The Court judge in Pakistan history ayesha malik chief justice | ayesha malik twitter | ayesha malik facebook”>Lahore High Court ordered the release of Parvez Elahi. Lahore High Court heard the petition filed against the arrest of Parvez Elahi in NAB. Justice Amjad Rafique heard the petition of Pervez Elahi.
During the hearing, Justice Amjad Rafiq said that there will be an inquiry on the arrest of Parvez Elahi, when the decision of the two-member bench was reached, then why was the physical remand extended? Lawyer Pervaiz Elahi requested the court that there is a lot of crowd outside the High Court, there is fear that the police will arrest them.
Justice Amjad Rafiq replied that we have said that we will not arrest in any case, I am also ordering the rest. Pervaiz Elahi had challenged the NAB arrest in the High Court. The court had ordered Parvez Elahi to appear before the court at ten o’clock.
NAB Lahore had written a letter to IG Punjab and others for Parvaizalhi’s security.
Earlier, a hearing was held in the Lahore High Court on the petition filed against the arrest of former Chief Minister Chaudhry Pervez Elahi by NAB. Justice Amjad Rafiq heard the request of Pervaiz Elahi.
During the hearing, the NAB prosecutor said that time should be given for a detailed response to the request of Chaudhry Parvez Elahi, Justice Amjad Rafique remarked that it is fine, then we order Parvez Elahi to be deported.
The court told the NAB officials that you should apply to the Chief Justice that this application be fixed for hearing before a 2-member bench. Is the arrest of the former Chief Minister of Punjab in accordance with the law?, all the questions are to be answered in your reports.
The NAB prosecutor argued that the single bench did not give a direction not to arrest Parvaiz Elahi.
The Prosecutor General said that it is in the decisions of the Supreme Court that a two-member bench can hear the cases of NAB, a single bench cannot hear the cases of NAB, it is the work of the subordinate courts to implement the decisions of the Supreme Court. Give respite, we will submit a full detailed report to the court.
The NAB prosecutor objected to the appearance of Amjad Parvez on behalf of Parvez Elahi and said that Amjad Parvez does not have a power of attorney in this case.
The court remarked that it seems like this is a personal matter of yours. The NAB prosecutor said that Amjad Parvez himself is the special prosecutor of NAB, how can he appear?
Amjad Pervez said that I represent NAB only in specific cases. Justice Amjad Rafiq said you should start the arguments, the court is giving permission, if you want me not to hear this case, then apply to the Chief Justice.
Justice Amjad Rafiq remarked that the arrest of Parvez Elahi is in accordance with the law, when the two-member bench restored the decision of the single bench, then the decision of the single bench is upheld, the law is very clear in this regard, we have to decide now. Parvez Elahi’s arrest is legal or illegal.
Lahore High Court ordered to present former Chief Minister Punjab and PTI leader Chaudhry Pervez Elahi in court at 2 pm, however NAB decided not to present Chaudhry Pervez Elahi in court.
It should be noted that Chaudhry Parvez Elahi has requested NAB to declare his arrest as illegal.
#Lahore #High #Court #ordered #release #PTI #President #Pervaiz #Elahi
**What are the potential implications of the Lahore High Court’s inquiry into the National Accountability Bureau’s handling of Parvez Elahi’s case?**
**Interview with Legal Analyst on the Lahore High Court’s Order for Parvez Elahi’s Release**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today. We’re discussing the recent Lahore High Court ruling regarding the release of former Chief Minister Parvez Elahi. Can you explain the main takeaways from this court decision?
**Guest:** Thank you for having me. The Lahore High Court, presided over by Justice Amjad Rafique, has ordered the release of Parvez Elahi after hearing his petition against the National Accountability Bureau’s (NAB) arrest. During the hearing, Justice Rafique raised crucial questions regarding the legality of extending Elahi’s physical remand after an earlier decision by a two-member bench. This implies the court is taking a serious look at the procedures followed by NAB in his case [[1](https://lhc.gov.pk/)].
**Interviewer:** Justice Rafique mentioned that there would be an inquiry into the arrest. What does this mean for the future of Elahi’s legal battles?
**Guest:** The inquiry signals that the court is not merely accepting the NAB’s actions as legitimate without scrutiny. This will hold the NAB accountable for its procedures. If the inquiry finds irregularities, it could lead to significant implications not just for Elahi, but for NAB’s practices in similar cases as well. It’s crucial that they demonstrate their actions comply with legal standards [[1](https://lhc.gov.pk/)].
**Interviewer:** During the discussion in court, there was a mention of the crowd outside and concerns for safety. What role do such circumstances play in judicial proceedings?
**Guest:** The mention of a large crowd and safety concerns reflects the political atmosphere surrounding this case. It underscores the tension and public interest in Elahi’s situation. The court’s decision to assure that no arrests would occur and to call for Elahi to appear indicates an understanding of the potential for unrest and a desire to maintain order while upholding legal processes [[1](https://lhc.gov.pk/)].
**Interviewer:** What were the arguments presented by the NAB prosecutor, and how did the court respond?
**Guest:** The NAB prosecutor requested additional time to respond to Elahi’s legal positioning, implying they needed more time to address the allegations surrounding his arrest comprehensively. However, Justice Rafique’s response suggested a level of impatience with the NAB’s procedures, reinforcing the idea that the court is committed to expediting justice rather than allowing prolonged detention without substantial legal grounds [[1](https://lhc.gov.pk/)].
**Interviewer:** Given the implications of this ruling, what should we anticipate in the coming days regarding Parvez Elahi’s case or the activities of the NAB?
**Guest:** We can expect heightened scrutiny of NAB’s methods moving forward. Additionally, Parvez Elahi’s legal team may leverage this ruling to challenge further actions by NAB or to seek broader legal recourse. It will be interesting to see if this ruling prompts the NAB to reevaluate its strategies in dealing with politically sensitive cases like Elahi’s. The court’s directive for a careful review can lead to precedents affecting future detentions and accountability [[1](https://lhc.gov.pk/)].
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights! This situation certainly highlights the intersection of law and politics in Pakistan.
**Guest:** Thank you for having me! It’s a dynamic and important issue, and I look forward to seeing how it evolves.
