} of the. Essam Noman*
read Lebanon finally, by tongue president Republic Michel help, “Happening demarcation marine” that I cooked it the states United Across her broker Amos Hockstein.
Lebanon no It is considered “Happening demarcation marine” treaty with evidence that president Republic did not abide tightly Subject 52 From the Constitution that spend that “take over president Republic bargaining in a necklace Treaties International and conclude it by agreement with president the government, Nor become sealed Except distance consent board Ministers”. And because of that not treaty in understandable as such in Concept Main board Representatives and the government, Lost sang the bosses the three About consent board Representatives.
“Israel” considered “Happening demarcation marine, by tongue president her government Yair lapid, an achievement historically Finally what Regard with borders with Lebanon. Minister energy Karen Harar claimed that “Lebanese back off (…) and all demands Israeli done approval on her”. newspaper “Yedioth Ahronoth” explained her words that “the agreement Shows the border Navy that put it “Israel” and date western head galleries and stretch on me the length five kilometers in region floaters that Posted by “Israel” in Past”.
President American of the Biden here the presidents Lebanese And”Israeli” saying: “you all you make Date”! But he allocate Lapid pledged remarkable: “Commitment by keeping on me security Israel national”.
in Lebanon, met “Happening demarcation marine” with attitudes Multiple involve on me Lots From Differences and caliphate. some consider it By the way and not treaty and it Memorizes Rights Lebanon distance ten Years From Procrastination Waltz and pressures external. some the other consider it treaty apply on her provisions Subject 52 From the Constitution and required to conclude consent board Representatives.
apparent adverb Indicates to me that majority the Lebanese, responsible and citizens, they take regarding “the agreement” position on average, Might Disclosed From Across regarding him lawyer the doctor Judit latin by saying: “that Hopes the people Lebanese knotted today on me essence Happening demarcation the border Navy between Lebanon And”Israel” sponsored by Nations United content on me provisions fair and fair Really Lebanon to enable From investment its resources natural From Gas and petroleum, and that complete efforts in Endorsement Law Allow create cash desk sovereign to manage yields sector for the sake of the people Lebanese (newspaper “day” history 2022/10/13).
the truth I I was gesticulate still on me My opinion that “Happening demarcation marine” involves in Lots From its paragraphs on me What Indicates to me it’s a treaty, as such suggest that edit he ran on me About Lebanon Southern with Palestine occupied What required Application provisions Subject 52 From the Constitution must show it on me board Representatives to leave its conclusion.
to me that, There is Command no reduce Importance uncle previously piano he is Existence vertebrae in “the agreement” Allows for “Israel” assault on me sovereignty Lebanon and rights, as such dedicate intrusive American Always in his affairs interior, especially Economic and security.
that a look carefully to me vertebrae the agreement Allows for the student fall on me traps following:
Or not: Paragraph “of the” From Section Second for “the agreement” impose on me operator (Which a company drilling and prospecting working in block number 9 Lebanese) send notice prior to me “Israel” ask her permission The performance with some “Activities reasonable and necessary, Such as maneuvers navigational that get up out operator (…) South line the border Navy directly” What begs a question uncle Can In is happening if refused “Israel” rise operator (company working ) with that Activities necessary?
secondly: Paragraph “h” From Section Second for “the agreement” she states on me Grant “Israel” the right Discuss operator in Issue Determine “Domain Rights Economic return for Israel”، and that this is Last “you will get on me Compensation From Operator block number 9 Meeting Rights return to her From Which stocks potential in the reservoir likely”. Except give this is Paragraph From “the agreement” for “Israel” Oh really in water regional Lebanese and formation next assault on me sovereignty Lebanon?
Third: she states Paragraph (a) From Section Third for “the agreement” on me it’s a “in now It was completed Determine Which backlogs and stocks solo Other From Resources natural (…) on me the length line the border Navy, then intends the two parties, Before direct Develop Accumulation and stocks, the demand to me the states United facilitation things between the two parties (…) for the purpose of find to me Understanding Around Grant Rights and the way that Can In which prospecting About Which backlogs and stocks”. Except permit this Text to america Intervention the permanent?
Fourthly: she states Paragraph “B” From Section Third for “the agreement” on me it’s a “should on me All From the two parties to share data self relevance all Resources existing in the side the interview From line the border Navy known Currently And that that Complete determined Later with the states United”. Except involve this is Paragraph on me prejudicial lordly Lebanon and safe national if What did America supplying “Israel” with this data?
fifth: impose Paragraph (a) From Section the fourth for “the agreement” on me the two parties Solution A quarrels regarding Explanation this the agreement and application “About road discussions get up the states United facilitate it”.
From overall this is texts clear that it Allows for “Israel” prejudice lordly Lebanon, and for the states United American Intervention in his affairs interior, And for resistance (party Allah) Reply on me “Israel” and America And that on me grammar following:
– acknowledge “the agreement” Lebanon in full dominion and rights in block number 9 object to me North From Line 23، and with that Give “Israel” “the right” vacation and to reject Activities necessary that Need operator to me The performance out in block mentioned What form assault on me Rights Lebanon and his lordship in this is Region.
ـ i replied in vertebrae “the agreement” Expressions indicate dunums Clarification to me About Lebanon Navy What possibly meaning of prejudice with this the border that she position quarrel between Lebanon And”Israel”، especially regarding Line 23 and the line 29 adjoining for limits Lebanon with Palestine occupied.
– she states Paragraph “B” From Section Third as such Paragraph (a) From Section the fourth for”the agreement” on me commitment Lebanon by appeal to me America when Acquiring once morest with “Israel” regarding to implement “the agreement” What form empowering Always to america From Intervention in Affairs Lebanon interior walmart safe national and economic, And that by looking to me two things two signs: first Bind the agreement Lebanon Share America with data self relevance all Resources existing in the side the interview From line the border Navy (A the interview for limits Palestine occupied)، And the second bias America the permanent to me “Israel”What makes it wise not impartial the bit to separate quarrels emerging in Exposed to implement “the agreement”.
clear From overall this is texts that “the agreement” allowed also for “Israel” assault Will America Intervention the permanent in Affairs Lebanon interior and economic and security, as such allowed also for resistance Chance To face “Israel” in now her assault directly and indirectly on me sovereignty Lebanon and rights in its water regional.
All this is realities And the possibilities and conclusions Make From “Happening demarcation marine” treaty tainted with infractions legal and constitutional. and with that Lost I became document confessing out and obligatory for parties the three Signed on her. and whether she was an achievement historically as such describe it these and did not be, Flag Doubt in that it opened page New and confused From appeasement and warring between Lebanon and entity Zion.
*vice and minister Former
