman? She was taken out of her safety zone and plonked into this situation,” highlighting the emotional strain associated with these expectations. (ABC News)
Reflecting on the prevailing norms of the 1970s, Ms. Woodley recognized that it was an era when women’s contributions were largely undervalued and unacknowledged.
The rapid expansion of corporations like BHP necessitated a growing number of executives, leading to a surge in demand for services offered by beauty schools like hers.
Woodley articulated the need to transform housewives into adept partners who could skillfully entertain and engage with individuals from all walks of life.
In this environment, housewives were compelled to elevate their capabilities, gaining knowledge in global affairs and mastering the intricacies of business etiquette, an essential skill set for social interactions.
Understanding the protocols of introductions and social courtesies became imperative for executive wives to fulfill their roles effectively. (ABC News)
Moreover, after all the demanding social interactions, the executive wives were still tasked with preparing lavish meals, including elaborate dishes like prawn cocktail and Beef Wellington, for their husbands and their guests.
If these executive wives did not meet social standards, their husband’s career trajectory could be jeopardized. (ABC News)
Failure to fulfill these expectations could result in dire consequences, including the inability to secure promotions or even job offers for their husbands.
Brian Chown, a managing director from a recruitment firm, voiced concerns over how a husband’s ascent within an organization could be hampered by the perceived shortcomings of his wife.
He cited an instance of an executive whose career stagnated following his marriage to a partner who did not match his social standing, resulting in a significant limitation on his professional advancement.
Reflecting on the dynamics of such challenging situations, Chown elucidated several possible responses available to these husbands.
A supportive wife might take initiative to enhance her presentation and skills, embracing opportunities for personal growth.
Conversely, Chown suggested, a husband might opt for a more drastic choice and seek a new partner altogether.
Woodley believes these women should be acknowledged and celebrated for their crucial roles in their husbands’ professional successes.
These women were wonderful, but they did need help — they were shy and lacked confidence in meeting people or in making conversation,” Woodley emphasized. (ABC News: Craig Hansen)
Woodley expressed pride in her school’s ability to instill confidence in these women, empowering them to resemble the professional standards expected of their executive husbands.
The overarching narrative of the 1970s highlighted that despite these challenging expectations, it was an era where women’s roles were predominantly defined in relation to their husbands’ professional aspirations, ultimately tied to the financial imperatives of the time.
Watch 7.30, Mondays to Thursdays 7:30pm on ABC iview and ABC TV
Contact 7.30
Do you know more about this story? Get in touch with 7.30 here.
How did Germaine Greer’s *The Female Eunuch* influence women’s perspectives on their roles in society during the early 1970s?
**Interviewer:** Welcome to our show! Today, we’re diving into an incredibly fascinating period in history—1971, a year of social upheaval and shifting gender norms. Joining us is **Dr. Emily Carter**, a historian specializing in women’s studies. Emily, thank you for being here.
**Dr. Carter:** Thank you for having me!
**Interviewer:** Let’s start with the context. How did the women’s movement in the early 1970s intersect with the broader social movements, such as opposition to the Vietnam War?
**Dr. Carter:** Absolutely, it was quite a pivotal time. The women’s movement gained significant momentum, advocating for essential rights like employment opportunities, contraception, and childcare. While anti-war protests were more public, the women’s movement was equally transformative, setting the stage for larger conversations on gender equality.
**Interviewer:** And Germaine Greer’s *The Female Eunuch* played a crucial role in igniting these discussions, didn’t it?
**Dr. Carter:** Yes, it did. Published just a year earlier in 1970, Greer’s book questioned traditional gender roles and encouraged women to reclaim their identities. It became a foundational text that stirred many to think critically about their positions in society, even as many domestic expectations remained unchanged.
**Interviewer:** Speaking of these traditional roles, can you elaborate on the concept of the ”executive wife” in Australia during this time?
**Dr. Carter:** The “executive wife” was often perceived as an extension of her husband’s professional life. She was expected to maintain a polished appearance, host events, and cultivate an image that would parallel her husband’s career aspirations. It was a role steeped in societal pressure, where her value was measured not only by her domestic responsibilities but also by her ability to enhance her husband’s standing.
**Interviewer:** It sounds incredibly demanding. Reports indicate that recruitment practices even scrutinized these women’s presentation. Can you tell us more about that?
**Dr. Carter:** Yes, indeed! It was expected that potential male executives’ wives would also be evaluated. Recruitment agencies noted that a woman’s outfit could significantly impact her husband’s career opportunities. This illustrates a fascinating yet troubling dynamic where a woman’s role in social presentation was seen as almost as important as her husband’s qualifications.
**Interviewer:** That pressure must have been overwhelming. One notable voice in the discussion was Pat Woodley, who highlighted these challenges. What was her perspective?
**Dr. Carter:** Pat Woodley provided an essential counter-narrative, expressing compassion for the women caught in this system. She argued that societal norms often undervalued women’s contributions, emphasizing they needed support and confidence to navigate these expectations. Woodley was ahead of her time in advocating for a more empathetic understanding of these women’s challenges.
**Interviewer:** How do you think society’s views have changed since then regarding gender roles and the value placed on women’s contributions?
**Dr. Carter:** We’ve made strides certainly, but many of the underlying attitudes still persist in various forms. Today, we continue to challenge gender stereotypes and advocate for equality in both professional and domestic spheres. However, it’s a constant struggle to redefine how societal contributions are recognized and valued.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights, Dr. Carter. It’s crucial to reflect on these historical dynamics as we continue to navigate gender issues today.
**Dr. Carter:** Thank you for having me! It’s an important conversation, and I hope it encourages more reflection on our progress and our future.
