The hearing on the bail application of Chairman Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) arrested in the cipher case has been adjourned till September 4. Special Secret Court Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain conducted the hearing on PTI chairman’s bail application in the cipher case.
According to the sources, Babar Awan and Salman Safdar, the lawyers of Chairman PTI, gave arguments on the bail application and Salman Safdar said that the Chairman PTI’s lawyers should not be obstructed in Attock Jail. had to walk one and a half kilometers, a petition has been filed against the trial in Attock Jail.
During the hearing, Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s lawyer Ali Bukhari also appeared in the court and said that he would like to give arguments on his client’s bail application today.
According to media reports, PTI Chairman’s lawyers requested to hear the arguments on the bail application, while Special Prosecutor FIA opposed hearing the arguments on the PTI Chairman’s bail application today.
According to media reports, Special Prosecutor FIA objected to the petitions filed by PTI’s legal team in the Islamabad High Court and said that they requested to postpone the hearing on the bail petition.
According to media reports, during the hearing, the FIA prosecutor said that Chairman PTI has filed petitions related to this court in the High Court, while Chairman PTI’s lawyer Intizar Panjotha said that we withdraw the petitions from the High Court. , the High Court did not stay the bail application.
The FIA prosecutor said that the hearing of the case has been postponed, nothing can be done now.
According to media reports, after hearing the arguments of the parties, the judge of the Special Secret Court adjourned the hearing on PTI chairman’s bail application till September 4.
It should be remembered that Chairman PTI was arrested on August 5 in the Tosha Khana case and transferred to Attock Jail after serving a 3-year sentence, and during the detention FIA also arrested him in the cipher disappearance case.
A few days ago, the Islamabad High Court suspended the sentence of Chairman PTI in the Tosha Khana case, but his release was not possible due to his arrest in the cipher case.
#hearing #PTI #chairmans #bail #application #adjourned #September
How might the adjournment of the bail hearing affect the overall timeline and strategy of the legal proceedings?
**Interview with Legal Expert on PTI Chairman’s Bail Hearing**
**Interviewer:** Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us today. We’re here to discuss the recent developments surrounding the bail application of the Chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) in the cipher case. The hearing has been adjourned until September 4. What can you tell us about the current legal situation?
**Guest:** Good afternoon, and thank you for having me. The adjournment of the bail hearing indicates that the legal process is still unfolding. In this case, the special secret court, presided over by Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain, will be considering various arguments from the defense team. The lawyers, Babar Awan and Salman Safdar, have raised significant concerns, particularly regarding access to their client in Attock Jail.
**Interviewer:** Yes, I noticed that there were complaints about access to the Chairman PTI. Can you elaborate on this?
**Guest:** Certainly. Lawyer Salman Safdar highlighted that the defense has faced undue obstacles in meeting with their client, requiring them to travel a considerable distance within the jail premises. This raises important questions regarding the right to a fair trial and the defendants’ ability to prepare their case adequately. Their petition against the trial taking place in Attock Jail suggests that they may seek a more impartial environment for legal proceedings.
**Interviewer:** Besides the issue of access, we also saw Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s lawyer expressing a desire to make arguments for his client’s bail. How does this affect the overall proceedings?
**Guest:** The involvement of Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s lawyer, Ali Bukhari, underscores that there may be interconnected issues with multiple defendants in this case. Each lawyer seeking to argue for their client’s bail keeps the court informed of the broader implications. This also implies that the judge may need to consider how the outcomes for the various defendants could impact one another.
**Interviewer:** With the hearing adjourned until September 4, what can we expect moving forward?
**Guest:** The adjournment allows both sides to prepare their cases further. The defense will likely gather more evidence and prepare their arguments regarding the Chairman’s release. Meanwhile, the prosecution will also be preparing to counter those arguments. It’s essential for the court to weigh the legal and humanitarian considerations involved, especially when it comes to access to legal representation and the conditions within which the defendants are held.
**Interviewer:** Thank you so much for your insights. It’s a complex situation, and we appreciate your expertise in breaking it down for us.
**Guest:** Thank you for having me. I look forward to discussing future developments as they unfold.
