“I’ve counted all of the clips and the variety of clips corresponded,” L. Petronienė stated regarding G. Nausėda’s tv commercial on Monday whereas testifying to the short-term investigation fee of the Seimas.
The Seimas fee is investigating the knowledge of Tomas Gailius, the spokesperson of the Division of State Safety (VSD), concerning the actions of his managers in checking the workforce of G. Nausėda, who ran for the elections, in addition to different points, together with the funds of the 2019 presidential marketing campaign.
After profitable the elections, G. Nausėda formally acknowledged that he collected 291 thousand for the marketing campaign. euros, and the bills barely exceeding 300 thousand. euros. At the moment, the market analysis and monitoring firm “Kantar” introduced that G. Nausėda’s bills for the marketing campaign exceeded 600 thousand. euros.
In line with L. Petronienė, when checking the funds of the candidates, the studies of the candidates themselves, public data producers and monitoring information are in contrast, the quantity of promoting unfold is assessed, and suspicions come up if these figures don’t match, as a result of the ultimate monitoring information don’t correspond to the precise bills of the candidates.
The pinnacle of the CEC famous that the monitoring information additionally consists of features corresponding to viewership, calculates the worth of promoting on the market value, with out reductions, and “the quantities there by no means match.”
“We all know that the costs are very imprecise, we consider the variety of clips and articles – that was right,” stated L. Petronienė.
“We take the information and evaluate whether or not they’re declared, as a result of TNS evaluates based mostly on viewership, doesn’t consider reductions, and the media exhibits what reductions they utilized, why they utilized them,” stated the top of the fee.
L. Petronienė, who headed the CEC’s Political Events and Political Campaigns Financing Management Division through the earlier presidential election marketing campaign, confirmed this following checking the funds of G. Nausėda’s marketing campaign herself.
The pinnacle of the CEC stated that the workers of the monetary management division have been divided by lot, who would verify which candidate, and it was G. Nausėda’s flip.
G. Nausėda, in comparison with his essential rivals, had half much less funds in his election account, though the monitoring firm estimated the unfold and worth of his promoting equally to these of his rivals.
If G. Nausėda’s marketing campaign account had regarding 300 thousand. euros, his competitor, the present Prime Minister Ingrida Šimonytė, had twice as a lot – 693 thousand. euros, then Prime Minister Saulius Skvernelis, who didn’t make it to the second spherical, collected nearly 595 thousand for the marketing campaign. euros, they each spent all of the collected funds on the marketing campaign.
G. Nausėda defined the distinction in bills with frugality and the work of volunteers, whereas earlier commenting on the variations in official bills, he acknowledged that the candidates of events with price range grants “sprinkled cash left and proper”.
Rejecting suspicions regarding probably non-transparent financing of the marketing campaign, G. Nausėda additionally asserts that he’s able to reply the fee’s questions in writing.
Paulius Tamulionis, head of public relations company “Thought Prima”, who testified to the fee on Monday regarding his function in G. Nausėda’s election marketing campaign, stated that he principally communicated with the candidate even earlier than the beginning of the marketing campaign, the creation of the headquarters, and through this era his contribution was the best, however he didn’t ask for a reward for it .
The fee was investigating the knowledge revealed by the information portal “15min” greater than three years in the past that G. Nausėda might have obtained companies from the communication enterprise for which he didn’t pay: he was consulted totally free and the businessman P. Tamulionis contributed to the marketing campaign, and comparable companies might value round 100,000 . euros.
“We began speaking from January 2018 till autumn, when the choice to take part within the elections was introduced, I participated very actively, and in direction of the election marketing campaign my contribution decreased and disappeared,” stated P. Tamulionis.
He stated that it was not a service, however “communication throughout free time, as a pure individual to a pure individual”.
G. Nausėda had signed a contract with Thought Prima through the marketing campaign, however, as P. Tamulionis stated, the company’s companies weren’t wanted as a lot as he had imagined. The company was paid over 9 thousand for its companies. euros.
Former and present heads of the prosecutor’s workplace, the Particular Investigations Service, in addition to the whistleblower who determined to not conceal his id, the previous head of one of many VSD boards, T. Gailius, have already testified to the fee.
Whereas testifying to the fee, the latter confirmed that he had seen data relating to the probably non-transparent financing of the 2019 presidential election marketing campaign whereas working in intelligence, however didn’t single out a particular candidate.
T. Gailius additionally stated that he suspected that his managers may need dedicated a disciplinary violation or perhaps a crime once they commissioned an inspection of G. Nausėda’s setting and probably transferred the inspection outcomes to 3rd events who wouldn’t have the correct to work with categorized data. That is why T. Gailius stated that he turned to politicians and have become a speaker.
After his testimony, the VSD reiterated that they adopted the legislation when checking G. Nausėda’s setting.
Within the ebook “The Speaker and the President” revealed in early 2023, a part of the content material of which relies on the tales of T. Gailius, questions are raised concerning the transparency of the financing of the election marketing campaign of G. Nausėdas.
#CEC #main #discrepancies #Nausėdas #election #monetary #studies
2024-06-20 13:59:48
