The prosecutor who beat her ex-spouse was fired: the courtroom determined that it was too merciless

The administration of the prosecutor’s workplace assessed the officer’s fall in her private life so drastically – in a single battle state of affairs, in entrance of the youngsters, the lady didn’t keep away from violence towards her ex-spouse, with whom the divorce was unsuccessful with out anger.

After the victory – a brand new problem

The courtroom didn’t agree with lots of the arguments of the dismissed prosecutor – she assessed the circumstances, in all probability subjectively. Nevertheless, Elyja Snieškaitė ended the authorized dispute because the winner on the basic concern – her dismissal from the prosecutor’s workplace was acknowledged as a gross authorized error.

True, following the preliminary verdict of the case indicated that E. Snieškaitė ought to be returned to her earlier place, the legal professionals of the prosecutor’s workplace once more hurried to take countermeasures – they filed an attraction with a better occasion courtroom.

In addition they demanded ethical compensation

In a civil case, the Vilnius District Administrative Court docket (VAAT) determined to annul the choice of the Prosecutor Common of the Republic of Lithuania (LR) Nida Grunskienė to nominate prosecutor Elyja Snieškaitei an official punishment – dismissal from her duties and returned the prosecutor to her earlier place because the prosecutor of the Vilnius District Prosecutor’s Workplace of the Vilnius District Prosecutor’s Workplace.

In response to the lawyer, the prosecutor’s workplace made false and formal conclusions relating to the alleged gross violation of E. Snieškaitė.

In response to Giedrius Abromavičius, the lawyer of the applicant’s consultant, the Common Prosecutor’s Workplace (GP) of the Republic of Lithuania improperly and formally performed an official misconduct investigation, unjustifiably didn’t assess the numerous circumstances justifying the applicant’s actions in defending towards the violation of her rights, and subsequently made false and formal conclusions relating to the allegedly dedicated gross violation. In response to the lawyer, because the prosecutor’s workplace publicly revealed knowledge in regards to the applicant’s private life, the applicant additionally demanded non-pecuniary damages from GP.

“Though the ultimate courtroom determination has not but been made on this case, the Vilnius District Administrative Court docket’s determination to cancel the unlawful dismissal is a crucial step as a way to defend the violated rights and the defamed identify and status of prosecutor Elyja Snieškaitė”, – commenting on the state of affairs 15minemphasised lawyer Giedrius Abromavičius.

15min delved into the litigation of the primary occasion. It turned clear why the courtroom, despite the fact that it was satisfied of the inappropriate violent habits of the prosecutor in a personal surroundings, however acknowledged her dismissal as an unfair evaluation of the state of affairs.