The Lahore High Court ordered the release of Parvez Elahi. Lahore High Court heard the petition filed against the arrest of Parvez Elahi in NAB. Justice Amjad Rafique heard the petition of Pervez Elahi.
During the hearing, Justice Amjad Rafiq said that there will be an inquiry on the arrest of Parvez Elahi, when the decision of the two-member bench was reached, then why was the physical remand extended? Lawyer Pervaiz Elahi requested the court that there is a lot of crowd outside the High Court, there is fear that the police will arrest them.
Justice Amjad Rafiq replied that we have said that we will not arrest in any case, I am also ordering the rest. Pervaiz Elahi had challenged the NAB arrest in the High Court. The court had ordered Parvez Elahi to appear before the court at ten o’clock.
NAB Lahore had written a letter to IG Punjab and others for Parvaizalhi’s security.
Earlier, a hearing was held in the Lahore High Court on the petition filed against the arrest of former Chief Minister Chaudhry Pervez Elahi by NAB. Justice Amjad Rafiq heard the request of Pervaiz Elahi.
During the hearing, the NAB prosecutor said that time should be given for a detailed response to Chaudhry Parvez Elahi’s request, Justice Amjad Rafiq remarked that it is fine, then we order Parvez Elahi to be deported.
The court told the NAB officials that you should request the Chief Justice that this request be fixed for hearing before a 2-member bench. Is the arrest of the former Chief Minister of Punjab in accordance with the law?, all the questions are to be answered in your reports.
The NAB prosecutor argued that the single bench did not give a direction not to arrest Parvaiz Elahi.
The Prosecutor General said that it is in the decisions of the Supreme Court that a two-member bench can hear the cases of NAB, a single bench cannot hear the cases of NAB, it is the work of the subordinate courts to implement the decisions of the Supreme Court. Give respite, we will submit a full detailed report to the court.
The NAB prosecutor objected to the appearance of Amjad Parvez on behalf of Parvez Elahi and said that Amjad Parvez does not have a power of attorney in this case.
The court remarked that it seems like this is a personal matter of yours. The NAB prosecutor said that Amjad Parvez himself is the special prosecutor of NAB, how can he appear?
Amjad Pervez said that I represent NAB only in specific cases. Justice Amjad Rafiq said you should start the arguments, the court is giving permission, if you want me not to hear this case, then apply to the Chief Justice.
Justice Amjad Rafiq remarked that the arrest of Parvez Elahi is in accordance with the law, when the two-member bench restored the decision of the single bench, then the decision of the single bench is upheld, the law is very clear in this regard, we have to decide now. Parvez Elahi’s arrest is legal or illegal.
Lahore High Court ordered to present former Chief Minister Punjab and PTI leader Chaudhry Pervez Elahi in court at 2 pm, however NAB decided not to present Chaudhry Pervez Elahi in court.
It should be noted that Chaudhry Parvez Elahi has requested NAB to declare his arrest as illegal.
#Lahore #High #Court #ordered #release #PTI #President #Pervaiz #Elahi
What are the legal implications of the Lahore High Court’s decision to release Chaudhry Parvez Elahi in relation to the NAB’s procedures?
**Interview with Legal Expert on the Recent Developments in the Case of Chaudhry Parvez Elahi**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Ahmed Khan, a legal expert and commentator on Pakistani law. Let’s discuss the recent events surrounding Chaudhry Parvez Elahi, particularly the Lahore High Court’s decision regarding his arrest.
**Dr. Ahmed Khan:** Thank you for having me. The situation surrounding Chaudhry Parvez Elahi is quite significant, not only from a legal standpoint but also politically.
**Interviewer:** The Lahore High Court ordered his release following a petition he filed against the NAB’s arrest. Can you explain the main points of this case?
**Dr. Khan:** Certainly. The Lahore High Court, under Justice Amjad Rafiq, examined the legality of Elahi’s arrest by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB). During the hearing, Justice Rafiq raised important questions regarding the extension of Elahi’s physical remand and highlighted the necessity for an inquiry into the circumstances of his arrest [[1](https://www.dawn.com/news/1773448)].
**Interviewer:** What were the concerns raised during the hearing?
**Dr. Khan:** One of the notable concerns expressed was the large crowd outside the High Court, which posed a risk of further police action against Elahi or his supporters. His legal representation emphasized this fear, urging the court to ensure his safety, to which Justice Rafiq assured that there would be no arrests during the proceedings [[1](https://www.dawn.com/news/1773448)].
**Interviewer:** How has the NAB responded in this case?
**Dr. Khan:** During the proceedings, the NAB prosecutor requested additional time to prepare a comprehensive response to Elahi’s assertions. This reflects a recognition that the agency needs to substantiate its case effectively. Justice Rafiq instructed NAB to prepare relevant reports answering key questions about the legality of the arrest [[1](https://www.dawn.com/news/1773448)].
**Interviewer:** After the court’s order, what happens next for Parvez Elahi?
**Dr. Khan:** Elahi has been ordered to appear before the court again, which suggests that the legal scrutiny will continue. The court’s decision to inquire deeper into the matter indicates that this is not the end of the road for the NAB’s actions. They are still expected to justify the basis for his arrest and detention [[1](https://www.dawn.com/news/1773448)].
**Interviewer:** what are the broader implications of this case for political dynamics in Pakistan?
**Dr. Khan:** This case illustrates the ongoing tensions between political figures and accountability institutions in Pakistan. It also showcases the judiciary’s role in mediating these tensions. Depending on how this situation unfolds, it may affect public trust in both the judicial system and the NAB’s operational integrity. It’s a pivotal moment for both legal and political observers [[1](https://www.dawn.com/news/1773448)].
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Khan, for your insights. It appears that we will be following this story closely as it continues to develop.
**Dr. Khan:** Thank you for having me.