The Lahore High Court ordered the release of Parvez Elahi. Lahore High Court heard the petition filed against the arrest of Parvez Elahi in NAB. Justice Amjad Rafique heard the petition of Pervez Elahi.
During the hearing, Justice Amjad Rafiq said that there will be an inquiry on the arrest of Parvez Elahi, when the decision of the two-member bench was reached, then why was the physical remand extended? Lawyer Pervaiz Elahi requested the court that there is a lot of crowd outside the High Court, there is fear that the police will arrest them.
Justice Amjad Rafiq replied that we have said that we will not arrest in any case, I am also ordering the rest. Pervaiz Elahi had challenged the NAB arrest in the High Court. The court had ordered Parvez Elahi to appear before the court at ten o’clock.
NAB Lahore had written a letter to IG Punjab and others for Parvaizalhi’s security.
Earlier, a hearing was held in the Lahore High Court on the petition filed against the arrest of former Chief Minister Chaudhry Pervez Elahi by NAB. Justice Amjad Rafiq heard the request of Pervaiz Elahi.
During the hearing, the NAB prosecutor said that time should be given for a detailed response to Chaudhry Parvez Elahi’s request, Justice Amjad Rafiq remarked that it is fine, then we order Parvez Elahi to be deported.
The court told the NAB officials that you should request the Chief Justice that this request be fixed for hearing before a 2-member bench. Is the arrest of the former Chief Minister of Punjab in accordance with the law?, all the questions are to be answered in your reports.
The NAB prosecutor argued that the single bench did not give a direction not to arrest Parvaiz Elahi.
The Prosecutor General said that it is in the decisions of the Supreme Court that a two-member bench can hear the cases of NAB, a single bench cannot hear the cases of NAB, it is the work of the subordinate courts to implement the decisions of the Supreme Court. Give respite, we will submit a full detailed report to the court.
The NAB prosecutor objected to the appearance of Amjad Parvez on behalf of Parvez Elahi and said that Amjad Parvez does not have a power of attorney in this case.
The court remarked that it seems like this is a personal matter of yours. The NAB prosecutor said that Amjad Parvez himself is the special prosecutor of NAB, how can he appear?
Amjad Pervez said that I represent NAB only in specific cases. Justice Amjad Rafiq said you should start the arguments, the court is giving permission, if you want me not to hear this case, then apply to the Chief Justice.
Justice Amjad Rafiq remarked that the arrest of Parvez Elahi is in accordance with the law, when the two-member bench restored the decision of the single bench, then the decision of the single bench is upheld, the law is very clear in this regard, we have to decide now. Parvez Elahi’s arrest is legal or illegal.
Lahore High Court ordered to present former Chief Minister Punjab and PTI leader Chaudhry Pervez Elahi in court at 2 pm, however NAB decided not to present Chaudhry Pervez Elahi in court.
It should be noted that Chaudhry Parvez Elahi has requested NAB to declare his arrest as illegal.
#Lahore #High #Court #ordered #release #PTI #President #Pervaiz #Elahi
What potential legal precedents could Parvez Elahi’s case set for future NAB proceedings?
**Interview with Legal Expert on Lahore High Court Ruling for Parvez Elahi’s Release**
**Host:** Welcome to our news discussion today. We have with us legal expert and political analyst, Dr. Saima Raza, to discuss the recent developments surrounding former Chief Minister of Punjab, Parvez Elahi. Dr. Raza, thank you for joining us.
**Dr. Raza:** Thank you for having me.
**Host:** Let’s dive right in. The Lahore High Court recently ordered the release of Parvez Elahi after hearing his petition against his arrest by the NAB. Can you explain the significance of this ruling?
**Dr. Raza:** Certainly. The ruling by Justice Amjad Rafiq is significant for several reasons. First, it highlights the role of the judiciary in overseeing the actions of law enforcement agencies, such as the NAB. The court’s decision to order his release suggests that there may have been procedural flaws in his arrest or remand, which is a crucial aspect of ensuring justice.
**Host:** During the hearing, Justice Rafiq raised concerns about why the physical remand of Elahi was extended despite the court’s decision. What does this indicate about the legal battles ahead?
**Dr. Raza:** This indicates that there’s a potential lack of clarity or consistency in how NAB is handling such cases. Justice Rafiq’s inquiry into the rationale behind extending the remand serves as a warning to the NAB, suggesting that the court is vigilant about safeguarding the rights of individuals against arbitrary detention. This could lead to further scrutiny of NAB’s procedures and practices.
**Host:** There were also mentions of security concerns for Elahi outside the court. How does the court typically address such situations?
**Dr. Raza:** It’s common for courts to take precautionary measures when there are security concerns for defendants, especially in politically sensitive cases. In this instance, since there were fears of potential arrest following the court’s order, the court’s acknowledgment of these concerns demonstrates a commitment to ensuring the safety of all individuals involved in the proceedings.
**Host:** The NAB prosecutor argued that they needed more time to respond to Elahi’s petition. How does this play into the overall case?
**Dr. Raza:** This adds another layer of complexity to the situation. The NAB’s need for more time may reflect the challenges they face in substantiating their case against Elahi. This delay can also be interpreted as a strategy to regroup and gather stronger evidence, but it can also be seen as an indication that they might not be fully prepared to justify their actions legally, which could work to Elahi’s advantage.
**Host:** given the political context and the high-profile nature of this case, what implications do you see for the broader political landscape in Punjab?
**Dr. Raza:** The implications are quite significant. Parvez Elahi is a key player in Punjab politics, and his legal battles are likely to resonate within the political arena. A favorable ruling for him could bolster his position and influence, while any setbacks may affect his party’s standing and the ongoing political dynamics. Additionally, this case could inspire other politicians to challenge similar actions by the NAB, potentially leading to a larger debate on the accountability and reaches of such governmental bodies.
**Host:** Thank you, Dr. Raza, for your insights into this important issue. We appreciate your expertise on the nuances of this case and its potential ramifications.
**Dr. Raza:** Thank you for having me, and I look forward to seeing how this situation unfolds.
**Host:** That’s all for today’s discussion. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.
