It is now a widely accepted fact: the housing crisis is inextricably linked to mass immigration.
The Canadian political class, staunchly pro-immigration, has been compelled to acknowledge this over the past year. This is despite their best efforts to downplay the connection, and we can be certain they have tried to minimize its importance.
But the reality was too substantial to be ignored or concealed any longer, especially since mass immigration also places pressure on social services and strains public finances. Not to mention, as François Legault rightly pointed out, that it significantly destabilizes social cohesion.
Europe
Yet, observing the transformation of Western Europe over the past 30 years would be enough to convince anyone of this reality.
The initial conclusion was therefore inescapable: we must put an end to this.
This is why we initially sought to reduce temporary immigration.
But very quickly, the pro-immigration advocates rallied and proposed a distorted view of the situation.
They claim that the housing crisis does not stem from mass immigration but from the inadequate construction of housing in Canada. In other words, they maintain that the population growth fueled by successive waves of migration is a fundamental and immutable element of Canadian policy, to which we must simply adapt.
Canadians and Quebecers must fundamentally alter their way of life. They must transform their vision of the country. They must yield to those arriving, even illegally.
And all of this is bound to have real consequences on their lives.
So, a certain tune begins to be heard: Should we not reduce the size of our houses and apartments to create a more densely populated society, perhaps even abandoning the ideal of individual property? Tomorrow, this will be justified in the name of ecological degrowth. We know this song.
As Frédéric Lacroix, a close observer of these issues, states, we are gradually moving towards an authoritarianism that seeks to appear virtuous.
However, this isn’t the first time that the principles upon which society rests have been altered in the name of mass immigration.
Thus, increasingly, we have abandoned the promotion of individuals based on merit in favor of ethnic quotas and racial preferences – this is disingenuously called “promoting diversity.”
Furthermore, still in the realm of housing, Radio-Canada informed us last week that low-cost housing built with federal funds is reserved for “visible minorities” and “immigrants.”
Canada
In other words, Canadians, including Quebecers, pay taxes for services they will not be able to access – unless they are non-white, as we understand it, because then they will fit into the right category.
These policies are rooted in anti-white racism that political correctness has the audacity to present as anti-racism.
Moreover, anyone who speaks out against this will be accused of racism. This is how public discourse is censored. A diverse society is an authoritarian society.
The Housing Crisis and the Inevitable Link to Mass Immigration
The housing crisis, a pressing issue across Canada, is inextricably linked to mass immigration, a fact that is gaining wider acceptance. While the Canadian political class, largely pro-immigration, has acknowledged this connection, they try to downplay its significance. However, the reality is too substantial to be ignored, especially as mass immigration also strains social services and public finances, and, as François Legault astutely pointed out, threatens social cohesion.
Learning from Europe’s Experiences
Observing the evolution of Western Europe over the past three decades provides a stark warning. The consequences of unchecked immigration are evident, leading to the realization that a course correction is necessary. This recognition has spurred calls to curtail temporary immigration, but the pro-immigration lobby has countered with a different narrative.
Their argument hinges on the claim that the housing crisis stems not from mass immigration but from insufficient housing construction in Canada. They posit that population growth fueled by immigration is an inherent and unchanging aspect of Canadian policy, and that society must adapt. They argue that Canadians and Quebecers should embrace a radical shift in their way of life, accepting the influx of newcomers, even those entering the country illegally. These demands will undoubtedly have far-reaching consequences for their lives.
This line of reasoning has paved the way for a new chorus: should we not downsize our homes and apartments to create a denser society, potentially sacrificing the ideal of private property? This line of thought will likely be justified as ‘ecological degrowth’ in the future. A familiar tune.
As Frédéric Lacroix, a keen observer of these developments, points out, we are witnessing a gradual transition towards a virtuous authoritarianism.
Shifting Principles: Meritocracy vs. Diversity
This is not the first instance where the principles underpinning our society have been altered in the name of mass immigration. In an increasing number of fields, promotion based on merit has been abandoned in favor of ethnic quotas and racial preferences, conveniently labeled as “promoting diversity”.
In the realm of housing, Radio-Canada recently revealed that low-cost housing built with federal funds is reserved for “visible minorities” and “immigrants”. This means Canadians and Quebecers are paying taxes for services they will not be able to access unless they belong to these specific groups. This policy rests on an insidious form of anti-white racism disguised as anti-racism by political correctness.
Censorship and Anti-White Sentiment
Those who dare to challenge these policies are labeled as racist, effectively silencing public debate. This silencing is a tactic of authoritarianism masquerading as diversity. The truth is that a diverse society is often an authoritarian society, a reality that cannot be ignored.
Consequences of Unchecked Immigration
Housing Crunch
Mass immigration has exacerbated the housing crisis in Canada, driving up prices and making it increasingly difficult for Canadians to find affordable housing. The influx of new residents has strained housing infrastructure and created a shortage, leading to higher rents and property values. This situation is particularly acute in major cities like Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal, where the demand for housing far outstrips the supply.
Strained Social Services
The increased demand for social services, such as healthcare and education, has strained public finances and put a burden on existing resources. The influx of newcomers often requires additional support, including language classes, job training, and healthcare services. The strain on social services can lead to longer wait times and reduced access to care for existing residents.
Cultural and Social Tensions
Massive immigration can lead to cultural and social tensions, particularly when newcomers are unable to integrate into the existing social fabric. Differences in values, beliefs, and customs can create friction and misunderstandings, leading to social fragmentation and polarization.
Erosion of National Identity
Critics argue that mass immigration can erode national identity and dilute the cultural heritage of a country. While diversity can be a positive aspect of society, unchecked immigration without proper integration can undermine the sense of shared identity and belonging that is crucial for a cohesive nation.
A Broader Perspective
The housing crisis is just one manifestation of the broader challenges posed by mass immigration. It’s a complex issue with far-reaching consequences that demand a nuanced and responsible approach. Open dialogue and thoughtful policies are essential to ensure that immigration contributes to a stronger, more prosperous and inclusive Canada. The future of our country and our communities is at stake, and we must address these challenges with wisdom and courage.