The hearing on the bail application of Chairman Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) arrested in the cipher case has been adjourned till September 4. Special Secret Court Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain conducted the hearing on PTI chairman’s bail application in the cipher case.
According to the sources, Babar Awan and Salman Safdar, the lawyers of Chairman PTI, gave arguments on the bail application and Salman Safdar said that the Chairman PTI’s lawyers should not be obstructed in Attock Jail. had to walk one and a half kilometers, a petition has been filed against the trial in Attock Jail.
During the hearing, Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s lawyer Ali Bukhari also appeared in the court and said that he would like to give arguments on his client’s bail application today.
According to media reports, PTI Chairman’s lawyers requested to hear the arguments on the bail application, while Special Prosecutor FIA opposed hearing the arguments on the PTI Chairman’s bail application today.
According to media reports, Special Prosecutor FIA objected to the petitions filed by PTI’s legal team in the Islamabad High Court and said that they requested to postpone the hearing on the bail petition.
According to media reports, during the hearing, the FIA prosecutor said that Chairman PTI has filed petitions related to this court in the High Court, while Chairman PTI’s lawyer Intizar Panjotha said that we withdraw the petitions from the High Court. , the High Court did not stay the bail application.
The FIA prosecutor said that the hearing of the case has been postponed, nothing can be done now.
According to media reports, after hearing the arguments of the parties, the judge of the Special Secret Court adjourned the hearing on PTI chairman’s bail application till September 4.
It should be remembered that Chairman PTI was arrested and transferred to Attock Jail after serving 3 years in the Tosha Khana case on August 5 and FIA also arrested him in the Cipher missing case while in custody.
A few days ago, the Islamabad High Court had suspended the sentence of Chairman PTI in the Tosha Khana case, but due to his arrest in the cipher case, he The release was not possible.
#hearing #PTI #chairmans #bail #application #adjourned #September
What are the implications of the reported access issues faced by Imran Khan’s legal team in Attock Jail on his bail hearing and overall case strategy?
**Interview with Legal Expert on Imran Khan’s Bail Hearing in the Cipher Case**
**Host:** Welcome to today’s segment where we discuss the ongoing legal challenges facing former Prime Minister Imran Khan, specifically regarding his bail application in the cipher case. To provide insights, we have legal expert Sarah Khan with us. Sarah, thank you for joining us.
**Sarah:** Thank you for having me.
**Host:** Let’s dive right in. The hearing on Imran Khan’s bail application was adjourned recently. What were the key points raised by his lawyers during this hearing?
**Sarah:** The lawyers, Babar Awan and Salman Safdar, presented arguments emphasizing that their access to Khan in Attock Jail was being obstructed. Salman Safdar specifically highlighted logistical difficulties, mentioning that they had to walk one and a half kilometers to reach him. This raised concerns about the fairness of the trial and the defendants’ rights during such proceedings [[1](https://www.yahoo.com/news/pakistans-imran-khan-gets-bail-124454592.html)].
**Host:** Interesting. It seems access to legal representation is a significant issue here. What did the court indicate regarding this bail application?
**Sarah:** The court, presided over by Special Secret Court Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain, decided to adjourn the hearing until September 4. This suggests that the court is taking the matter under serious consideration, possibly looking for further arguments or evidence before making a decision [[1](https://www.yahoo.com/news/pakistans-imran-khan-gets-bail-124454592.html)].
**Host:** Apart from Imran Khan’s lawyers, we also know that Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s lawyer was present in court. How might this affect the proceedings?
**Sarah:** Yes, Ali Bukhari, representing Shah Mehmood Qureshi, expressed his intent to present arguments for his client, which could indicate that the case involves broader implications beyond Khan himself. If others are summoned or questioned during the proceedings, it could complicate the legal landscape and provide additional context to the court’s decisions down the line.
**Host:** With all these developments, what do you think the next steps will be for Imran Khan and his legal team?
**Sarah:** Moving forward, Khan’s legal team will likely focus on clearing up the access issues they claimed to face in prison and strengthening their arguments for bail based on those claims and other legal precedents. They will be preparing for the next hearing on September 4, where further arguments can hopefully address the court’s concerns.
**Host:** Thank you, Sarah, for your insights on this complex situation. We’ll continue to monitor this case closely as it develops.
**Sarah:** Thank you for having me, looking forward to discussing it further.
**Host:** And thank you to our viewers for tuning in. Stay informed as we cover this and other developments in Pakistani politics.
—
This format provides a concise yet informative perspective on the legal proceedings surrounding Imran Khan’s bail application, highlighting the key issues and implications for the future.